(This post sponsored by our publishing partner Cripple Creek Backcountry.)
Ski touring gear archaeologists across the world sifted through dusty parts bins, dug like starving gold prospectors through European industrial dumping grounds, and even excavated through the sifting bone dust of ancient tombs. The search at times appeared endless — ultimately taking nearly half a century.
All quested for the Lost Binding of Z, a fabled amalgam, rumored to have been created by mad engineer Mac Ztrif 50 years ahead of his time. A man who in lieu of modern computerized machining would carve perfect prototype ski binding parts using only a sharp pocket knife and dense knotwood harvested from secret groves in the high Alps of Slovenia.
I thought this was BS, but reliable insider sources tell us G3 had secret agents seeded throughout the world. When a grizzled grave robber excavated what proved to be the Z, the Canadians were as quick on the patent licensing bid as they are on their hockey blades, thus snatching this amazing technology from the hands of their competitors.
Using the Lost Z binding as a point of departure, in little more than 12 months the Vancouver vanguard had a modern version of the ZED 12 ski touring binding they now announce, with plans to retail beginning fall of 2018. What blows my mind is how similar this is to the ION, only I lost count of the subtle improvements. Yeah, it took fifty years, but we have finally reached ZED!
What’s remarkable about the ZED is how close it is in engineering and appearance to the G3 ION. Indeed, the ZED toe unit is exactly a stripped down ION toe with the same excellent geometry and jaw closing force.
Heel unit is quite different, however, it being significantly lighter, but more, integrating both sideways and upwards release value adjustment into one spring and one adjustment. This is not easy, but clearly the way any lighter weight modern tech binding heel should be configured.
The astute consumer of ski touring bindings will no doubt ask “why not just ski an ION?” Several reasons you might go one way or the other on that. Firstly, with ION LT (no brake) you’ll pay a weight penalty of about 114 grams (4 ounces) per foot, which is not insignificant. G3 says the ION might be more suitable for hard charging while ZED is clearly more on the ski touring side of the equation, and thus you get a smidge of durability for the weight price. I’m not entirely convinced that’s a factor for most shoppers, though ION parts such as the toe unit chassis and heel top plate are obviously stronger. A more subtle difference is that ION ingeniously locks out its ski flex compensation while in touring mode, thus preventing possible wear inducing fore/aft movement of the heel unit while in touring mode. Also, as I alluded to elsewhere, due to the virtually zero ramp of the ZED, the heel lifters are probably slightly lower than ION (though we do need to do some measuring on that).
In the end, if ZED proves out, that might simply be proof that ION could be lighter. We shall see. My favorite thing about ION is unlike ZED’s admittedly clever one-screw release value adjustment, you have two independent adjustments and can thus tune release values — something I’ve found quite useful in convincing tech bindings to perform at “chart” release-retention values (and as one commenter mentioned, is useful if you find the brake might be influencing your lateral release resistance). ZED reduces weight and enhances simplicity by combining adjustments into one, but everything comes at a price.
Another thing some of you might care about, ION provides 22 mm boot length adjustment while ZED offers 30. In my view that’s significant. More, you can run ZED with longer demo plate, thus enjoying 62 mm of boot length adjustment for a few grams weight increase per binding. That’s impressive, in fact it’s nothing less than proof that concepts gleaned from the Lost Binding of Z are as timely now as they were when Mac Ztrif whittled that first prototype so long ago.
Conclusion: To say we are excited about this binding is to put it mildly. It appears to be a wonderful contribution, and will no doubt rise to the top choices in the mob of classic tech bindings you’ll be able to choose from beginning fall of 2018. Wildsnow did ski the ZED a few days ago, we’ll report on that in a separate blog post. This is clearly one of the lightest tech binding yet to offer such a robust combination of features, e.g., fully adjustable release to RV 12; flex compensation; wide range boot length adjustment; 3 climbing lift positions including heel flat on ski; optional brake; G3 toe jaw retention features. And, it’s designed and assembled in North America.
Let’s do the numbers:
— “ZED” zero theme continues in the ZED’s ramp angle. Check out our chart. Ramp angle of this binding is virtually zero! That’ll keep some of you happy, while some skiers may want the heel stacked a few millimeters to get the ramp feel they’re used to (me). Bear in mind that binding ramp influences how high the climbing heel lift will feel, in this case we suspect you’re not going to feel stilted to the stratosphere when invoking the high lift, measurement on that is coming.
— Verified weights, retail version:
—- Toe 128 grams (4.5 oz) no crampon mount, with screws.
—- Heel 246 grams (8.7 oz) with screws.
—- Brake, 115 mm, 86 grams (3.0 oz)
— Available brakes: 85,100,115,130 mm.
— Release values (RV) 5-12.
— Ski flex compensation 10 mm (known as “forward pressure” to those who don’t understand).
— Boot length adjustment range 30 mm, 62 with demo plate at only 25 grams weight increase per binding (pre production weight).
— Mounting screw pattern same as ION, wide, heel 36.5 mm, toe 40 mm.
ZED trivia: We couldn’t help but ponder the symbolism of ZED. Obviously, the word signifies Canada, where it’s a matter of national pride to utter “zed” instead of “zee” in speech. But consider that Z can mean zero, and this coming season G3 will be for the first time in their history make zero telemark bindings — no doubt due in part to the resources they’ve expended on ZED. More, consider that ZED combines both My (vertical) and Mz (lateral) release under one mechanical, thus bringing us one setting for both y and z. Lastly, for 2018 anyway this could be the last word in lightweight yet fully functional tech bindings, and what is last is sometimes first. Z — Zero — G3 ZED.