Ramer Model Universal – Vintage Backcountry Skiing Binding

Post by WildSnow.com blogger Lou Dawson | July 30, 2006

Whew, after this I’ve got one more Ramer binding for the museum then I can start on some other brands. Ramer Universal, in my view the best binding Ramer offered during his run in the business. Universal is basically a refinement of the original Model R. For better release characteristics it uses steel spring bars, and eventually incorporated Ramer’s wonderfully effective push-button length adjustment (though this pair on display has had the length adjustment mechanism modified by permanently fixing it with small nuts and bolts). This binding was the lightest available at the time, and is still a player in the weight arena (it’s only 4 ounces heavier than the Silvretta Pure). While the Model R still had somewhat iffy safety release at certain angles, it was quite effective as a touring binding when maintained correctly, and yielded many a fine adventure for late 1970s and early 1980s backcountry skiers all over the world. Check out the museum display.

Ramer Universal was possibly Ramer’s height of achievement. Basic but effective.The rotating heel unit was tricky but you got used to it. Click image to enlarge

Posted by Lou Dawson on July 30, 2006 | Filed Under Binding Reviews
Tags: backcountry skiing, Binding Reviews, Ramer, safety, ski touring,

Comments

7 Responses to “Ramer Model Universal – Vintage Backcountry Skiing Binding”

Jim Dickinson October 23rd, 2006 4:58 pm

I still ski on Ramer Universals! I have always liked them but maybe it’s time to get some new ones.
Lou October 23rd, 2006 5:30 pm

Thanks for the comment Jim! Hey, if they work for you then they work, but yeah, newer bindings might be better…
Thorsteinn Broddason November 10th, 2006 7:19 am

I still have these bindings on old KÃ¤stle Tour randonee skies, and use them occationally. the plan was to retire them this winter, but the only reason for that is the lack of performance in the skies.
Carl January 1st, 2007 11:16 am

I started with those back in the late 1970’s. I skied several peaks in the Tetons with those mounted on HEXCEL COMPS. I used Scott Boots since they were so light.

What we have available today is absolutely amazing.
I really like the “Museum” here!
Martin Neumann March 5th, 2009 2:14 am

Since I had this model I did not change. Very robust even on a trip to Russia I had no problems whith this binding. Once you loose a part Its quite simple to repair and you don’t have to be an engineer. In Austria you get them nowadays on ebay and most of the people use them for their kids to take them on the mountains. Its cheap and fits to all sizes of boots.
Ken C. December 2nd, 2012 11:00 pm

I still ski on a ‘vintage’ setup of Tua skis, Ramer bindings, and the ‘original’ (red) Dynafit Tourlite boots. One of these boots sustained some damage during a ski tour last spring. I am now perusing the web for a new pair of AT boots. I am concerned new boots may not be compatible with my Ramer Classic bindings. Does anyone know if the Ramers would fit the new AT boots that claim to work with “ISO Touring” bindings?

Another option would be to obtain another pair of the old Dynafit Tourlite boots in ‘serviceable’ condition. If anyone reading this has a pair of these boots (U.S. size 10-1/2) collecting dust in your garage, I would be willing to pay a fair price for them.
Lou Dawson December 3rd, 2012 11:25 am

Ken, nearly any ski boot on the market today will work in the Ramer, only thing is sometimes the ski/walk mechanism can cause the heel latch on the Ramer to not close as far as you might like. I wouldn’t worry too much about it. Pick some boots, get them in hand, and try them out. Lou

Got something to say? Please do so.

Name (required)

Email Address (will not be published) (required)

Website (not required)

Speak your mind

Anti-Spam Quiz: What do touring skiers use to carry their gear on their back? (Answer in English please.)

You can subscribe to comment notification by checking the box to left, but you must leave a brief comment to do so, which records your email and requires you to use our anti-spam challange. If you don't like leaving substantive comments that's fine, just leave a simple comment that says something like "thanks, subscribed" with a made-up name. Check the comment subscription checkbox BEFORE you submit.

If you need an emoticon for a comment just copy/paste off the following list, or use text code you might be familiar with.

:D :-) :( :lol: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :twisted: :roll: :wink: :!: :?: :idea: :arrow:

Due to comment spam we moderate most comments. Please do not submit your comment twice -- it will appear shortly after approval. Comments with one or more links in the text may be held in moderation, for spam prevention. If you'd like to publish a photo in a comment, contact us. Guidelines: Be civil, no personal attacks, avoid vulgarity and profanity.