Skeats — Simplified Ski Crampons — First Look


Post by WildSnow.com blogger | August 16, 2017      
Simplified ski crampon. Skeats strap to your planks, make short work of icy approaches.

Simplified ski crampon. Skeats strap to your planks, make short work of icy approaches.

Is that a crampon in your pocket, or you’re just glad to see me? Bulky ski crampons = storage dilemma. Kind of like those tire chains you hardly ever use… but there’s way more storage in your Subaru than your rucksack.

Enter the Skeat, a ski crampon that indeed fits in your pocket. Clearly, these little guys won’t do what a “blade” crampon does on a softer skin track, but it’s obvious they’ll act as ice cleats. I could have used these about a thousand times in Europe over the past decade, and on occasion in the “powder” mountains of Colorado. Apparently inventor Patrick Gasparro came up with the idea during icy approaches in the Tetons. He and friends have been using various versions for a few years, now going mainstream.

If you’ve ever strapped a chunk of rope (or moose antler you picked up in Garnet Canyon) to your skis as a traction device, you know the concept is valid. You probably also know the issue of such devices tending to slide forward and backwards on your ski; quite disconcerting. I found a way to mount a Skeat with a Dynafit binding that nicely stabilizes it, beyond that you’d want to really grinch the straps down while locating at the narrowest part of your sidecut or perhaps just behind your binding toe. Using with skins instead of slippery Ptex probably helps as well. We’ll test this coming winter, but I see no reason why Skeats wouldn’t work for their obvious purpose. That being icy conditions while climbing on skis.

Skeats come in two versions, stainless steel (right) and Delrin plastic.

Skeats come in two versions, Delrin plastic (left) and stainless steel, 48 grams and 90 grams each,respectively. For reference, a somewhat wide Dynafit compatible ski crampon weighs around 100 grams.

With a Dynafit Radical binding I strapped a Skeat just behind the brake pad, seemed like a good place.

With a Dynafit Radical binding I strapped a Skeat just behind the brake pad, seemed like a good location. Apparently they’ll work fine if tightly strapped at the narrowest part of your sidecut or perhaps just behind your binding toe units, over your climbing skins instead of slippery Ptex.

The Skeats equation for happy climbing.

The Skeats equation for happy climbing.


Comments

41 Responses to “Skeats — Simplified Ski Crampons — First Look”

  1. Gp August 16th, 2017 9:08 am

    We can make the same thing with strap and screw.

  2. Patrick Gasparro August 16th, 2017 9:29 am

    Hi GP,

    Yes, when I first invented the skin cleats that is just what I did! I took a ski strap and put screws through it. Just be sure to put some old skin fabric to pad the screw head so it doesn’t rip the skin on your ski. Really though, it too quite some time and energy and was not quite as stable laterally.

    Good luck with whatever you decide to do:)

  3. Louis Dawson August 16th, 2017 9:30 am

    cool! do they work with a voile strap instead of the included strap? Seems like a good way to reduce some weight and maybe a way to get them tighter around the ski?

  4. Lee August 16th, 2017 9:35 am

    Easy to carry size in pocket looks nice. Have you tested with Vipec, Ion and Kingpin too?

  5. Patrick Gasparro August 16th, 2017 10:42 am

    Hi Louis, They should work with a voile strap. The only problem is that the excess tends to get in the way. Originally, when I hand made the first few, I used a voille strap. As far as weight, the strap it Biothane strap comes with is lighter than a voile strap, and can also be used as a ski strap to keep your skis together when they go on your pack. You should be able to cinch it down tight enough and place it in the right spot on the ski so the strap doesn’t slide back and forth. Also the biothane strap is a bit sticky, so it tends to stay in place on the skin. The ultimate solution to keeping them in place is to cut a section out of your skin, the same width as the strap, in just the spot where you want the Skeat to go. Then it won’t ever move, and you don’t really give up much glide or grip when you aren’t using the Skeats anyway.

    Hope this helps.

  6. Patrick Gasparro August 16th, 2017 10:43 am

    Re: above. But just cut a thin bit out of the skin obviously. Not all the way through:)

  7. Patrick Gasparro August 16th, 2017 10:46 am

    Hi Lee,

    I am a telemarker. So I can say that they work great with all different tele bindings. Most of my friends, actually nearly all the younger folks these days, either rondo or split-board. And the Skeats work equally well in all those situations. Just depends where you have to place the Skeat underneath.

  8. DJ August 16th, 2017 11:08 am

    Brilliant! I mostly tele too and don’t want to install crampon mounts on all my skis so this is a great solution.

    Question – do the plastic ones grip as well as the steel at first and the big difference being durability, or do you experience much better bite with the steel ones?

  9. Andrei August 16th, 2017 11:11 am

    How wide are they? Meaning how wide are the skis they are pictured with? I imagine it would be difficult to mount a 115mm Skeat on 100mm skis.

  10. Patrick Gasparro August 16th, 2017 11:28 am

    Hi Andrei,

    The Skeats are currently made width a base plate of 100mm. So they work on any ski or split-board that is wider than 100mm at the waist. They work on any board up to about 135mm. So from 100mm-135mm you are good. Next year I plan to make some 85mm for the skinny ski lovers. And maybe even some skinnier for x-country skiers.
    Patrick

  11. Patrick Gasparro August 16th, 2017 12:05 pm

    Hi DJ,
    Nice! So the plastic work just fine on hard snow and ice…maybe not on blue ice though. But the plastic polymer will wear down faster and will break if you step hard onto solid rock.

    The steel ones grip even on hard blue ice and won’t break on rock. They are just slightly heavier, but hardly noticeably unless you are a back country racer or something.

    Basically, the plastic polymer is good for all but the most serious mountaineers. And for most situations the plastic work just fine.

  12. Patrick Gasparro August 16th, 2017 12:07 pm

    Also DJ,
    The Skeats system allows you to interchange the plates. All the components can be disassembled in about 3 minutes and then reassembled in case single part breaks or if in case you want to switch from the plastic to the stainless steel base plate:)

  13. DJ August 16th, 2017 4:14 pm

    Thanks! Your price is so good, there is no way I can justify not picking up a plastic pair, and a set of steel plates 🙂

  14. jbo August 16th, 2017 5:34 pm

    @Patrick – The skinny ski lovers don’t want to sacrifice glide 🙂

  15. Andrei August 16th, 2017 6:00 pm

    I bet if you turn the thing 90 degrees and make a holes for two straps on the long sides, you could use them on something super skinny AND wider… Won’t have to do any more machining other than instead of many holes, drilling 4 longish slots. Same weight savings but a little more utility since they will be multi-use… Just a thought. I could use that on my daughter’s 70mm wide touring skis.

  16. Andy Carey August 16th, 2017 6:14 pm

    I think a pair that would fit 84-90 mm waists would be great; my mountaineering skis (Vertex-X) that I bought for spring and summer hard snow & glacier skiing are 84 mm, my cho oyus 89 mm. and zero G85 and host of Dynafit mountaineering skis (where crampons are most likely to be used) are in that range.

  17. David August 16th, 2017 7:36 pm

    Hot dang! And I just shelled out for a pair of Dynafit crampons two weeks ago*sigh*.Question: would these be a good fit for skis in the 88-90 width range, or a tad too big/wide. Thanks Patrick, Lou

  18. Louie Dawson 3 August 16th, 2017 8:24 pm

    Thanks for answering all these questions Patrick, this is great! One thought I had: Is there a reason you didn’t make the teeth angled, so they perhaps would glide a bit better? Also an aluminium version would be really sweet…or maybe titanium 🙂

  19. Jusku August 16th, 2017 9:36 pm

    Seems great when youre having your skis flat on the ice.
    But how would they work on steeper climbs when youre on your edges? Crampons have that blade right on the edge.

  20. See August 17th, 2017 12:06 am

    If the 100mm plate is good for 100mm-135mm wide skis, are the skis shown in the top picture too narrow for the Skeats? Is there a problem if the Skeats stick out past the ski edge a bit?

  21. Dan August 17th, 2017 12:27 am

    So you basically trade off glide for a few grams? Why?

  22. Patrick Gasparro August 17th, 2017 5:38 am

    I’ll try to answer the previous few questions:
    1. Glide: a. We really only put on the skeats when the slope is steep enough that you don’t glide anyway. At this point you are really just stepping.

    b.But I have thought about teeth already, maybe for next year. I just received my patent a short while ago and I have lots of thoughts for improvements all the time.

    c. Also, re glide. So we put the skeats on and take them off without removing our skis. You just lay the skeat flat on the snow and step onto it, buckle and tighten. And then just snap them off. When the slope becomes gentle enough to glide you remove them.

    2. Materials: Aluminum is light weight, but very expensive to cast and less durable I understand. I think titanium would be great and I am looking into that, but I’m not sure how much more it would make them cost.

    3. Width of ski needs to be at least 100mm. If the Skeat sticks out off the ski it is a problem.

    4. It is not a trade-off with glide, because we only use the Skeats in situations where you’re only glide would be a backward slip.

    5. Edging on steep traverse. So, the “Skeating” technique is slightly different than “Skinning” technique in super steep situations. You try to keep skis flatter to the snow/ice and keep your tips pointed as much up the fall line as possible. And instead of going across the hill to make switch backs you go as straight up as possible and then when it is too steep keeping your skis pointed up the fall line just step up and to the side slightly to cross the slope. It works, even if this description is confusing.

    6. Maybe for next year I will have a pair of Skeats that are 85mm wide for the skinnier skis.

    I hope this helps. Please ask more questions or prompt me for more detail. I’ll do the best I can.

  23. Dan August 17th, 2017 5:45 am

    1C makes sense. Thanks FOR explaining that. Also a narrower option (6) would make a lot of sense.

  24. Patrick Gasparro August 17th, 2017 6:52 am

    Dan, your point about a narrower plate is dead on., and maybe more urgent than I had thought. Most of us in the Tetons are on skis at least 100mm wide because we get so much good powder…but I guess I have to consider the Sierra’s and other places where people use more skinny skis.
    I’m gonna see about making an 85mm in time for this winter. Do you think 85mm is thin enough or should I go even thinner? Do you think cross country skiers would use?

    Andrei had an interesting idea about rotating the plate 90 degrees and then putting two more holes for passing the strap through? Anyone have any thoughts on that?

    Patrick

  25. See August 17th, 2017 8:01 am

    Just a general comment about technique: if the terrain is approaching the limit of your ability to comfortably climb with the tools you’re using, it’s time to switch to tools more appropriate to climbing the next level of steepness, in my opinion. In other words, if you’re pushing your ski crampons to the point where you are struggling to avoid losing grip and falling, you should have switched to boot crampons sooner. Likewise with putting the ski crampons on before the skins stop working.

  26. wtofd August 17th, 2017 8:03 am

    Patrick, congrats, this is great.
    I imagine you’ll eventually need to handle skis in the 90s as well. Lots of folks on them.
    You’ll have to beta test the 90 degree rotation idea. It’s a good one, but time will tell. Simple is better. Definitely want to make the straps replaceable with Voile straps. Even if yours are better (stronger, stickier) you’ll want to allow for field repairs/replacement. Voile straps are ubiquitous in the BC.
    Keep going. Great stuff.

  27. Patrick Gasparro August 17th, 2017 8:56 am

    Thanks., Wtofd.
    The Skeats™ really are compatible with the Voile™ ski strap or any other ski strap right now. The only problem is that there is usually left over strap that flaps around. Not that big a deal though, and certainly works well enough in a jam. 🙂

  28. Patrick Gasparro August 17th, 2017 9:02 am

    Hi See,

    I appreciate your thought process. However certain situations do call for the Skeats™:

    In the Tetons we have found many situations where there is a thick crust of snow that is supportable with your skis on, but that you would punch through with skis off. Sometimes sinking in up to your knees or deeper! At these times the snow is often slick and icy so that you begin to slip back with skins on even on terrain that is not very steep. So you would definitely not want to boot pack it and Skeats™ make it so much more efficient and pleasurable.

    And sometimes you have to go up a lot of this south facing crap to get to the good powder on the north facing slopes!!

    Hope you try them out for yourself:)

    Patrick

  29. Lou Dawson 2 August 17th, 2017 9:39 am

    We get a similar snowpack in Colorado, when you can go on hard crust with skis and crampons, but you take your skis off, try to boot, and sink up to knees or deeper. Happens quite often during later winter and spring. Lou

  30. Andrei August 17th, 2017 9:53 am

    Utah is the same. Totally stoked to try these things out this season.

    I had another quick question. Is there a reason why you guys put the spikes all in a row? I would think they’d grip better if they were staggered a bit. Could help with the strap slots in the other direction as well.

  31. See August 17th, 2017 9:57 am

    Understood about breakable crust, and I’m not trying to suggest that Skeats/ski crampons are not useful tools. I’m just saying that it is a fairly common mistake on a slope of increasing steepness to climb past the point where it’s comfortable to stop and switch to skins with ski crampons or boot crampons, and that this practice is needlessly inconvenient and can even be dangerous. I can’t recall encountering such a situation in breakable crust (which can probably be found anywhere in the world where you find snow at some time).

  32. See August 17th, 2017 10:05 am

    (except maybe the south pole, etc.)

  33. wtofd August 17th, 2017 12:43 pm

    See, I am guilty of this. I keep the skins on even though I know it’s getting too steep and I’m passing by safe or convenient transition zones. My partners. who always stop lower but transition faster, come chugging by as I struggle to keep loose gear on the hill.

  34. See August 17th, 2017 1:09 pm

    Yeah, wtofd, I’m speaking from experience on this one.

  35. Patrick Gasparro August 17th, 2017 1:51 pm

    Good point about the alignment of the spikes Andrei! The only reason they are inline is because when I first made them on a skinnier Voile strap I just put screws into the holes that are lined up. Now width a wider plate I have had a few people suggest altering the alignment and shape of the spikes and we are already starting to play with the design. Thanks to everyone for bringing so much to this process. Awesome!!

  36. Patrick Gasparro August 17th, 2017 1:52 pm

    Yes See. I think that most of us chargers like to push things to far. Skinning where it is a bit sketchy is not unusual in the Tetons..haha

  37. SteveR August 17th, 2017 2:24 pm

    Need to be available in a range of widths (like harscheisen). 65/80/90/100 mm.

  38. Andrei August 17th, 2017 3:06 pm

    So if you make one size that’s about 65mm by 100mm with staggered spikes and slots for the strap in both directions, you could use the same one for narrow and wide skis. Now there’s a crowd sourcing design strategy for ya… LOL Wouldn’t even have to change the shape of the spikes. It would keep the thing multidirectional and therefore minimize installation headaches and manufacturing multiple sizes…

  39. Wookie1974 August 18th, 2017 8:22 am

    really nice idea. Put them in a little pack with a blob of skin wax and an aborbant piece of towel – and the whole thing is a great christmas gift.

    You can use them to climb if its icy
    You can use the hard edge to clean skins when they glom – the way we all do with a credit card usually

    oh – and it needs to be in black, or Lou will not use it.

    dont even get me started on adjustable width skeats.

  40. stephen August 20th, 2017 6:00 pm

    I’m definitely interested in 85mm and/or narrower versions (~65mm) if/when they exist. (We don’t get deep powder here in Oz.) Great idea!

  41. Lee Sharp September 11th, 2017 9:04 am

    This looks like an interesting design for milder gradients. I used to like the SKALP crampon but don’t think its made anymore – certainly not for wider skis.

    I’ve never understood whilst the major binding companies don’t make their crampons stack (one inside the other) – if one crampons is a few mm wider than the other it makes absolutely no difference in use but is way easier to pack or strap on to your backpack.

Got something to say? Please do so.





Anti-Spam Quiz:

You can subscribe to comment notification by checking the box to left, but you must leave a brief comment to do so, which records your email and requires you to use our anti-spam challange. If you don't like leaving substantive comments that's fine, just leave a simple comment that says something like "thanks, subscribed" with a made-up name. Check the comment subscription checkbox BEFORE you submit.
If you need an emoticon for a comment just copy/paste off the following list, or use text code you might be familiar with.

:D    :-)    :(    :lol:    :x    :P    :oops:    :cry:    :evil:    :twisted:    :roll:    :wink:    :!:    :?:    :idea:    :arrow:   
  
Due to comment spam we moderate most comments. Please do not submit your comment twice -- it will appear shortly after approval. Comments with one or more links in the text may be held in moderation, for spam prevention. If you'd like to publish a photo in a comment, contact us. Guidelines: Be civil, no personal attacks, avoid vulgarity and profanity.

  Your Comments

  • Lou Dawson 2: Sam, thanks, perhaps that's #7, as it can slip by the person installing the...
  • Sam: Another common problem I've encountered over the years is premature contact...
  • James Moss: Thanks Dave!...
  • Ted D: If you use the model with brakes, can they be easily removed if one wants t...
  • Thom Mackris: One nit I have to pick with manufacturers of most tech bindings is the fact...
  • Dave Smith: An interesting look back at a rudimentary technology. Snowy Torrents I doc...
  • Lou Dawson 2: Patrick, can you be more clear? Are you talking about the boot ending up to...
  • Patrick: An oddly frequent error from shops that don't mount many tech bindings: bin...
  • Lou Dawson 2: Mounting the heel first is key, but can be done _after_ drilling all holes ...
  • XXX_er: I asked the local shop guy/ski bud how he mounted AT and he gave me a real ...
  • JCoates: I agree with atfred. I'm about 50% success rate with shoulder reductions in...
  • Camilo: Thanks Lou! For #1, a key tip is to mount bindings using both boots, espec...
  • Lou Dawson 2: Sure, especially if the bindings was "worked" for a few days....
  • atfred: Would one stripped screw (out of four or five) really cause a binding to ri...
  • Trevor: Thanks Trollanski and Lou!...
  • Dave: I remember a version of the avalanche cord that was wound up on a reel that...
  • Rudi: I understand the "Tour Lite" wont be available in NA this year. Anybody kno...
  • Jim Pace: I've seen/experienced every one of these. You covered it all I think. On ...
  • See: It seems to me that if you attempt to fix problem 2 on Mt. Olympus using th...
  • Charlie Hagedorn: Great checklist, Lou! Especially valuable for someone new to tech bindings....
  • Lou Dawson 2: Trollan, thanks for noticing Trevor's message, I indeed missed it! Your com...
  • trollanski: Hey Trevor. Saw that you did not get a response on this one, but these two...
  • Jim Milstein: "Alpine ski touring" vs "nordic ski touring" is excellent! These phrases se...
  • atfred: One caveat re a dislocated shoulder (from personal experience), if you're j...
  • Lou Dawson 2: Russell, there is no one ski/binding/boot combo that will do everything. If...
  • Raz: Thanks for your answer. I am doing the first major gear upgrade in many yea...
  • Lou Dawson 2: Raz, with all due respect, it's ridiculous to evaluate a ski binding by its...
  • Russell McGinnis: Dave - It functions similarly to a regular Alpine bindings by having the la...
  • Raz: I am about to install the Tecton on a pair of Blizzard Zero G 108 - 185 cm....
  • Jonathan Moceri: VTskier, Thanks for bringing up the dislocated shoulder scenario. Wh...

  Recent Posts


Welcome to Louis (Lou) Dawson's backcountry skiing information & opinion website. Lou's passion for the past 50 years has been alpinism, climbing, mountaineering and skiing -- along with all manner of outdoor recreation. He has authored numerous books and articles about ski touring and is well known as the first person to ski down all 54 of Colorado's 14,000-foot peaks, otherwise known as the Fourteeners! Books and free ski touring news and information here.

All material on this website is copyrighted, the name WildSnow is trademarked, permission required for reproduction (electronic or otherwise) and display on other websites. PLEASE SEE OUR COPYRIGHT and TRADEMARK INFORMATION.

Backcountry skiing is dangerous. You may be killed or severely injured if you do any form of ski mountaineering, skimo randonnee and randonnée skiing. The information and news on this website is intended only as general information. While the authors and editors of the information on this website make every effort to present useful information about ski mountaineering, due to human error and passing time, the information, text and images contained within this website may be inaccurate, false, or out-of-date. By using, reading or viewing the information provided on this website, you agree to absolve the owners of Wild Snow as well as content contributors of any liability for injuries or losses incurred while using such information. Furthermore, you agree to use any of this website's information, maps, photos, or binding mounting instructions templates at your own risk, and waive Wild Snow owners and contributors of liability for use of said items for ski touring or any other use.

Switch To Mobile Version