– The Backcountry Ski Touring Blog
  • Avalanches
  • Gear Reviews
    • Ski Reviews
    • Boot Reviews
    • Binding Reviews
    • Snowboard Splitboard
    • Book Reviews
    • Avalanche Beacon Reviews
    • Airbag Backpacks
    • Backcountry Electronics
    • Misc Gear Reviews
  • Podcast
  • Tips & Tricks
    • Ski Touring Basics
    • Boot Fitting
    • Fitness & Health
    • Gear Mods
  • Trip Reports
    • Fourteeners
    • Huts – Cabins – Lodges
    • Denali McKinley
    • 8,000 Meter Skiing
  • Stories
    • History
    • Humor
    • Land Use Issues
    • Evergreen Ski Touring
    • Poetry
  • Resources
    • All Posts Listed
    • 100 Recent Comments
    • Backcountry Skiing & Ski Touring Webcams
    • Ski Weights Comparison
    • Archives of WildSnow.com
    • Authors Page
    • Ski Touring Bindings
      • Trab TR2 Index and FAQ
      • Salomon Guardian & Tracker
      • Naxo Backcountry Skiing Bindings – Info Index
      • Silvretta Pure Backcountry Skiing Bindings – Info Index
      • Marker F10-12 Duke Baron
      • G3 Onyx Ski Binding FAQ
      • G3 ION Ski Touring Binding
      • Fritschi Backcountry Skiing Bindings – Info Index
      • Fritschi Diamir Frame Bindings Mount DIY
      • Fritschi Diamir Bindings FAQ
      • Fritschi Tecton FAQ
      • Atomic Salomon Backland MTN
      • Dynafit Tri-Step Binding 2001-2003
      • Naxo randonnee alpine touring AT ski binding FAQ
      • Dynafit Skiing Bindings – Info Index
      • Dynafit Binding Frequently Asked Questions FAQ
      • Dynafit Beast 16 FAQ Review 1
      • Dynafit Beast 16 FAQ Page Two
    • History
      • Ski Touring Binding Museum
      • Trooper Traverse Intro & Index
      • Randonnee Ski Touring “AT” ski gear — What is Hip?
      • Chronology
    • Backcountry Skiing Core Glossary
    • Gear Review Policy & Disclosures

– The Backcountry Ski Touring Blog

Banner
  • Avalanches
  • Gear Reviews
    • Ski Reviews
    • Boot Reviews
    • Binding Reviews
    • Snowboard Splitboard
    • Book Reviews
    • Avalanche Beacon Reviews
    • Airbag Backpacks
    • Backcountry Electronics
    • Misc Gear Reviews
  • Podcast
  • Tips & Tricks
    • Ski Touring Basics
    • Boot Fitting
    • Fitness & Health
    • Gear Mods
  • Trip Reports
    • Fourteeners
    • Huts – Cabins – Lodges
    • Denali McKinley
    • 8,000 Meter Skiing
  • Stories
    • History
    • Humor
    • Land Use Issues
    • Evergreen Ski Touring
    • Poetry
  • Resources
    • All Posts Listed
    • 100 Recent Comments
    • Backcountry Skiing & Ski Touring Webcams
    • Ski Weights Comparison
    • Archives of WildSnow.com
    • Authors Page
    • Ski Touring Bindings
      • Trab TR2 Index and FAQ
      • Salomon Guardian & Tracker
      • Naxo Backcountry Skiing Bindings – Info Index
      • Silvretta Pure Backcountry Skiing Bindings – Info Index
      • Marker F10-12 Duke Baron
      • G3 Onyx Ski Binding FAQ
      • G3 ION Ski Touring Binding
      • Fritschi Backcountry Skiing Bindings – Info Index
      • Fritschi Diamir Frame Bindings Mount DIY
      • Fritschi Diamir Bindings FAQ
      • Fritschi Tecton FAQ
      • Atomic Salomon Backland MTN
      • Dynafit Tri-Step Binding 2001-2003
      • Naxo randonnee alpine touring AT ski binding FAQ
      • Dynafit Skiing Bindings – Info Index
      • Dynafit Binding Frequently Asked Questions FAQ
      • Dynafit Beast 16 FAQ Review 1
      • Dynafit Beast 16 FAQ Page Two
    • History
      • Ski Touring Binding Museum
      • Trooper Traverse Intro & Index
      • Randonnee Ski Touring “AT” ski gear — What is Hip?
      • Chronology
    • Backcountry Skiing Core Glossary
    • Gear Review Policy & Disclosures
   

NIMBY, or USFS Research Spy Camera?

by Lou Dawson June 15, 2012
written by Lou Dawson June 15, 2012

You’re enjoying a nice hiking trail. A bit primitive, a bit controversial due to proposed land exchange in the area. Perhaps the USFS hung up this motion activated camera pointed in your face as you come around a bend. Perhaps the trail is a thorn in the side of nearby NIMBYs and they’re doing their own cowboy spycraft. Either way, is this wilderness or weirdness? Anyone in this area of Colorado know the story? We called the USFS and got voicemail for about eight people.

Spy camera.

Spy camera.

Ostensibly, a USFS research camera would be identified with a tag or name written on it. If not, it’s probably an illegal installation. Disappointing either way, really.

46 comments
0
FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
previous post
Guess That Colorado Wildflower
next post
Smartwool Tops – Lisa and Lou Review

46 comments

AndyC June 15, 2012 - 5:46 pm

FWIW. These cameras are becoming quite common and are often used by private entities such as hunters and non-profit conservation groups and by public agencies such as university, state, and federal (Forest Service, Fish&Wildlife Service, USGS, etc.) researchers studying everything from visitor use intensity to wildlife diversity. I agree that if it was a federal agency camera there would be a label on it–but perhaps on the side against the tree. I doubt if it is illegal for a hunter, conservationist, or student to install cameras if the installation was temporary and non-damaging.

Tina June 15, 2012 - 5:48 pm

It is most likely a camera trap for wildlife, my guess would be lynx based on the height and location. It’s not filming, but rather taking individual pictures… although I realize that it could still be disconcerting. It doesn’t necessarily have to be labeled, depending on who deployed it (university researcher, etc) but I am surprised that on a trail there wouldn’t be some kind of note on the camera box itself.

Tim June 15, 2012 - 6:03 pm

Is this from your outing to the proposed Wexner swap parcel? These things are pretty cool, not sure its presence alone signals anything malicious – then again, the “hidden hand” is tricky like that.

Lou June 15, 2012 - 6:34 pm

Tim, yeah, we were up there again today. Found some super nice and well used trails leading way into the BLM, including an overlook over the Lions Mane formation. See photos here: http://www.facebook.com/SuteyLandExchangeFacts?ref=ts

I think it’s about 50/50 that it’s either benign, or something a NIMBY put there, due to some clues I can’t get into. We’re trying to find out.

byates1 June 15, 2012 - 6:59 pm

i have a small peach tree in my back yard

for the last 2 years, someone has stolen about 30 peaches off the tree, perfectly ripe harvest time.

this year, a camera is going in, i will catch the thief, and mail the photo to my small town newspaper.

the great peach caper will be solved!

Ryan Stefani June 15, 2012 - 7:59 pm

In any case, I’d have to venture out on a limb and say time and time again, nature has proven that when managed, things go wrongly. A little monkey wrenchin’ seems in order…

Nathan B June 15, 2012 - 8:52 pm

Put up another camera to watch that camera… see who comes to pick it up.

Lou June 15, 2012 - 10:20 pm

Okay you guys, this weekend, informal contest to see who comes up with the best idea of how to handle the camera. Someone said I should whip it out and water it, but that seemed a bit much. Any other ideas that involve less exposure (grin)?

denisseattle June 15, 2012 - 10:49 pm

Dang, now I have to wear a disguise when I go back for my camera! Maybe I can borrow the gorilla suit from the guy outside the mattress store…

Jackson Henri June 15, 2012 - 10:51 pm

Perhaps a message spelled out on several large signs while you do a sexy little dance while wearing a Nixon mask, short-sleeved speed suit, and cape? Don’t forget the aluminum foil beanie as well!
Also, don’t read too much into the string of voice mailboxes you got. Nearly all USFS personel have either primary or secondary duties as fire fighters. I’m sure you’ve seen the news and noticed the snowpack this year. Most of the guys and gals I know haven’t had more than two days of in the last month, and zero office days in that time. They’ll get back to you given the time!

Frank K June 16, 2012 - 7:43 am

Didn’t the FS (or the Wilderness Workshop) place cameras on a trail on Smuggler last summer, trying to catch bikers on it? This could be the same thing, trying to catch MTB’s if it isn’t an officially sanctioned trail. Hikers, of course, have full reign to walk anywhere they want.

Chase Harrison June 16, 2012 - 8:12 am

There is a camera at the Snowmass end of West Government. Poachers beware.

Lou June 16, 2012 - 8:22 am

Not much fun being spied on… Frank, yeah, this could well be a USFS thing but I’ve been told when they do it, it would be marked. This one has some factors that indicate it’s privately owned. I’ll bet it’s gone the next time we look.

martin June 16, 2012 - 9:26 am

Maybe a bear ate the sign.

I was going out to do some nude hiking this afternoon, but now I’m not so sure.

naginalf June 16, 2012 - 10:41 am

Hmm, expensive waterproof outdoor motion capture camera hanging on a tree on public land with no discernible markings to indicate the owner or anything saying “return to x”? Sounds like a free camera to me.

John Gloor June 16, 2012 - 11:01 am

@ Frank K. The Forest Service talked about maybe stationing cameras on that trail, but then said it was not in their budget to monitor it and asked the public to stay off of the trail. I do not know if the Wilderness workshop did anything. A couple of years prior I ran into a girl GPSing the trails up there for the wilderness Workshop. This was years before they notified the forest service about trails up there.

Lou June 16, 2012 - 11:09 am

Mapping trails so they can close them. Back in 1970 on Earth Day, who knew it would all lead to that?

John, I don’t think they were referring to this exact trail when they made recommendations for use, it’s not on the Travel Management Plan maps… But I’d imagine there are various powers, from nearby private land owners to Wilderness Workshop fanatics, who would like it shut down to humans, or at least public humans.

BTW, it’s pretty obvious when you’re up there that at least one nearby local is probably using it as their own personal horseback riding trail.

Lou

ptor June 16, 2012 - 1:57 pm

Agenda 21???

mtnrunner2 June 16, 2012 - 3:38 pm

If it’s public land, I can’t imagine what purpose images of hikers would serve to Wexner.

The only time I’ve seen one was in Boulder for wildlife purposes. I gave the peace sign and a goofy face every time I ran by it (other gestures and behaviors did occur to me as well).

Then there was the sign on a public social trail in my neighborhood that said something like “I know you’re pooping here, and there’s a hidden camera so don’t do it again”. Definitely the tin-foil-hat variety. Also thought of taping a scat identification sheet to help them out since they seem to lack knowledge in that area.

I do like the second camera idea 🙂

Canadian June 16, 2012 - 4:41 pm

Perhaps a bit of paranoia? Although, maybe it is related to the conflict in your area, up here there are a growing number of ordinary folks using these cameras to document wildlife on our properties and on trails on public land. My cameras have never recorded people (yet), as we live in a sparsely used rural area, but it is fascinating to see how many wolves, coyotes, bears, moose and elk are using the same trails that we regularly walk. I was inspired by the Parks Canada clip with a year’s worth of images from a trail in Banff park.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9MiVWM3SZAY

Also, these cameras are important research tools that document the successes of such initiatives as the multiple overpasses and underpasses on the Trans Canada Highway through Banff Park. Check out the highway wilding youtubes.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9o38p4L-WOk&feature=plcp

Lou June 16, 2012 - 4:50 pm

Canadian, in many cases you could say paranoia, but in this case, I’m pretty sure the camera was placed to document people, not animals. Personally, I’m not that fond of having my picture taken every time I walk by the thing, and being used for who-knows-what purposes.

Good point about wildlife using trails along with people. I see it all the time. I see the tracks all the time. Kind of makes a joke out of when the USFS and BLM decide they don’t like a trail and “decommission” it. Tell that to the elk and deer. Ridiculous. Some of the most beat out trails I’ve ever seen were mostly used by elk…, and you should see the damage in some places around here done by mountain sheep, dozens of threaded and eroded trails on one tundra slope, for example. Lou

Dan June 16, 2012 - 7:04 pm

Canadian: Thanks for the great links. Reminds me of the old Singing Pass Trail by Whistler before Blackcomb ski area was hatched. More than occasionally, we would have to move off the trail to avoid an oncoming black bear…heading for the dump (about where the village is located now). Although, not quite the number and variety of Banff wildlife.

tka June 16, 2012 - 9:50 pm

Why don’t you just leave it as you found it? Like a gate or you know, not be paranoid, and actually think for once that somebody is not out to get you….. So what if a camera is there? Are you supposed to be on that trail or aren’t you? Sounds to me that your actions are suspicious, and about to be more so. If you are using that area legally, well then, maybe someone is trying to better understand how to manage the land. It’s really none of your business. Leave it be so as to expose your…..motives.

Scott June 16, 2012 - 10:48 pm

Maybe Victoria’s Secret forgot one of their cameras after doing the special wilderness undies photo shoot for their upcoming “Taking Over Mt. Sopris” catalog….

Patrick June 16, 2012 - 11:06 pm

Thanks Canadian for the youtube links. I’ve seen those before, and many other remote camera shots of wildlife gathered by wildlife research colleagues.

I do like Scott’s warm thought about the Victoria’s Secret photo shoot. Wonder if there’ve been remote cameras used in -Bare- Creek outside Telluride.

😉 If only the US military had a few more of those cameras in I-Rack. For sure, the Weapons of Mass Destruction would have been found. Maybe such military cameras would even have captured images of Elvis.

Lou, about trail closures — In many instances, the public land trail closures (or trail decommissioning) relate to conservation of wildlife, to reduce human intrusion into sensitive habitat, and to reduce human-wildlife interactions (which might be dangerous for both humans who might get attacked and the critter who may be killed as a result). These conservation reasons are not -ridiculous-.
Keep in mind the critters you no longer see in CO, such as grizzlies and wolverines.

Lou June 17, 2012 - 5:50 am

TKA, actually, it is our business because it’s public land and people are not supposed to just go around installing equipment on the trails without a permit from the Forest Service. At the least, it’s ugly. At the worst, it’s an invasion of privacy. (And note, the person taking the pictures has made it their business, so what’s wrong with us making their camera on public land our business?) No issue with us being on that trail, it’s well used and legal. But it’s indeed a controversial trail because it’s not “official” and leads to the BLM land that may be privatized and closed, and it’s also a trail that is mostly in use by nearby locals, some of whom I suspect would rather it was an informal unknown trail they could pretty much use as their own private resource.

The issue of “official” USFS numbered trails is actually quite interesting. There are literally thousands of miles of game trails and “unofficial” human trails in this National Forest. No law against walking on those trails unless you’re in a closed area of some sort, or they’ve actually discovered one of the unofficial trails, mapped it, and declared it closed. Even in the case of trails they close and “decommission” the game still use them, and if the trail takes a logical route it frequently remains in use anyway, especially during hunting season. Overall this is a strange issue that’s more bureaucratic than anything real on the ground. If nothing else, the weirdness is if they “close” a trail, you can just walk through the nearby forest to get to the same place, just as long as you’re not on the trail. My take is we need more trails and the USFS and BLM should designate more trails. But they tend to close them rather than build them.

steveG June 17, 2012 - 6:31 am

What to do? Wear a Wildsnow.com tee shirt. Approach the camera. Put your hand up to your ear with your pinkie and thumb out as a telephone. Mouth the words, “Call me” “Lou”.

Lou June 17, 2012 - 7:57 am

We tried that while wearing a WildSnow speedo, still have not heard back.

Ben 2 June 17, 2012 - 1:14 pm

If there’s any chance that it’s a legitimate wildlife research camera I wouldn’t mess with it, or advocate messing with such things (although I think they are usually clearly labeled with identifiers, you never know). There are a couple of regulars on Supertopo who have posted about having research cameras vandalized or stolen, and it sucks for the poor researcher or student who loses both equipment and data.

Sure it detracts from my wilderness experience to see a box tied to a tree, on the other hand the pre-existing trail and my presence are already signs it’s not fully wild, as well.

John Gloor June 17, 2012 - 2:16 pm

Lou you wrote, “John, I don’t think they were referring to this exact trail when they made recommendations for use, it’s not on the Travel Management Plan maps… But I’d imagine there are various powers, from nearby private land owners to Wilderness Workshop fanatics, who would like it shut down to humans, or at least public humans.”

I was referring to the Balcony Trail above smuggler, in response to Frank’s query about that trail.

Lou June 17, 2012 - 2:39 pm

Oh, ok, I’m speaking of the trails on the north flanks of Mt. Sopris, mid to high elevation. Lots of bureaucratic energy seems to be directed to only having one human or two human USFS trails in that whole area, which is ridiculous, there should be twice that many at least.

Jefferson June 17, 2012 - 2:38 pm

Lou,

If this device were USFS or some other government agency it would be marked as such along with contact information and a warning of penalties for tampering. It isn’t, so I would say that it’s both private and illegal. If you are not inclined to block the lens – which would probably bring its owner in a day or so, do you have a remote camera of your own? – you should visually inspect the device, taking serial #s, and call the police to have it removed immediately.

Jefferson June 17, 2012 - 2:39 pm

Lou,

If this device were owned or sanctioned by a government agency it would be marked as such along with contact information and a warning of penalties for tampering. It isn’t, so I would say that it’s both private and illegal.

If you are not inclined to block the lens – which would probably bring its owner in a day or so, do you have a remote camera of your own? – you should visually inspect the device, taking serial #s, and call the police to have it removed immediately.

Lou June 17, 2012 - 2:50 pm

Jefferson, that’s exactly the approach I thought we should take. I’d imagine it’s gone by now as I think the owner probably saw our postings, but if not hopefully one of the people hiking up there this weekend will handle it. Meanwhile, we expect to be speaking with USFS officials tomorrow. The folks who’d remove it would be USFS law enforcement rangers.

Adam Olson June 18, 2012 - 6:58 am

I would gather the camera myself and put a lost and found add in the local paper: “This was found on public land, please call and claim”. Leaving anything in the woods is subject to being “found”.

Dan June 18, 2012 - 9:40 am

USFS “law enforcement” Rangers? A classic oxymoron.

Lou June 18, 2012 - 9:50 am

LOL, but yeah, they do have a couple of guys who patrol.

SB June 18, 2012 - 11:32 am

If its not labeled, treat it like abandoned property or trash. Remove it and throw it away.

brian h June 18, 2012 - 12:04 pm

just throwing in .2 cents- is it possible someone is trying to track a big bull or a buck? I’d say most hunters are going to place t.c’s away from hiking trails and it is a little early for that sort of thing but if the animal is big enough, dudes will get a little looney…

Lou June 18, 2012 - 12:23 pm

From some clues, I doubt it Brian, but good thought. Lou

Tim June 18, 2012 - 12:52 pm

These types of cameras seem to have a short life span in southern Arizona/New Mex and northern Mex where biologists are using them to study a small borderlands Jaguar population on trails utilized by Jags and drug mules alike. Apparently neither species is fond of being photographed!

Phil June 18, 2012 - 2:51 pm

What could happen actually just happened in Austria this month:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/austria/9334182/Wildlife-camera-catches-Austrian-politician-having-sex-in-forest.html

Although I guess this is not a problem backcountry skiers should be concerned about, as winter temperatures and deep powder snow would make this highly uncomfortable…

Crazy Horse June 19, 2012 - 1:56 pm

Them thar things don’t last very long up her in Cowboy Cuntry. We wuz just about running out of road signs when them Birkenstockers started givin us some neu thangs to shoot at. :wink

Spy cams January 28, 2013 - 5:23 am

I do agree with you that it is disappointing.If it is being used for a research purpose by USFS then there should be a tag or name .

Emily January 24, 2015 - 7:52 pm

I am concerned very concerned……..living adjacent to or surrounded by NF all of my life I was dosed with my first reality when told a USFS camera was placed on our ranches boundary to spy on our horseback riders. Trails are one of the most beautiful and primitive ways to travel. Nearly all major routes in America today were once elk, buffalo, deer, Indians or other user made trails.
It is only natural for those that love the outdoors to be intrigued and want to follow the lure of a beautiful trail especially un-groomed the excitement of that something special around every bend and should be able to do so at will on ALL of the peoples land. I am sad and tired to witness our loss of freedom but so very grateful to have been born and raised in a time that I truly know what freedom was and what all of us have let them take.. I am looking for the best device to find these spy cameras……is nothing sacred can one never be truly alone with nature?

linda May 25, 2015 - 2:14 pm

Emily , you are so right and you are but a few of us that are left who know what our constitution and bill of rights are for…..the others have because of ignorance gave what you and I are fighting to keep and were lucky to have experienced real freedom and liberty……..the USFS have put cameras at our ranches boundarys to film horseback riders and I was stunned to find this out…..we have always been hard working upstanding American citizens and now find we are fighting for our way of life as the USFS have taken 70% of all the existing roads in our area away from all that love to see the forest in a free to travel way….then they have now said we must keep our horses on theses roads that are left and designated motorized traffic. Is there a word beyond stupidity and abuse of power. This is completely illegal for them to close ANY existing roads of which our tax money has paid to construct to any travel unless of dangerous and unusual circumstances. This is just the tip of the iceburg and I too am hunting for a device to find and shoot down any spy device in the forest I can find. Please mail me back if you hear of anything. We must stop this Gov Tyranny at the root. I am in Oregon and have always lived on ranches bordered by Gov land and until now have been quite content to live a harsh but beautiful free life.

Comments are closed.

Recent Comments

  • VTskier on Voluntary PIEPS Beacon Recall Issued in Europe, Plans for US
  • Tuck on The Bunion Solution — Extreme Mod For Wide Feet
  • mario renzi on Light(ish) & Robust — 2021/22 Fischer Transalp First Look
  • Tom on The Bunion Solution — Extreme Mod For Wide Feet
  • Travis on Ski Touring Boots 2021-22 — Upgrades to Past Favs

Gear Reviews

  • Light(ish) & Robust — 2021/22 Fischer Transalp First Look

    February 18, 2021
  • Skis From the Future — 2021/22 Is All About the Freeride

    February 11, 2021
  • An Education on the Ephemeral Glide — Bases, Wax and DPS Phantom

    February 4, 2021

Trip Reports

  • Making Turns and Skintracks at Bluebird Backcountry

    February 24, 2021
  • Celebrating the Low Danger, Low Angle Ski Tour

    February 16, 2021
  • Cooke City in Photos — Montana Trip Report

    January 29, 2021

Totally Deep Podcast

  • Drinking Beer with the Bench Girls — Totally Deep Podcast 84

    February 12, 2021
  • Griffin Post Stays Home — Totally Deep Podcast 83

    January 10, 2021
  • Risky Business — Zahan Billimoria on Solving for Z

    December 14, 2020

Tips & Tricks

  • Celebrating the Low Danger, Low Angle Ski Tour

    February 16, 2021
  • Warm Toes for Cold Smoke — Tips To Keep Your Feet Toasty

    February 8, 2021
  • The Five Pillars of Skintrack Wisdom

    December 17, 2020

Ski Touring Stories

  • Envisioning a Friendly, Busier Backcountry — Shaun Deutschlander Q&A

    January 18, 2021
  • Giving Myself the Gift of Backcountry

    January 15, 2021
  • Six Who Dared — Elk Mountains Traverse & Richard Compton Tribute

    January 7, 2021

Newsletter Sign-Up

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • About Lou Dawson
  • Authors Page
  • About
  • Contact
  • Copyright & Legal
  • Website Security

@2020 - All Rights Reserved. Designed and Developed by WildSnow


Back To Top

Read alsox

Envisioning a Friendly, Busier Backcountry —...

January 18, 2021

Happy Holidays and Powder Turns from...

December 25, 2020

Solving For Z Review and the...

December 21, 2020