Avalanche Survey — Results


Post by WildSnow.com blogger | July 2, 2012      

Thanks to everyone who took the avalanche survey I posted a while ago. More than 770 of you responded! I’m no statistician, and I learned a ton from making this survey (it was a college project). Some of the questions could have been worded better, but I didn’t change them after people began filling it out, so as to not skew the results.

The survey confirmed a lot of the things I’ve always assumed about the backcountry skiing community, and also gave unique insights I used for a prototype idea that involved taking the first step in “research driven design.” Click on the thumbnails to view the results, apologies in advance if our image enlarger doesn’t work for you (it works for nearly every browser/computer combination, but sometimes folks have problems with it.) We had to keep the results as jpeg screen shots since converting them to HTML tables that fit our blog design would have been a monumental task.

Question one: How would you describe your experience level? (Multiple answers can be selected, i.e. if you are a guide with level 3 AIARE). Rate either based on experience, course level, or both (i.e. if you have many years of experience, but no formal courses, you could choose expert)

This question is the main one that could have been worded much better. The results might have been skewed toward the third option because many backcountry skiers have little to no “official” avy education, even if they have a wealth of experience.

Backcountry skiing avalanche survey

Question two: What tools do you normally carry (and actually use) for avalanche safety? Check all that apply.

Backcountry skiing avalanche survey

Question three: How often do you do the following for pre-trip planning?

Backcountry skiing avalanche survey

Question four: What avalanche mitigation/evaluation techniques do you use? How often?

Backcountry skiing avalanche survey

Question five: How often do you ski one at a time?

Backcountry skiing avalanche survey

Question six: During a day in avalanche terrain, what information is the most important to you? Drag and drop to rate according to importance.

The results for this question are hard to interpret. Also, the results might have been skewed since the method for answering this question was hard to understand. As far as I can tell, the simplified results are below, rated from most to least important, I could be interpreting it completely wrong, and the results might not actually mean anything. Question 7 perhaps does a better job of gathering this sort of information.

1. Slope angle
2. Nearby avalanche activity
3. Wind direction speed/history
4. Snow accumulation history
5. Snowpack layer bonding
6. Solar radiation history
7. Snowpack layer hardness
8. Snowpack layer density
9. Snowpack layer thickness
10. Snowpack layer temperature
11. Snow depth
12. Partners risk acceptance level
13. Slope history

Backcountry skiing avalanche survey

Question seven: If you could have better quality (i.e. quicker, more accurate, more often) of any kind of avalanche safety related data, what would it be?

Backcountry skiing avalanche survey

In summary:
It was encouraging to see how many people still skied one-at-a-time, despite the seeming trend (gleaned from observing accidents worldwide) against this most basic principle of safety.

You might also notice that of the many techniques used to evaluate hazard, that of examining snow layers is ever popular in backcountry skiing. But methods of observing snow layers are either primitive (ski pole probe), or time consuming (pit profiles). While all areas of avalanche safety are open for improvement, in my view the survey shows that new gear or techniques for evaluating snow layering could be of top importance.

As we’ve previously written about here on WildSnow.com, perhaps the days of avalanche beacons being viewed as the ultimate mojo of avalanche survival are behind us, and new safety devices are on the horizon? The growing popularity of airbag backpacks testifies, but how about gear that helps keep you out of avalanches in the first place?

Comments

9 Responses to “Avalanche Survey — Results”

  1. Rick July 2nd, 2012 12:49 pm

    Cool survey Louie with some thought provoking results!! Have you considered sharing some of this info at the ISSW or publish in TAR??

  2. Scott Davenport July 2nd, 2012 2:00 pm

    Filling out the questionnaire was interesting. I have been in one avalanche in bounds after season a few years back. It is good to go through especially when you come out the other side safe. It made me more cautious visually – the signs were there I didn’t know what to look for at the time. Thanks for the input.

  3. Ryan July 2nd, 2012 2:01 pm

    Very cool results. I’ve been looking forward to this.

    One suggestion though…

    For the questions where we (the respondents) could select more than one answer, you should change the percentages so that they reflect the number of people who responded positively to that option out of the number of people who completed that question. When you add the percentages up, they will probably exceed 100%. My guess is that more that 17% of respondents carry a shovel into the backcountry.

  4. Dave P. July 2nd, 2012 2:52 pm

    Lou, could you please clarify the results of question 2? Is it really true, as it appears from the graphic, that fewer than 20% of respondents carry a shovel, probe and beacon into the backcountry. If so, that is shocking!

  5. Louie July 2nd, 2012 4:49 pm

    The survey software I used has a few issues. It wasn’t able to interpret question number two very well, since people could choose more than one option. The percentages don’t mean much, if anything. The numbers, however, do, they denote how many people chose which option. i.e. 817 people (all the respondents) said they carried a shovel. Sorry for the confusion, might be good if I just cropped the confusing numbers off the side of the image…

  6. David B July 2nd, 2012 5:48 pm

    Louie, could you please invent a probe that provides a layer reading when inserted into the snowpack. We could possibly receive the reading via a smartphone or high tech tranceiver.
    The time and effort required to thoroughly assess the snowpack is generally the prohibiting factor in doing so.
    Make it simple and more people will take the time to do the assessment properly or at all.

  7. Forest July 3rd, 2012 7:03 am

    Hmmm, must be some way to glean some useful layer strength information from a (~3″) core sample??

  8. Jim July 4th, 2012 12:51 am

    Louie, You should use the percentage of the people answering the question for each category. Not sue what the percentage is, but it looks like percent of all the possible answers.

  9. Ian July 13th, 2012 6:00 pm

    It might sound a bit Space 1999ish (think pommy Star Trek) but I reckon a radar type contraption that could scan the snow in front of you as you skin up. Then when you’re at the top it could scan the whole slope and detect hot spots to keep away from.
    At the end of the day no matter how elaborate the device people will still die because our brains aren’t honest. That’s something we all have to work on. Some more than others.

Got something to say? Please do so.





Anti-Spam Quiz:

You can subscribe to comment notification by checking the box to left, but you must leave a brief comment to do so, which records your email and requires you to use our anti-spam challange. If you don't like leaving substantive comments that's fine, just leave a simple comment that says something like "thanks, subscribed" with a made-up name. Check the comment subscription checkbox BEFORE you submit.
If you need an emoticon for a comment just copy/paste off the following list, or use text code you might be familiar with.

:D    :-)    :(    :lol:    :x    :P    :oops:    :cry:    :evil:    :twisted:    :roll:    :wink:    :!:    :?:    :idea:    :arrow:   
  
Due to comment spam we moderate most comments. Please do not submit your comment twice -- it will appear shortly after approval. Comments with one or more links in the text may be held in moderation, for spam prevention. If you'd like to publish a photo in a comment, contact us. Guidelines: Be civil, no personal attacks, avoid vulgarity and profanity.

  Your Comments

  • atfred: Kristian, re sticky skins, fresh ski wax job helped much. Thanks!...
  • Lou Dawson 2: Marcus I'd call them similar. In fact, Ultimate was clearly designed to com...
  • Lou Dawson 2: Jeremy, I'm thinking of boots such as TLT7 that weight just under a kilo, a...
  • Steeplechase: Three questions for the review(s): 1) Setting weight aside, how well do ...
  • Jeremy C: A slight inconsistency in your weight requirements. The Hawx Ultra XTD 130...
  • Marcus: Could you compare the backland ultimate to a Dynafit PDG boot in stiffness?...
  • Lou Dawson 2: Thanks Ross, that's probably a typo. Good eye! They're 27/27.5, I'll edit....
  • Ross: If your Ultra XTD's have a 312mm BSL they are probably size 27/27.5, not 28...
  • Taylor: Great write up. I agree with everything said. With regard to quick turn...
  • Lou Dawson 2: Jay, not at all. There might be another Arcteryx or Salomon boot they're si...
  • Lou Dawson 2: Matus, yeah, that's the issue with most good skiers in terms of whether a t...
  • jay: These backland carbon/ultimate boots are the same boots as the procline rig...
  • Matus: I just set both values a bit higher than I think I need and leave it as it ...
  • Lou Dawson 2: Rudi and Matus, it's possible the lobes on binding heels such as MTN could ...
  • Matus: Re polls: Filtering is a good thing if you want it. And re manipulation - d...
  • Rudi: I have been skiing on a U spring binding all season. The only releases I've...
  • Lou Dawson 2: Matus, indeed, I've stated many times that if tech bindings were as bad as ...
  • Matus: I am 82 Kg / 181 cm (naked:) and have all binding set to 7-8 (whatever this...
  • Lou Dawson 2: The Backland-MTN U springs have a cap on the end that's easy to remove, and...
  • Werner Koch: Jim: Thanks, seems you are doing everything right already ; ) www.contours...
  • XXX_er: When losing is not an option different boots for different disciplines, dif...
  • trollanski: Matus. The information on the binding is fairly cryptic at this point becau...
  • Jim Milstein: Back to those tasty skins. Werner, I got the Contour Hybrids early fall...
  • Terrance: aemono, https://www.thenewamerican.com/tech/environment/item/18300-climate...
  • Kristian: " Perhaps I can get a scientist to write a blog post to get it started." ...
  • Lou Dawson 2: I think we're getting close to this post thread getting hijacked, since we'...
  • Lou Dawson 2: http://www.onlinecollegecourses.com/2012/01/24/15-famous-thinkers-who-could...
  • aemono: Hey Terrance, you did put together some nice 'articles' for Bruno. That was...
  • Werner Koch: Hi, thanks, glad to hear. Regarding water, just get used to wipe off the ba...
  • Jim Milstein: Hi Werner, I like the Contour Hybrid skins a lot. Good glide, good grip. Ea...

  Recent Posts


Welcome to Louis (Lou) Dawson's backcountry skiing information & opinion website. Lou's passion for the past 50 years has been alpinism, climbing, mountaineering and skiing -- along with all manner of outdoor recreation. He has authored numerous books and articles about ski touring and is well known as the first person to ski down all 54 of Colorado's 14,000-foot peaks, otherwise known as the Fourteeners! Books and free ski touring news and information here.

All material on this website is copyrighted, the name WildSnow is trademarked, permission required for reproduction (electronic or otherwise) and display on other websites. PLEASE SEE OUR COPYRIGHT and TRADEMARK INFORMATION.

Backcountry skiing is dangerous. You may be killed or severely injured if you do any form of ski mountaineering, skimo randonnee and randonnée skiing. The information and news on this website is intended only as general information. While the authors and editors of the information on this website make every effort to present useful information about ski mountaineering, due to human error the information, text and images contained within this website may be inaccurate, false, or out-of-date. By using, reading or viewing the information provided on this website, you agree to absolve the owners of Wild Snow as well as content contributors of any liability for injuries or losses incurred while using such information. Furthermore, you agree to use any of this website's information, maps, photos, or binding mounting instructions templates at your own risk, and waive Wild Snow owners and contributors of liability for use of said items for ski touring or any other use.

Switch To Mobile Version