Cilogear 45 liter WorkSack Review

Post by blogger | August 16, 2011      

A light pack is an excellent way to reduce weight while not sacrificing much safety or utility. Cilogear is perfect for this, as they make simple, light backpacks that are well designed and last forever. As a bonus, Cilogear rucks are hand made in Portland, resulting in enhanced customer service and quality controlled workmanship.

Backcountry ski equipment in the North Cascades

45 liter WorkSack partially compressed on Mt. Baker.

The first Cilogear pack I used was their cavernous 75 liter WorkSack. It worked great for Denali, and a few other trips as well. While 75 liters in name, the 75 is considerably bigger when taking into account the expansion collar, hence it is too huge for anything but a multiday trip with tons of gear. Of the packs I own, the next size down is 35 liters. That’s great for day trips, and I’ve made it work for several overnights, but for a while I’ve been feeling the need for a slightly bigger pack in the 40-50 liter range that’ll be easier to pack for overnights but also work well as an alpine day-pack.

Since I liked the 75 liter WorkSack so much, I decided to try out the 45 model. Cilogear’s worksacks are intended for climbing, rather than ski mountaineering, but this results in a light, durable pack which is exactly what I want for spring skiing.

All Cilogear’s WorkSacks are similar in design, and use many of the same features They have figured out a formula that works well, and apply it to a wide range of pack sizes, from 20 liters all the way to 75. The 45 lacks the crampon pouch found on other Cilogear packs, and also has lighter fabric on some sections. A few other small changes make the 45 very light, in fact lighter than the 40 liter, which has more features.

Equipment for backcountry skiing and ski mountaineering

The Cilogear 45 is a traditional top loader design with a lid, consisting of one large main compartment, one small interior pocket, and two pockets in the lid. I don’t like packs that have too many pockets, both for weight considerations and the fact that I tend to lose stuff if I have a arsenal of pockets to root through. The 45 has a nice balance of pockets, allowing for easy organization. The “ninja pocket” in the interior of the pack is great for keeping stuff that is small and you need to be able to find quickly, but also won’t need throughout the day, such as a headlamp and repair kit. I keep my food and miscellaneous smaller items in the lid for easy access. The pack of course lacks a shovel pocket, so it is a little awkward storing a shovel blade inside. However it is manageable, and on many spring and summer ski trips I leave the shovel at home. Cilogear does make a shovel pocket that clips to the outside of the pack, although I haven’t had a chance to try it.

Equipment for backcountry skiing and ski mountaineering

The 45 liter WorkSack with both sides compressed and with the lid removed, just the right size for some runs on Mount Adams, Washington.

Equipment for backcountry skiing and ski mountaineering

Detail of the Dee-clip system, what makes the Cilogear packs so versatile.

The genius of the Cilogear packs is their versatility. Nearly everything can be removed, transforming the pack to a simple sack with straps, a full-on load carrying machine, or anything in between. This does take a little experimentation, and I am still trying different configurations for different trips. For skiing I like my pack to be compact and not flop around, so I while I could leave some of the exterior straps at home, I’ve kept them on the pack for many of my trips.

During a day-trip I did take the hard plastic frame out. Doing so worked well until I put my skis and boots on the outside of the pack. After that the extra weight and leverage made it quite uncomfortable as the sack gradually compressed and curved throughout the day without something inside to stiffen it vertically.

The 45 can be compressed into almost any conceivable volume. For day trips without much gear I have been compressing both sides fully, and storing the lid inside the pack, reducing volume to something like 20 liters.

With all the straps and the frame in the Cilogear 45, it carries loads amazingly well. It has basically the same suspension system as the 75 liter pack, and it shows. I’ve had the 45 fully loaded with 2 liters of water and skis and boots, and it felt fantastic. I would however prefer the foam in the shoulder straps to be a little stiffer, as they appear to be softer compared to the 75. Even with its awesome load carrying capabilities the system is light and simple. It consists of a single aluminum stay attached to a sheet of HDPE, a 1/4 inch foam pad folded in two, and some well placed straps.

The 1/4 inch bivy pad is a great feature, one that in my opinion should be included in every pack in existence. I pull it out all the time during the day to sit or stand on, and also use it as extra insulation when I’m sleeping. I hope to never use it in an unplanned bivy, but it would be better than nothing. It’s also nice to have a bit of potentially sacrificial closed cell foam on hand, considering the number of times I’ve forgotten my insoles on ski trips over the years.

Equipment for backcountry skiing and ski mountaineering

Ski carry loop, tied through the ice axe slot. I'm going to experiment with different locations.

None of the Cilogear packs are purpose designed to carry skis diagonally, but I find it necessary to modify most packs that do have a so-called ski carry system, so the lack of a factory system on the Cilogear is not a big deal to me. While it’s easy for us skiers to criticize Cilogear for not providing this feature, know that one of the goals of Cilogear design is versatility, and a decent diagonal ski carrying rig can be cobbled from the straps that come with the pack when you buy it. I’d suggest we not obsess on the lack of this feature. After all, if you’re a backcountry person you should have at least a modicum of skill with knots, straps and thinking through things like attaching a ski to a backpack. Otherwise, you should be at a ski resort where you can hire a ski concierge!

To rig my version of diagonal carry on the Cilogear Worksack 45, I tie an old piece of 6 mil cord near the base of rucksack, and simply loop a ski strap through one of the top Dee-clips. Rigged like that, the 45 carries skis as well as any other pack I’ve tried. I was a little worried about the durability of where I attached the cord, but it’s holding up. When I’m carrying boots as well, I use a A-frame system for the skis with boots clipped in. This works well with the compression straps on the side of the pack.

Beyond having to spend 5 minutes and tie a ski loop onto the pack, there isn’t really much to complain about with the 45 liter WorkSack. I do think it would be great if they offered a few more options for hipbelts. The belt that comes with the pack is wide and stiff, great for carrying loads, but a bit overkill for lighter days. I like a minimal hipbelt most of the time, as it is lighter and works better with a harness. The hipbelts on Cilogear packs are removable, so you can go with out them to reduce weight. It isn’t really practical to not have a hipbelt while skiing, but it would be great if Cilogear made a few other options for waistbelts that could be attached to their packs. I’d love to have some pockets on the hipbelt as well.

Another feature of the Worksack 45 (and most other Cilogear rucksacks) that works super is the ice axe carry system. This doesn’t use the classic “loop” system that packs have been using for generations. Instead, it comprises two fabric sleeves that hold the pick of the axe, and then a buckle and a piece of shock cord that hold the shaft. One terrific aspect of this system is it allows you slide out the ice axe easily, as opposed to the traditional “loop” system, which requires you to flip the axe 180 degrees. This really shines when you have to access your axe on steep slopes. I’ve carried technical ice tools, normal ice axes, and whippets on the system, and it holds them all securely.

In all, if you want to save weight and have a backpack with super versatility, consider Cilogear.

Cilogear 45 Liter Worksack stats: Pack Bag: 790g / 27 oz. Hipbelt: 120g / 5 oz. Lid: 170g / 6 oz. Full Strap Kit: 160g / 6oz Framesheet + Pad: 550g / 19 oz. Max Weight 1.8kg / 3.9lbs.

Direct link to CiloGear description of their 45 Liter rucksack.



16 Responses to “Cilogear 45 liter WorkSack Review”

  1. Mike August 16th, 2011 11:48 am

    I would be curious to hear comparisons between this pack and the Crux ak47-x. The Crux seems to be a more traditional design, simpler, and lighter.

  2. Louie August 16th, 2011 1:10 pm

    Never heard of Crux before, looks like they have some nice well thought out gear. I wonder if their stuff is available in the states.

  3. Jonathan August 16th, 2011 3:01 pm

    Thanks, very helpful to see a skier’s perspective on their packs. (I know they have a fanatical following among climbers.)
    So I’m looking right now at the website picture for the next larger size, the 60L.
    Seems like the base of the pack has that same split at the bottom where an accessory cord loop could be attached. And by ski strip, did you mean a Voile strap or similar through the D clip?

  4. Louie August 16th, 2011 3:49 pm

    All the packs except the 20 liter have the ice axe sleeves that you can loop cord through. I just use a viole strap for the top. It fits perfectly into the dee-clips.

  5. harpo August 16th, 2011 4:53 pm

    I use a long voile strap through a d-clip for the bottom of the diagonal skin carry as well.

    The shovel pocket holds blade, shovel handle, and probe and is good if you need extra room in the pack or quick access to your avi gear.

    When I visited the Cilo factory a month ago, they were talking about getting avalungs from Bd that they could attach to their packs as an option. I wonder if their system will be better than the zip ties and nylon webbing I use?

  6. hippycrit August 16th, 2011 5:05 pm

    Great review Kouie but I Iike MEC’s Alpinelite’s, just as light and waay cheaper.

  7. Jonathan Shefftz August 16th, 2011 7:09 pm

    Thanks for the clarification on the ski attachment.
    Although for an Avalung, anything has to be better than relying in part on zip ties for something like that!

  8. Ed August 16th, 2011 7:41 pm

    Saw Crux in our traipsing around Ireland and Scotland this summer.
    They were well spoken of.
    Their packs area available from the folks at Telemark-Pyrennes:
    I’ve ordered equipment from TP before to Canada and it’s always arrived safe ‘n sound (but of course the Canadian Gov’t duty elves usually get into the act too).
    Bad elves . . .

  9. Louie August 16th, 2011 9:32 pm

    Avalung would be cool, but how about an airbag? Now that would be awesome.

  10. Harpo August 17th, 2011 9:51 am

    I use several pieces of nylon webbing w/fastex buckles in addition to the zip ties.

  11. Kai August 19th, 2011 1:09 pm

    I am using two bags (22, 43) with similar kind of ice axe attachment, but next time I would choose something else. The biggest problem are the shock cods, they simply don’t survive long enough. The cord is pressed on almost everytime the same place, the plastic piece isn’t also less resistant to wear… Another thing are the buckles – when you don’t check to be sure that snow haven’t gotten in (transition) you could (again) loose your axe.
    That’s just my personal experience. Maybe the cords were too thin, maybe manufacturing fault. I am at least replacing the cords with velcro and thinking about the old style loop holder.

  12. Kai August 19th, 2011 1:15 pm

    add buckles: They are half the size on my bag and placed at an 45degree angle few centimeters away from the pocket-holders. So that could be the problem. πŸ™‚

  13. Jeremy September 1st, 2011 9:11 pm

    Good write up. All my Cilogear packs have treated me quite well – Version 1 60L, newer 60L, 40L, 20L, Schoolbag. The 40 or 45 is about perfect for most trips and a great replacement for my aging Golite Gust, fixing pretty much all the things I didn’t like about the Golite, without much weight penalty.

  14. Charles September 2nd, 2011 5:34 pm

    I am a big fan of CiloGear. My 30L is a great pack, and I am going to buy a 60L shortly.

    One thing to think about when looking at the MEC or Crux products is the country of origin. The MEC is made in Vietnam and the Crux is made in China or Hong Kong. Crux has a good explanation of the complexities related to the “country of origin” of their packs on their website.

    I have never heard of Crux before this review, so I cannot speak to their quality. However, I have seen the MEC product. In short, there is not comparison between it and CiloGear. Cilo makes a much better pack. Also, ever try talking to the owner of MEC? Do you have any idea who sewed your MEC pack? I have spoke with the owner of Cilo and the person who sewed my pack on the phone. I am not going to attempt to explain or justify the whole “buy local” or “buy independent” argument here, but to me there is a lot of value in doing business with a small company where the owner and employees responsible for the production are directly accessible.

  15. Jim September 28th, 2013 2:20 am

    I have many Cilogear packs and think they are great. However, with a camping load and skis and boots, it becomes almost to much for me to carry, and way too much for my wife to carry. I was wondering if there is a system that the skis can attach to a wheel with the boots and clip the tails to the belt and create kind of a “ski barrow” that carry some gear and the boots with the skis rolling on a roller kind of like the Pack Wheel. It would take weight off the shoulders and allow long approaches with ease. I thought some sort of system that utilizes the dynafit tech bindings to hold the wheel or axle in place might work. Anyone try this?

  16. Chip November 16th, 2013 9:33 pm

    @Charles MEC is actually a co-op, so basically everybody that has a membership is an owner. That said Cilogear is great and certainly the small business model allows much more direct input and feedback from customers.

  Your Comments

  Recent Posts

Facebook Twitter Email Instagram Youtube


  • Blogroll & Links

  • Welcome to Louis (Lou) Dawson's backcountry skiing information & opinion website. Lou's passion for the past 50 years has been alpinism, climbing, mountaineering and skiing -- along with all manner of outdoor recreation. He has authored numerous books and articles about ski touring and is well known as the first person to ski down all 54 of Colorado's 14,000-foot peaks, otherwise known as the Fourteeners! Books and free ski touring news and information here.

    All material on this website is copyrighted, the name WildSnow is trademarked, permission required for reproduction (electronic or otherwise) and display on other websites. PLEASE SEE OUR COPYRIGHT and TRADEMARK INFORMATION.

    We include "affiliate sales" links with most of our blog posts. This means we receive a percentage of a sale if you click over from our site (at no cost to you). None of our affiliate commission links are direct relationships with specific gear companies or shopping carts, instead we remain removed by using a third party who manages all our affiliate sales and relationships. We also sell display "banner" advertising, in this case our relationships are closer to the companies who advertise, but our display advertising income is carefully separated financially and editorially from our blog content, over which we always maintain 100% editorial control -- we make this clear during every advertising deal we work out. Please also notice we do the occasional "sponsored" post, these are under similar financial arrangements as our banner advertising, only the banner or other type of reference to a company are included in the blog post, simply to show they provided financial support to and provide them with advertising in return. Unlike most other "sponsored content" you find on the internet, our sponsored posts are entirely under our editorial control and created by WildSnow specific writers.See our full disclosures here.

    Backcountry skiing is dangerous. You may be killed or severely injured if you do any form of ski mountaineering, skimo randonnee and randonnée skiing. The information and news on this website is intended only as general information. Due to human error and passing time, the information, text and images contained within this website may be inaccurate, false, or out-of-date. By using, reading or viewing the information provided on this website, you agree to absolve the owners of Wild Snow as well as content contributors of any liability for injuries or losses incurred while using such information. Furthermore, you agree to use any of this website's information, maps, photos, or binding mounting instructions templates at your own risk, and waive Wild Snow owners and contributors of liability for use of said items for ski touring or any other use.

    Switch To Mobile Version