BCA Bomber Shovel Review


Post by WildSnow.com blogger | May 22, 2013      

The BCA Bomber shovel

Shovels are arguably one of the most important pieces of avy gear we carry. It’s virtually impossible to perform a rescue without one. Unfortunately the rescue aspect is entirely reactive — hopefully something I won’t ever have to test. However, the myriad of other uses for shovels make them stand out as a backcountry tool. Digging snow pits, tent platforms, snow anchors, etc., make the shovel a BC multi-tool. My shovel seems to come out of the pack on almost every tour.

I’ve used BCA shovels for years. They’ve always been solid and simple. Older model BCAs however, had a weak point in their method of attaching the handle, using a circle bent out of the metal of the blade. The same technique is used by lots of other shovel manufactures, probably including the one that makes your gardening shovel. I’ve heard about this being a potential weak point but it always seemed like a small issue; unlikely to actually explode.

Indeed, according to BCA the rate of breakage for the older model shovels was tiny, and over the years there have no doubt been hundreds of rescues performed with BCA shovels. However, this summer in South America, my older model broke. I was digging a pit through a super hard rain layer, and SNAP, the shovel handle popped off the blade. I was amazed at how easy it broke and immediately decided to get a new, stronger, shovel the first chance I got.

Old BCA shovel, with arrow pointing to the weak point of the construction.

The Bomber series of shovels feature a welded attachment. Much stronger.

Old style BCA shovel on the left, new on the right. Big difference. The new shovel is stronger, and has more surface area, while still being the same weight, and takes up less space. Cool!

So after numerous and sometimes ludicrous South American shovel solutions, upon my return to the states I picked up a new BCA B2 shovel. With their “B” models BCA has updated their shovels significantly with stronger construction and a few extra features. Their Bomber line of shovels features a welded tube that holds the handle. This means that there’s twice as much material that has to break, making the connection much stronger. The new system also makes the shovel pack a bit better, since the handle attachment doesn’t protrude out. The new shovel also features a square top, which increases the surface area, and provides a flat area to push on with your foot. A few other new features are stiffening ribs on the shovel blade and an updated handle. They retained their standard ovalized handle, so it is backwards compatible with older shovel handles. I have a heavier handle with an integrated saw that I use in the winter, and a lighter one that I use for spring or low-danger tours.

The BCA handle is interesting. It's designed to be held like this, rather than with split fingers like a normal T-grip. Several other companies have moved to this style of grip as well.

I’ve been using the Bomber shovel all winter. It’s been working perfectly. Beyond plenty of strength, the pack-ability is the most noticeable improvement. One other problem I’ve experienced with shovels in the past is snow plugging the shaft, either making the shovel heavy, or making the pins not work. BCA included a small plastic plug in the end of the handle that solves this issue. I haven’t encountered any situations that really tested the strength of the shovel, but it is holding up well.

BCA shovels use an oval handle, making it easy to line up the pins with the holes when assembling the shovel. An unfortunate by-product of the design is that it tends to bind up, especially with snow and ice. This isn’t really a safety issue, because it only gets stuck when it is assembled, but it’s a bummer when you can’t bifurcate the shovel from its handle.

It appears most shovel manufacturers have switched to using a similar method of construction, a great thing to see. With so many companies changing their products every year for no apparent reason, it’s nice to see some real improvement. The B2 shovel is a nice example of good design and engineering improving a product without creating any undesirable compromises.

Shop for the BCA B2 shovel here

Comments

5 Responses to “BCA Bomber Shovel Review”

  1. josh May 22nd, 2013 11:13 am

    I also own this shovel and agree with the review. One negative that I would point out is with the strengthening “ribs” on the shovel. When digging snow profiles, I’ve noticed that these ribs leave grooves in my pit walls, and they make it difficult to create smooth walls. I know that they look cool…but I’d love to see BCA make this same shovel with a smooth blade.

  2. Jack May 22nd, 2013 4:23 pm

    Really sound report. That near fold on the old style shovel looks like a stress concentrator to me, a source of metal fatigue. It seems like the new shovel is a winner.

  3. Terrance May 22nd, 2013 8:11 pm

    Josh,
    Good point, just need back side smooth.

  4. Edge May 27th, 2013 3:03 pm

    For those of you concerned about keeping your pit wall really smooth, we kept a secret stash of our Companion shovels. Call BCA if you want one. But you can keep the pit wall smooth by just running the blade down the face a few times with the handle pulled toward you, so only the edge of the blade is scraping the wall, not the entire blade surface.

  5. snowbot May 31st, 2013 10:41 am

    I have no problem keeping pit walls clean and smooth with this shovel. In fact, it’s the way it makes smooth pit walls is one of the things I most like about it. I don’t know if I’m using Edge’s technique, because it’s not something that seems to take much effort or thought.

Got something to say? Please do so.





Anti-Spam Quiz:

You can subscribe to comment notification by checking the box to left, but you must leave a brief comment to do so, which records your email and requires you to use our anti-spam challange. If you don't like leaving substantive comments that's fine, just leave a simple comment that says something like "thanks, subscribed" with a made-up name. Check the comment subscription checkbox BEFORE you submit.
If you need an emoticon for a comment just copy/paste off the following list, or use text code you might be familiar with.

:D    :-)    :(    :lol:    :x    :P    :oops:    :cry:    :evil:    :twisted:    :roll:    :wink:    :!:    :?:    :idea:    :arrow:   
  
Due to comment spam we moderate most comments. Please do not submit your comment twice -- it will appear shortly after approval. Comments with one or more links in the text may be held in moderation, for spam prevention. If you'd like to publish a photo in a comment, contact us. Guidelines: Be civil, no personal attacks, avoid vulgarity and profanity.

  Your Comments

  • VT skier: Lou, Here is a link to some weights and prices for smaller LiPos used in ...
  • Harpo: I wanted a longterm review of the Light Removable including how the light w...
  • Lou Dawson 2: Got a better scale for larger weights, weight of Voltair 30 liter unfortuna...
  • Lou Dawson 2: Hi Harpo, we're working on a lot of things, not sure exactly when that will...
  • Tyler Eardley: I'm 99% sure this is the boot of choice for splitboarders. I'm taking the p...
  • harpo: Hi Wildsnow, I think you indicated in the comments that you would be doing ...
  • Eric B: I agree with the "one deploy" philosophy. If you ever had to use one of th...
  • Lou Dawson 2: Finn, my understanding from our extensive comment threads is that there are...
  • Lou Dawson 2: Hi See, I didn't feel like you were detracting from anything, but thanks fo...
  • See: I am in no way trying to detract from your project here, Lou. I’m totally i...
  • finn: Ok, after reading all of this, what is the opinion of the safest tech bindi...
  • Stewart: Seems just another example of technological fetishism and consumerism unhin...
  • Lou Dawson 2: I found what's possibly a better, lighter weight converter, ordered it. ...
  • Lou Dawson 2: See, good points. My UsbAir wiring harness indeed weighs less than yet anot...
  • Jeremy C: I doubt a USB feed off your avalanche airbag, is something that any manufac...
  • See: Great fun, but a 9000 mAh usb charger weighs less than 8 ounces, can be kep...
  • Lou Dawson 2: Drew, I actually do agree with you, I think the "one deploy" model is way b...
  • Lou Dawson 2: It's a Galaxy Note 1, been in use for about 18 months with the same battery...
  • Buck: "Speaking of the Galaxy Note, it’s got a massive aftermarket battery on it....
  • Drew Tabke: The philosophy behind the multiple-deploy design principle is madness. If y...
  • Lou Dawson 2: I don't see why not. It would run your tablet as well. It's basically a hig...
  • Billy: Can you charge your galaxy with that contraption while flying on a commerci...
  • Lou Dawson 2: Thanks Andrew, I was hoping someone who knew something would chime in and h...
  • Dan: Lou, you are sick...brilliant, but sick....
  • Andrew: Battery size appears super-conservative, assuming you somehow keep the batt...
  • Joe John: Pretty crafty Lou!...
  • Max: So here is the problem I have. "Pack without battery, with controller u...
  • Lou Dawson 2: Bear in mind that weight is the pack without battery but WITH the black-box...
  • Trent: Thank you. Very helpful. "Pack without battery, with controller unit, ba...
  • Lou Dawson 2: Thanks Eric, we played around with that for a while but the packs change so...

  Recent Posts


Facebook Twitter Google Instagram Youtube
Welcome to Louis (Lou) Dawson's backcountry skiing information & opinion website. Lou's passion for the past 50 years has been alpinism, climbing, mountaineering and skiing -- along with all manner of outdoor recreation. He has authored numerous books and articles about ski touring and is well known as the first person to ski down all 54 of Colorado's 14,000-foot peaks, otherwise known as the Fourteeners! Books and free ski touring news and information here.

All material on this website is copyrighted, the name WildSnow is trademarked, permission required for reproduction (electronic or otherwise) and display on other websites. PLEASE SEE OUR COPYRIGHT and TRADEMARK INFORMATION.

Backcountry skiing is dangerous. You may be killed or severely injured if you do any form of ski mountaineering, skimo randonnee and randonnée skiing. The information and news on this website is intended only as general information. While the authors and editors of the information on this website make every effort to present useful information about ski mountaineering, due to human error the information, text and images contained within this website may be inaccurate, false, or out-of-date. By using, reading or viewing the information provided on this website, you agree to absolve the owners of Wild Snow as well as content contributors of any liability for injuries or losses incurred while using such information. Furthermore, you agree to use any of this website's information, maps, photos, or binding mounting instructions templates at your own risk, and waive Wild Snow owners and contributors of liability for use of said items for ski touring or any other use.

Switch To Mobile Version