Guest Blog — More About the Jay Peak Cutters


Post by WildSnow.com blogger | September 14, 2007      

Thanks all for your excellent comments about the Jay Peak trail cutting. To sum it up, this interesting email came in today — we thought it would make a good guest blog as it seems to focus in on a core issue that for backcountry skiers might be THE issue.

By Chris Skalka

Hi Lou, I live in VT near Jay and so have some local insight into the “Jay Peak Cutters” (call them JPCs).

There is no doubt that trail cutting is very active and generally accepted around here. In fact, that has a lot to do with the negative reaction to the JPCs among locals. The thing is, there are relevant conditions which are specific to the cutting up here:

– The geographic area is really small compared to the West, the terrain rarely requires technical mountaineering skills to access, and there are a lot of people skiing, so you need to “fog out” your stashes to keep out the riff-raff.

– There is a lot less wilderness up here than in the West, and the political attitude is much more conservationist, so you need to be very subtle about cutting to maintain the “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy practiced by the ski areas, or to avoid outright prosecution by the Parks Services frantically trying to protect the little wilderness they have.

In short, the understood norm is that cutting should be very low-key — entrances and exits should be invisible, don’t cut anything thicker than your thumb, etc. It ends up being more a matter of clearing pucker from otherwise skiable glades than outright cutting a new trail (though of course we all cheat a little sometimes).

So, what the JPCs did was violate local etiquette and endanger cutting in general, since the average Joe will identify all cutters with the JPCs (note in particular that Big Jay is a favorite BC stash, and even the access situation there is *very* tenuous due to the management of Jay). And they did it in such a wildly over-the-top fashion (the fact that their cut is visible from Jay resort is almost laughable), that it is clear they’re total newbies, almost certainly not experienced BC skiers. So of course, that such tyros would endanger our sh*t is really making people see red.

Anyway, I certainly understand the points you’re making, but I wanted to point out that there are some local peculiarities relevant to the situation.

Hope it’s snowing for you in CO, we’re just heading into Fall up here and can’t wait for the skiing.

-Chris



IF YOU'RE HAVING TROUBLE VIEWING SITE, TRY WHITELISTING IN YOUR ADBLOCKER, OTHERWISE PLEASE CONTACT US USING MENU ABOVE, OR FACEBOOK.

Comments

4 Responses to “Guest Blog — More About the Jay Peak Cutters”

  1. Brad September 15th, 2007 8:30 am

    I spent 4 years skiing Jay Peak in the late ’90’s before Big Jay exploded in popularity. Generally you could find fresh tracks 1 week after a storm on Big Jay. What surprises me the most about this story is that the run was perfect and did not need any trimming or cutting. It was a classic Northeast gladded ski run – steep with perfectly spaced trees. I hope this incident does not ruin the experience for my friends who still ski at Jay and prevent future backcountry access in the area. Some of my best memories from Jay are skiing this run in neck deep powder with a small group of close friends.

    On a side note, I seem to remember in 1999 the Ski Area cut a trail to the top of Big Jay without obtaining proper approval from the group managing the land. If I remember correctly the resort was fined for each tree that was cut down (this was a 1-2 mile – 3 foot wide trail — lots of trees were cut).

    Does anyone have a picture of the damage on Big Jay?

  2. Cork Nester September 15th, 2007 2:10 pm

    Hi Lou;

    I agree with Chris completely. We follow a similar motto here in the Adirondacks. A little here, and a little there will most of the time make for a far more exciting and challenging run, than just a clear cut swath. These guys have threatened the joy of skiing in the BC for everyone in the Jay area. They should be publicly flogged!!
    Just my two cents.

    Cork

  3. Mark September 16th, 2007 1:11 pm

    It seems the greatest harm that has been done, in the context of backcountry skiing, is that the whole endeavor of backcountry skiing in that area is now under the microscope and access could be damaged. That’s really unfortunate.

  4. Bob Misu September 18th, 2007 9:58 am

    You have to wonder how this will effect the mountain itself. Many of the trees cut (according to one news report) are over a foot in diameter. Erosion is bound to be a problem and will ruin what was a “classic Northeast gladded ski run – steep with perfectly spaced trees”- Brad.
    Chris’ comment: “In short, the understood norm is that cutting should be very low-key — entrances and exits should be invisible, don’t cut anything thicker than your thumb, etc.” – should be considered more than a rule of “thumb” but practically a law.

  Your Comments


  Recent Posts




Facebook Twitter Google Instagram Youtube

WildSnow Twitter Feed



 



  • Blogroll & Links


  • Welcome to Louis (Lou) Dawson's backcountry skiing information & opinion website. Lou's passion for the past 50 years has been alpinism, climbing, mountaineering and skiing -- along with all manner of outdoor recreation. He has authored numerous books and articles about ski touring and is well known as the first person to ski down all 54 of Colorado's 14,000-foot peaks, otherwise known as the Fourteeners! Books and free ski touring news and information here.

    All material on this website is copyrighted, the name WildSnow is trademarked, permission required for reproduction (electronic or otherwise) and display on other websites. PLEASE SEE OUR COPYRIGHT and TRADEMARK INFORMATION.

    We include "affiliate sales" links with most of our blog posts. This means we receive a percentage of a sale if you click over from our site (at no cost to you). None of our affiliate commission links are direct relationships with specific gear companies or shopping carts, instead we remain removed by using a third party who manages all our affiliate sales and relationships. We also sell display "banner" advertising, in this case our relationships are closer to the companies who advertise, but our display advertising income is carefully separated financially and editorially from our blog content, over which we always maintain 100% editorial control -- we make this clear during every advertising deal we work out. Please also notice we do the occasional "sponsored" post, these are under similar financial arrangements as our banner advertising, only the banner or other type of reference to a company are included in the blog post, simply to show they provided financial support to WildSnow.com and provide them with advertising in return. Unlike most other "sponsored content" you find on the internet, our sponsored posts are entirely under our editorial control and created by WildSnow specific writers.See our full disclosures here.

    Backcountry skiing is dangerous. You may be killed or severely injured if you do any form of ski mountaineering, skimo randonnee and randonnée skiing. The information and news on this website is intended only as general information. Due to human error and passing time, the information, text and images contained within this website may be inaccurate, false, or out-of-date. By using, reading or viewing the information provided on this website, you agree to absolve the owners of Wild Snow as well as content contributors of any liability for injuries or losses incurred while using such information. Furthermore, you agree to use any of this website's information, maps, photos, or binding mounting instructions templates at your own risk, and waive Wild Snow owners and contributors of liability for use of said items for ski touring or any other use.

    Switch To Mobile Version