– The Backcountry Ski Touring Blog
  • Avalanches
  • Gear Reviews
    • Ski Reviews
    • Boot Reviews
    • Binding Reviews
    • Snowboard Splitboard
    • Book Reviews
    • Avalanche Beacon Reviews
    • Airbag Backpacks
    • Backcountry Electronics
    • Misc Gear Reviews
  • Podcast
  • Tips & Tricks
    • Ski Touring Basics
    • Boot Fitting
    • Fitness & Health
    • Gear Mods
  • Trip Reports
    • Fourteeners
    • Huts – Cabins – Lodges
    • Denali McKinley
    • 8,000 Meter Skiing
  • Stories
    • History
    • Humor
    • Land Use Issues
    • Evergreen Ski Touring
    • Poetry
  • Resources
    • All Posts Listed
    • 100 Recent Comments
    • Backcountry Skiing & Ski Touring Webcams
    • Ski Weights Comparison
    • Archives of WildSnow.com
    • Authors Page
    • Ski Touring Bindings
      • Trab TR2 Index and FAQ
      • Salomon Guardian & Tracker
      • Naxo Backcountry Skiing Bindings – Info Index
      • Silvretta Pure Backcountry Skiing Bindings – Info Index
      • Marker F10-12 Duke Baron
      • G3 Onyx Ski Binding FAQ
      • G3 ION Ski Touring Binding
      • Fritschi Backcountry Skiing Bindings – Info Index
      • Fritschi Diamir Frame Bindings Mount DIY
      • Fritschi Diamir Bindings FAQ
      • Fritschi Tecton FAQ
      • Atomic Salomon Backland MTN
      • Dynafit Tri-Step Binding 2001-2003
      • Naxo randonnee alpine touring AT ski binding FAQ
      • Dynafit Skiing Bindings – Info Index
      • Dynafit Binding Frequently Asked Questions FAQ
      • Dynafit Beast 16 FAQ Review 1
      • Dynafit Beast 16 FAQ Page Two
    • History
      • Ski Touring Binding Museum
      • Trooper Traverse Intro & Index
      • Randonnee Ski Touring “AT” ski gear — What is Hip?
      • Chronology
    • Backcountry Skiing Core Glossary
    • Gear Review Policy & Disclosures

– The Backcountry Ski Touring Blog

Banner
  • Avalanches
  • Gear Reviews
    • Ski Reviews
    • Boot Reviews
    • Binding Reviews
    • Snowboard Splitboard
    • Book Reviews
    • Avalanche Beacon Reviews
    • Airbag Backpacks
    • Backcountry Electronics
    • Misc Gear Reviews
  • Podcast
  • Tips & Tricks
    • Ski Touring Basics
    • Boot Fitting
    • Fitness & Health
    • Gear Mods
  • Trip Reports
    • Fourteeners
    • Huts – Cabins – Lodges
    • Denali McKinley
    • 8,000 Meter Skiing
  • Stories
    • History
    • Humor
    • Land Use Issues
    • Evergreen Ski Touring
    • Poetry
  • Resources
    • All Posts Listed
    • 100 Recent Comments
    • Backcountry Skiing & Ski Touring Webcams
    • Ski Weights Comparison
    • Archives of WildSnow.com
    • Authors Page
    • Ski Touring Bindings
      • Trab TR2 Index and FAQ
      • Salomon Guardian & Tracker
      • Naxo Backcountry Skiing Bindings – Info Index
      • Silvretta Pure Backcountry Skiing Bindings – Info Index
      • Marker F10-12 Duke Baron
      • G3 Onyx Ski Binding FAQ
      • G3 ION Ski Touring Binding
      • Fritschi Backcountry Skiing Bindings – Info Index
      • Fritschi Diamir Frame Bindings Mount DIY
      • Fritschi Diamir Bindings FAQ
      • Fritschi Tecton FAQ
      • Atomic Salomon Backland MTN
      • Dynafit Tri-Step Binding 2001-2003
      • Naxo randonnee alpine touring AT ski binding FAQ
      • Dynafit Skiing Bindings – Info Index
      • Dynafit Binding Frequently Asked Questions FAQ
      • Dynafit Beast 16 FAQ Review 1
      • Dynafit Beast 16 FAQ Page Two
    • History
      • Ski Touring Binding Museum
      • Trooper Traverse Intro & Index
      • Randonnee Ski Touring “AT” ski gear — What is Hip?
      • Chronology
    • Backcountry Skiing Core Glossary
    • Gear Review Policy & Disclosures
   

Quarantine Q&A Part II — Cody Townsend on Gear

by Gary Smith April 22, 2020
written by Gary Smith April 22, 2020

Cody Townsend and Jimmy Chin climbing the Grand Teton, Wyoming last season. Photo: Bjarne Salen @bjarnesalen

On Gear: Past , Present and Future

I caught up with Cody Townsend and chat about this season, skiing during the confusing corona times, and the future of “The Fifty Project”, published yesterday. We went on to ramble about gear as skiers do. Here are some loose-interview format takeaways for gear he’s on and what the Solomon team is working on.


GS: What was your first touring setup? Do you remember that dinosaur?

Patagonia snow

SPONSORED BY: PATAGONIA

CT: Yes, I do. This hearkens back to my first time I skied Bloody Couloir. I was in Salomon plug boots. I had Alpine Trekkers, aka day wreckers. The 198 Salomon AK Rocket swallowtail skis, mounted with full-steel Salomon 916 bindings.

GS: Oh, that’s amazing. That’s like, 20 pounds of setup.

CT: At least. Now I look back and I’m like, “Yes, of course you hated touring back then.” It was the most exhausting, uncomfortable thing you could ever do. I literally despised touring for, maybe 10 years, until Salomon started making the stuff that you could tour in and not be uncomfortable, and not exhaust yourself at 100 vertical feet.

Spearhead traverse cody townsend1

Townsend out of his element, in spandex, traversing on Killian Jornet’s powder skis. Photo: Bjarne Salen @bjarnesalen

GS: I watched the 50 Project boot mod episode recently. Are you taking over Killian Jornet’s place on the lightweight front for Salomon?

CT: No, God no. I skied on his X-ALP skis last year for the traverse episode. They are his fat skis and they were terrifying to me. I don’t know how he does it. I’m more of a gram counter than I’ve ever been, but there’s still a line. When it comes to some of the bigger expeditions like Saint Elias, yes, I’m going to go as light as works for me, something like MTN 95 skis and X-ALP boots, but the majority are on heavy boots and fat skis.

GS: There’s a place for classically trained skiers like yourself to get involved in the light gear development. What trends should we be looking forward to in that step up from race, mid-weight touring realm? Do you think that people like you are going to influence it?

CT: That’s where I and some of our team like Greg Hill and Chris Rubens are focused right now — the 1,000-1,500 gram boots that walk like a lightweight boot. I’ve tested pretty much every major boot in that class, and think there’s a lot of room for improvement across the board. The biggest innovation so far was Hoji’s walk mechanism that pushed everyone forward in that class. It’s interesting though because the boot that everyone loved in the ‘step up from race class’, the Alien RS, just got cancelled. So, the demand for it is low, which kind of sucks. I think that’s where the innovation is going to continue to happen, not necessarily in the 600 gram boots but in the 1,000-1,500 gram boot.

GS: I’m looking forward to that. I’ve skied lighter gear for a while, and feel like I prefer it now. I pulled out the Tecnica Zero G four buckle the other day for a tour, and felt like I couldn’t feel my ski or get into the sweet spot. Have your tastes evolved since you’ve been skiing light gear in bad snow?

CT: Yes, totally. Last year I was skiing on the X-ALP a bit, and then I went back to my MTN Lab and I was like, “God, these are so clunky-feeling.” For the first time in my life I’m factoring weight and efficiency into gear choices. My tastes have changed, but I also would say that this year I reverted a little bit. I went back to a heavier setup, and I’ve kind of enjoyed it more. I did more training, and so I’m stronger and able to pull it up a little bit easier.

Cody Townsend climbing North Maroon Peak

Townsend climbing North Maroon peak in the WildSnow backyard. Mtn 95s, MTN bindings, and X-ALP boots were the choice that day. Photo: Bjarne Salen @bjarnesalen

GS: I noticed that you’re rocking the 118s and the bigger boot more this year.

CT: Pretty much all year. But, I’m also working with Salomon on the ski front. There’s a lot of potential innovation in that realm too. A lot of lightweight skis are just tinny, and they don’t ski that well, but I feel that with the right materials and shapes, we can get to a place where you have power and dampness out of a ski that’s in the 1,000, maybe 1,500 gram realm. Right now we’re seeing the performance around 2,000, and that’s really heavy for big days.

GS: What are some other things the development team is working on?

CT: Have you ever done a side-by-side comparison between a binding with toe unit elasticity and a binding without on the same ski? It is a massive how much worse ski skis with a binding with no toe elasticity. Really we kind of geek out, everyone’s like, power transfer and all that. Power transfer is nothing. It’s all about elasticity.

We did a test with the STH 2 alpine binding where we locked out one toe, and ran one with elasticity. One ski it would be carving on a groomer, and make the next turn, and you’d be chattering out. We realized, toe elasticity isn’t just for safety, it actually makes the ski perform better. It makes your turn better, it makes everything better. So, it’s kind of counter-intuitive, and it’s fun to learn through these processes of how your equipment interacts with your ski turn.

GS: That’s interesting, as we’re all running around on 80-gram toe pieces that actually ski worse, even though they’re more rigid and transfer more power.

CT: Yes. But we have learned about the interaction between the ski and the tech binding too. We will put the same binding on 5 different pairs of skis, and then vice versa, a bunch of different bindings on the same pair of skis, and you can see how the interaction between elasticity and torsional rigidity will influence the way the ski turns. So, in a ski that’s super lightweight and kind of floppy, that’s when having a little less elasticity can actually make it perform a little bit better. To me it’s a lot like surfing, the volume and the rail design and everything is interactive with each other, and if you have one of those things off. If you have hard rails on a board that is very high-performance, it just doesn’t work. The same goes with skiing, your binding interface and your boot interface has to match your ski, and vice versa. When I see a tech binding on a pair of on mountain skis on the resort I think, “Dude, what are you doing? You’re going to feel like shit all day and potentially Tib-Fib yourself.”

GS: I was in that boat for a couple of years on the resort. This season I screwed a Shift to a big ski and remembered what alpine gear was all about.

CT: Yes. You kind of realize, “Okay, that makes sense.” So, yes, I think we’re all trying to work toward the Holy Grail, the lightest setup that is safe and skis well, that we all want to ski.

Subscribe to the Fifty Project webisodes and revisit Cody Townsend Quarantine Q&A Part I here.

16 comments
3
FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
previous post
Quarantine Q&A — Cody Townsend Part I
next post
Dynafit Brings the Beef — Hoji Free Review

16 comments

Scott Allen April 22, 2020 - 11:45 am

Please say a bit more on tech toe binding elasticity, as I am curious if this applies to locking out the toe (lever up) vs. the recommended open position with lever down.

Cody Townsend April 22, 2020 - 1:45 pm

Scott- Elasticity in the toe does not differ between locked tech toes and unlocked tech toes. Well perhaps it does, but you’re talking a range of toe elasticity from 0mm (locked) to 2mm (unlocked), which I guarantee is undecipherable in ski performance. This is for the vast majority of tech bindings, currently the Tecton is the only tech binding with toe elasticity (13mm), where as bindings like the SHIFT (47mm) or a STH2 (52mm) have far more elasticity. Oh and from my testing and work with binding engineers, heel elasticity does very little for safety and performance, so it shouldn’t ever be factored in to the overall ‘elasticity’ metrics.

Kam DH April 22, 2020 - 3:01 pm

I’m not up on all the details, but does the ability of the Dynafit Rotation toes to rotate equate to “toe elasticity”? I do think they ski better on bigger skis with bigger boots than the old Radical bindings did, but am unsure how much of this is due to the heel elasticity or toe.

Gary Smith April 22, 2020 - 7:01 pm

Hey Kam, From my understanding, the rotation was to aid in release. The movement in the piece is not lateral as Cody is referring to in the Alpine binding tests. I think the main difference related to ski performance in old and new Radical/Rotation bindings is the wide base of the heel tower. Original models short of bottlenecked, new ones fan out (by design) for more stability in the heel.

Dabe April 23, 2020 - 12:21 pm

*And Trab TR2 ?

kyle April 23, 2020 - 4:22 pm

Hey Cody, curious why we see the opposite in binding development with the tecton and kingpin. If toe elasticity matters more than heel why are we seeing alpine toes like a shift or duke pt toe with a pin heel?

Dabe April 23, 2020 - 6:43 pm

Because pin heels don’t provide forward pressure required to load an alpine toe

Patrick Chase April 22, 2020 - 1:58 pm

The Fritschi Vipec has the same toe unit as the Tecton, and also has toe elasticity. The main difference between those is the solid boot-heel-to-ski transmission in the Tecton.

If you count the SHIFT and the new Marker with the goofy-looking detachable toe as “tech” then they also have elasticity, obviously

Bruno April 22, 2020 - 3:39 pm

For me, heel elasticity has never been a big concern for how well a ski skis, but certainly influences unintended release, no?

But tech bindings that have a rotating heel versus an alpine style heel makes a big difference. I was amazed when I did an a-b comparison on a ski with G3 Ion vs Tecton. While I would prefer to ascend on the Ion, the Tecton just blows it away on the down.

Good luck on the rest of the 50. Be well.

Patrick Chase April 22, 2020 - 4:00 pm

Tecton also has toe elasticity, which has a significant impact on feel. If you wanted to isolate the impact of the alpine heel you could try the Kingpin (which I personally have no use for – IMO not enough weight savings over the Shift, which clobbers it on the down).

Bruno Schull April 23, 2020 - 4:59 am

The thoughts about binding elasticity and ski design are really interesting. We often read hear about how heavier/burlier/wider bindings belong on heavier/burlier/wider skis, and vice versa. We also hear about the success folks have uusing light bindings on big fat skis. But we don’t hear so much about the interplay of binding elasticity and ski design. If I’m reading this right, Cody has found the best results when there is sufficient elasticity in the system, either from the skis or the bindings. If the skis are really stiff, it feels better with more elasticity in the binding…and if the skis are more forgiving, you can get away with less elasticity in the binding. Intriguing approach.

Steven Zwisler April 23, 2020 - 9:39 am

It seems that the issue of using tech bindings for area skiing provokes strong opinions. Is there any data that suggests there is greater frequency or severity of injuries for tech binding users?

Gary Smith April 23, 2020 - 10:08 am

Great question Steven, we should dig in a bit more. Anecdotally from medics/docs/other friends more qualified than I, have heard that the lower leg injuries are more often soft tissue (torn ligaments) in alpine bindings and bone (tib/fib example) in tech. I’m not sure there is enough data out there to support much of a study.

Bruno April 23, 2020 - 10:42 am

Yes – search Wildsnow for tech binding release values as compiled by Rick Howell.

Curt April 23, 2020 - 2:51 pm

Cody, your journey to the 50 is not complete until you ski one of the 50 on tele gear!

The Woodsman April 23, 2020 - 5:35 pm

Ha! I’ll second that! (double-dog-dare ‘ya) I was stoked to see one of his companions skiing TTN Lynx bindings in the Giant Steps Episode (#11, about 7:40 you can see them clearly, and at 8:20 he’s crankin’ t-turns). Confirmed my choice to purchase a set of Lynxes. I wonder if Salomon would be down with that though..

Comments are closed.

Recent Comments

  • TSO on Giving Myself the Gift of Backcountry
  • Slim on Giving Myself the Gift of Backcountry
  • Kevin S on Giving Myself the Gift of Backcountry
  • Richard Hammond on Versatile and Sustainable — WNDR Vital 100 Ski Review
  • Al on Euro Puro Amoro — La Sportiva Orizion Touring Pant

Gear Reviews

  • Meidjo 3.0 Binding Review – Backcountry Telemark Evolves

    January 12, 2021
  • Tele Tech First Look — Voile Ultra Vector BC, 22 Designs Lynx, Scarpa TX Pro

    January 5, 2021
  • Petzl Irvis Hybrid Crampon Review

    January 4, 2021

Trip Reports

  • Finding Early Turns on Rainier’s Muir Snowfield

    November 14, 2020
  • Treading Lightly Through Close-to-Home Mountains

    October 6, 2020
  • Snoqualmie Classic — Chair Peak Circumnavigation

    May 26, 2020

Totally Deep Podcast

  • Risky Business — Zahan Billimoria on Solving for Z

    December 14, 2020
  • Totally Deep Podcast 81 — CAIC Director Ethan Greene

    December 9, 2020
  • Unraveling the Mysteries of Avalanche Education — Totally Deep Podcast 80

    November 16, 2020

Tips & Tricks

  • 10 Essential Mistakes for the Backcountry Ski Touring Beginner

    December 2, 2020
  • Buying Used Gear Guide Part II — Poles, Avy Gear, Packs

    November 25, 2020
  • Save Your Ski Day — Emergency Car Kit Essentials

    November 24, 2020

Ski Touring Stories

  • Six Who Dared — Elk Mountains Traverse & Richard Compton Tribute

    January 7, 2021
  • Risky Business — Zahan Billimoria on Solving for Z

    December 14, 2020
  • A Lifetime of Skiing the Heights — Natural Progression Book Review

    December 11, 2020

Newsletter Sign-Up

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • About Lou Dawson
  • Authors Page
  • About
  • Contact
  • Copyright & Legal
  • Website Security

@2020 - All Rights Reserved. Designed and Developed by WildSnow


Back To Top

Read alsox

Giving Myself the Gift of Backcountry

January 15, 2021

Euro Puro Amoro — La Sportiva...

January 13, 2021

Griffin Post Stays Home — Totally...

January 10, 2021