– The Backcountry Ski Touring Blog
  • Avalanches
  • Gear Reviews
    • Ski Reviews
    • Boot Reviews
    • Binding Reviews
    • Snowboard Splitboard
    • Book Reviews
    • Avalanche Beacon Reviews
    • Airbag Backpacks
    • Backcountry Electronics
    • Misc Gear Reviews
  • Podcast
  • Tips & Tricks
    • Ski Touring Basics
    • Boot Fitting
    • Fitness & Health
    • Gear Mods
  • Trip Reports
    • Fourteeners
    • Huts – Cabins – Lodges
    • Denali McKinley
    • 8,000 Meter Skiing
  • Stories
    • History
    • Humor
    • Land Use Issues
    • Evergreen Ski Touring
    • Poetry
  • Resources
    • All Posts Listed
    • 100 Recent Comments
    • Backcountry Skiing & Ski Touring Webcams
    • Ski Weights Comparison
    • Archives of WildSnow.com
    • Authors Page
    • Ski Touring Bindings
      • Trab TR2 Index and FAQ
      • Salomon Guardian & Tracker
      • Naxo Backcountry Skiing Bindings – Info Index
      • Silvretta Pure Backcountry Skiing Bindings – Info Index
      • Marker F10-12 Duke Baron
      • G3 Onyx Ski Binding FAQ
      • G3 ION Ski Touring Binding
      • Fritschi Backcountry Skiing Bindings – Info Index
      • Fritschi Diamir Frame Bindings Mount DIY
      • Fritschi Diamir Bindings FAQ
      • Fritschi Tecton FAQ
      • Atomic Salomon Backland MTN
      • Dynafit Tri-Step Binding 2001-2003
      • Naxo randonnee alpine touring AT ski binding FAQ
      • Dynafit Skiing Bindings – Info Index
      • Dynafit Binding Frequently Asked Questions FAQ
      • Dynafit Beast 16 FAQ Review 1
      • Dynafit Beast 16 FAQ Page Two
    • History
      • Ski Touring Binding Museum
      • Trooper Traverse Intro & Index
      • Randonnee Ski Touring “AT” ski gear — What is Hip?
      • Chronology
    • Backcountry Skiing Core Glossary
    • Gear Review Policy & Disclosures

– The Backcountry Ski Touring Blog

Banner
  • Avalanches
  • Gear Reviews
    • Ski Reviews
    • Boot Reviews
    • Binding Reviews
    • Snowboard Splitboard
    • Book Reviews
    • Avalanche Beacon Reviews
    • Airbag Backpacks
    • Backcountry Electronics
    • Misc Gear Reviews
  • Podcast
  • Tips & Tricks
    • Ski Touring Basics
    • Boot Fitting
    • Fitness & Health
    • Gear Mods
  • Trip Reports
    • Fourteeners
    • Huts – Cabins – Lodges
    • Denali McKinley
    • 8,000 Meter Skiing
  • Stories
    • History
    • Humor
    • Land Use Issues
    • Evergreen Ski Touring
    • Poetry
  • Resources
    • All Posts Listed
    • 100 Recent Comments
    • Backcountry Skiing & Ski Touring Webcams
    • Ski Weights Comparison
    • Archives of WildSnow.com
    • Authors Page
    • Ski Touring Bindings
      • Trab TR2 Index and FAQ
      • Salomon Guardian & Tracker
      • Naxo Backcountry Skiing Bindings – Info Index
      • Silvretta Pure Backcountry Skiing Bindings – Info Index
      • Marker F10-12 Duke Baron
      • G3 Onyx Ski Binding FAQ
      • G3 ION Ski Touring Binding
      • Fritschi Backcountry Skiing Bindings – Info Index
      • Fritschi Diamir Frame Bindings Mount DIY
      • Fritschi Diamir Bindings FAQ
      • Fritschi Tecton FAQ
      • Atomic Salomon Backland MTN
      • Dynafit Tri-Step Binding 2001-2003
      • Naxo randonnee alpine touring AT ski binding FAQ
      • Dynafit Skiing Bindings – Info Index
      • Dynafit Binding Frequently Asked Questions FAQ
      • Dynafit Beast 16 FAQ Review 1
      • Dynafit Beast 16 FAQ Page Two
    • History
      • Ski Touring Binding Museum
      • Trooper Traverse Intro & Index
      • Randonnee Ski Touring “AT” ski gear — What is Hip?
      • Chronology
    • Backcountry Skiing Core Glossary
    • Gear Review Policy & Disclosures
   

G3 Seekr Swift 100 — Ski Review

by Lou Dawson October 8, 2020
written by Lou Dawson October 8, 2020
G3 Seekr Swift 100 ski

G3 Seekr Swift 100 ski

Can a ski be too easy to turn? I’ve been asking myself that question of late, as I continue my quest for the plank that compensates for my lack of ankle flexibility (left, fused). In a previous blog post, I related how I’d experienced a ski that for me was too hard to turn.

I’ve now gone to the other extreme. And I like it.

A few years back, G3 introduced their Elle ski line, for women. I’ve never been entirely comfortable with the gender designation of outdoors gear. With the exception of a few feminine specific products relating to realities of anatomy, body types in the real world vary so much as to moot anything specific. Humans, whatever gender, come in heavy, light, short, tall, skinny and bulky versions. To name a few.

Sure, any boot fitter will tell you that women’s calf muscles “tend” to require more room at the boot liner cuff, and I’d agree from experience that sometimes female feet involve narrow ankles. But do they all? No. Likewise, a backpack maker might design a waistbelt with a taper for the wider pelvic bone structure of female anatomy, but doesn’t an adjustable waist belt with adequate padding accomplish the same thing? I’m told by Lisa that it does. If you think me wrong, please comment.

Moreover, consider the male side of the equation. If we’re going to have women’s skis, how about a line specific for men because we’re “bigger and stronger”? Yeah, wrong on so many levels.

So how about this? Instead of designating gear with a gender prefix, sell it for body type, style, and recreation goals?

For example, sell a backpack in a few versions for different torso lengths, with a proven unisex waist belt. Or in the case of ski boots, design the liner so it molds adequately for any leg size. Or, in the case of skis, just give us options, ever more options.

Well, G3 has done just that. They scrapped their Elle women’s line and morphed it into what they’re calling the “Swift” version of their ski physics.

In G3’s marketing words, Swift is “not a ‘female series,’ a ‘youth series,’ or a ‘beginner series.’ It’s for smaller adults and youth…”

Funny they use the word “smaller” instead of “lighter weight,” perhaps a bit of PCnoia? I’ll let that one go, and add my own spreech. This is the perfect ski series for older, physically compromised, skinnier skiers. In other words, beat up, lean veterans like me.

Hence, last winter I acquired a pair of G3 Seekr Swift 100 testers, and wrung them out. And yes dear reader, they’re too easy to turn. The G3 Swift series has thus become my daily driver, and is something you might consider as well. Here’s why.

Weight: My 170 cm testers came in at 1,375 grams per ski (average of pair). While that’s not exceptional, it’s light. That’s a score of 73 on our weight/surface chart, right there with with the other lower-mass skis. Would I prefer them to be somewhat lighter? Probably. But I think G3 nails it here with their blending of durability, skiability and mass. In this case, that would be a full thickness base, PU sidewalls, beefy tip-wrapped edges and of course a ski that actually skis.

Geometry: Most importantly, a key element of the Swift series is it provides a 154 cm option, one step below the 162 cm shortest of G3’s regular ski lines. I’m using the 170, but those of you in the “smaller” category, do note that here is a fully formed performance plank you can get in the appropriate length for your body type.

As for shape, the Seekr Swift 100 boasts a 16.4 meter radius, with 31 millimeters sidecut. I wouldn’t call this radius “relaxed,” but neither did I find it to be too squirrely. Simply put, it’s a good compromise between stability and turnability.

G3 apparently doesn’t like the word “rocker,” they instead call it “early rise.” Whatever, these boards have plenty of it. With my 170s held base-to-base, the tip rocker extends 45 centimetres to a flat spot. Soon after that, under the foot, there’s a small amount of classic camber, then the tail rocker begins about 25 centimetres from the binding heel.

Overall, this is a complex geometry that could be over-thought. But in this case, it works. You can feel the camber pop you from turn to turn, and the rocker does it’s usual job of providing tilt-and-turn ease when the snow gets difficult.

Length: I’m using an admittedly short 170 cm length ski for my ~180 cm height. What with all its rocker, the Seekr Swift skis short for me — it’s no speed freak. But with controlled velocity, a shorter plank is just plain easier, quick to hop around, a snap to butter or slarve. And they fit sideways in my truck without scratching the door panels. Sure, as a professional skier I’m blessed with an extensive quiver, and some of my skis are long, but as the years pile on I trend to the shorter options. In the backcountry, anyway.

Construction: What with multiple carbon fiber layers, wood core and PU sidewalls, G3 does not compromise.

Flex: This is where the sweetness resides. While the shape of the Swift series skis is virtually the same as their namesake’s lengths in G3’s regular line, they bend easier. Gone are the days of standing my skinny carcass on a pair of steel-stiff planks and waiting for something to happen. In this case, I can honestly say the flex is perfect — and something does happen.

More: You get G3’s cool embedded magnets — they hold the skis base-to-base for casual carries. A Titanal binding mount plate inspires confidence and saves shop employees from playing strip-the-screw.

Field testing: I skied the Seekr Swift 100 on everything from icy morning frozen to blower pow. They were scary on the ice — to be expected — while playful and yes, easy in the pow. I hit my nemesis a few times as well: classic Colorado trap crust. In that best avoided event, I found the rocker and poppy camber helped me shift from turn-to-turn, but I would have enjoyed a more relaxed radius and more length. In general, the reasonable weight on the up and easy turns on the down made this a plank I highly recommend, given your body type and physical condition require an “easier” platform.

Conclusion: The Seekr Swift 100 is not the lightest touring ski out there. But its mass is reasonable and it checks every other criteria on the list. It’s too easy to turn, and that’s what I want.

Numbers:
Length 170 cm (available as 154, 162, 170, 178)
Sidecut as measured 131/100/119
Verified weight per ski, average for pair: 1,375 grams

Shop for G3 Skis

6 comments
1
FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
previous post
Treading Lightly Through Close-to-Home Mountains
next post
The Masses Speak — Why to Hire a Guide This Winter

6 comments

Jim Milstein October 8, 2020 - 6:14 pm

Ah, the second childhood, but this time with much better gear!

I need help, Lou. For a number of decades I was not paying attention to ski lingo, and now I don’t know much of the jargon known to everyone else. Is there a glossary somewhere I can look up “butter” and “slarve” and other mysterious words and phrases? My approach to skiing has been just to ski. I expect to be much happier when I can put names to my mistakes and triumphs.

Dva October 12, 2020 - 3:04 am

I can help you out with those

“Smear” indicates a type of turn where you gently wash out and release your ski tails across the fall line while maintaining a neutral stance (so not a generic hockey stop while it is similar). Typically easier to do on progressive mounted (bindings closer to the ski geometric true center) softer skis with tip and tail rocker/early rise. It also typically involves spraying copious amounts of snow.

“Butter” stands for nose butter 360s generally. That is a freestyle maneuver where you rotate into a 180, press on your ski tips so that you find yourself with all your weight on them until you eventually revert (butter) back around with an additional rotation. I don’t really see Lou getting nose butters on a 170 long 1300 g ski but hey this is 2020 you never know. Maybe he meant something different but this is what butters and buttering are generally known for.

Dva October 12, 2020 - 3:05 am

“Smear” and “slarve” represent the same concept, sorry for misquoting the actual term used by Lou

Stephen October 10, 2020 - 3:59 am

Outstanding post – thanks Lou! ;^)

“Instead of designating gear with a gender prefix, sell it for body type, style, and recreation goals?”

^ Absolutely spot on.

And, if you’re prepared to tell us, what do you weigh? As a lifelong ectomorph I’ve always struggled with ski length recommendations based on height, given my expected weight at 180cm tall is probably ~10-15kg more.

Lou Dawson 2 October 12, 2020 - 7:33 am

DVA, you are right, I’m not exactly doing intentional butters, only accidental (ha ha), but after having watched friends I’m am well aware of the concept and a ski like this, while it’s not designed for “tricks” does make them more possible. Slarving, however, just seems to happen naturally with rockered, soft skis. Jim, playing around with slarving, given the right ski, is a nice addition to one’s repertoire. I find it useful when I’m feeling relaxed, maybe a little tired, and need to brush off speed without executing turns. To an old schooler like me it feels like cheating. But hey, it’s not illegal.

Lou Dawson 2 October 12, 2020 - 7:39 am

Stephen, I’m about 70 kilos, 180 cm tall. My favored ski length is often about 180 cm, but as I alluded to in the post, I do use lengths around 170 as well. It is indeed important to pick ski length based on body weight. It’s not so much a matter of “sinking” in soft snow, as it is about how the ski flexes and rides. Though in terms of ideals for human powered skiing, a longer ski can help with trail breaking in bottomless conditions like we get here in Colorado.

Comments are closed.

Recent Comments

  • Clanicius on Spring Touring Essentials for Day Trips, Overnights, and Ski Mountaineering
  • DavidH on Exploring the Gem of Washington Pass
  • Gary on Exploring the Gem of Washington Pass
  • Jim Pace on Exploring the Gem of Washington Pass
  • Lou Dawson 2 on Breaking Down the New BD Pieps Beacon Recall

Gear Reviews

  • Atomic Hawx Ultra XTD 115 W Touring Boot Review

    April 7, 2021
  • BCA Scepter Ski Pole Review — Updated and Improved

    April 6, 2021
  • Spring Touring Essentials for Day Trips, Overnights, and Ski Mountaineering

    March 29, 2021

Trip Reports

  • Team WildSnow Recaps 2021 Grand Traverse Ski Race

    April 5, 2021
  • The Gothic Mountain Tour: Not Just a Training Race

    March 3, 2021
  • Making Turns and Skintracks at Bluebird Backcountry

    February 24, 2021

Totally Deep Podcast

  • Totally Deep Podcast 86 — Ross Herr of Dynafit

    March 9, 2021
  • Totally Deep Podcast 85 — Serious Powder Talk with Doug & Randy

    February 25, 2021
  • Drinking Beer with the Bench Girls — Totally Deep Podcast 84

    February 12, 2021

Tips & Tricks

  • Spring Avalanche Drama (and How to Avoid It!)

    April 2, 2021
  • Spring Touring Essentials for Day Trips, Overnights, and Ski Mountaineering

    March 29, 2021
  • Pocket Vs. Harness — Where Should You Wear Your Beacon?

    March 18, 2021

Ski Touring Stories

  • Envisioning a Friendly, Busier Backcountry — Shaun Deutschlander Q&A

    January 18, 2021
  • Giving Myself the Gift of Backcountry

    January 15, 2021
  • Six Who Dared — Elk Mountains Traverse & Richard Compton Tribute

    January 7, 2021

Newsletter Sign-Up

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • About Lou Dawson
  • Authors Page
  • About
  • Contact
  • Copyright & Legal
  • Website Security

@2020 - All Rights Reserved. Designed and Developed by WildSnow


Back To Top

Read alsox

Exploring the Gem of Washington Pass

April 15, 2021

Ski Crampons — When To, When...

April 13, 2021

Bring Out the Black Belt —...

April 12, 2021