A Fortnight of Planks #3 – Atomic Kongur


Post by WildSnow.com blogger | April 5, 2006      

Shop for Atomic skis.

I spent quite a few days this past winter on two pairs of Atomic Kongurs, a 177 cm and 168 cm (both mounted with Dynafit). Overall impression: a nice all-around ski that can be pressed into service for anything from powder to bumps. For all but the steepest tightest terrain I prefer the 177, but the 168 skis almost as well for me, and thus became my choice for most tours as I love the convenient handling and lighter weight of a midget ski. (Bear in mind that I don’t ski fast in the backcountry, and don’t usually jump off anything taller than I am, so I don’t need a ski with stability at speed.). As with most good quality skis of this width (83mm waist) the Kongurs handled powder and crud with aplomb, and with a proper tune they had adequate edge hold on hardpack, though this is not what I’d call a hardpack edging ski. I like a ski that’s not too damp, and the Kongur delivered in that area, perhaps because of a metal layer in the build. In all, this is a fun ski that can be a good value as it’s sold as a “telemark” ski with the corresponding lower price-point.

Atomic Kongur
The burning question is how the Kongur compares to the previous TMX model it replaced. First, know the TMX and Kongur are exactly the same dimensions, with the same molding pattern on top and same bottom to top thickness, and thus probably come from the same mold. As for weight (177cm single ski), Kongur is 55.5 oz (1573 g), TMX is 56.1 oz (1588 g). Kongur marketing claimed it was a lighter ski — true — but saving a whopping 0.6 ounces per ski is not cause for celebration. Static tested side-by-side, the Kongur is slightly softer than the TMX and has slightly less camber. This makes sense, as it is said skis with a metal layer can be made more limber and still maintain a least a modicum of edge hold for hardpack. I’m aware of how well the TMX is liked, and how tough it is to duplicate the feel of a favored ski. The fairest thing I can say is that it does a disservice to the Atomic ski designers to ask the Kongur to duplicate the TMX — it’s not the same ski. And yes, if you like the TMX you will find the Kongur to be different. In other words, don’t think you’re getting another pair of TMX when you buy the Kongur.

Skied without a tune these skis would have been awful (I know, I tried). I suspect that many skis are first used with the factory “mystery tune” — a bad foundation if you want an accurate first impression. I recommend tuning most backcountry skis with a 1×1 (bottom/side) bevel so you end up with a 90 degree edge angle along with the 1 degree base bevel, and aggressively dulling the tips and tails down to the snow contact area, then slightly past that point if the ski still feels too “edgy.” If skis tuned this way seem too washy on hardpack, change the side bevel to 2 degrees for more edge bite, and perhaps try 3 degrees.

In my opinion the Kongur is a good ski, but if you’re a TMX fan I’d advise a demo before you buy.


Comments

8 Responses to “A Fortnight of Planks #3 – Atomic Kongur”

  1. Mark April 10th, 2006 7:37 am

    Skied the Kongurs briefly and liked ’em too. Wish I had more time to review, but overall, they seemed like a ski bc afficionados could gravitate to.

    Mark

  2. Sparky December 5th, 2007 6:35 pm

    Hi Lou,

    Just wondering where/how you mounted up the kongurs? Were the markings useful? Thanks.

  3. Lou December 5th, 2007 6:48 pm

    Sparky, I’m pretty sure I used the mounting mark on the ski and just matched it to mid-sole mark on boot. But it was a while ago. I have one pair still here, can look at them if you like.

  4. Sparky December 5th, 2007 7:02 pm

    I figured it would be boot center, but if you’ve got the 177’s sitting beside the computer, sure. Thanks again.

  5. Karen January 7th, 2008 10:15 pm

    Mind if I ask how tall/heavy you are? I’m trying to figure out if the Kongur 161 is ok for me at 5’5″ and 150 pounds. Thanks

  6. Lou January 8th, 2008 1:20 am

    I’m 5’11” around 155 lbs

  7. DT November 22nd, 2009 6:14 pm

    Lou,

    Just wondering what your 2009 thoughts are on base x edge bevel for BC touring skis. Are you still a fan of 1×1 with the rockered skis? Just for reference- I’ve got a 0.5 x 3 on my in-bounds set-up and love how carvy it is at speed. If I’ve missed a past blog on this, just lemme know and I’ll go to that instead to save you some response time.

    Thanks,

    Dan

  8. Lou November 22nd, 2009 6:40 pm

    Dan, what I always do is try the factory bevel first. If I like it, I try to figure out what it is (by asking, or looking). If I don’t like it I tweak. What usually happens with me is the ski has too much base bevel and I have trouble getting an edge on hardpack due to my funky leg ergonomics (let’s just say I’ll never be a ski racer.) So, I guess what I’m saying is there is no good formula in my opinion.

Got something to say? Please do so.





Anti-Spam Quiz:

You can subscribe to comment notification by checking the box to left, but you must leave a brief comment to do so, which records your email and requires you to use our anti-spam challange. If you don't like leaving substantive comments that's fine, just leave a simple comment that says something like "thanks, subscribed" with a made-up name. Check the comment subscription checkbox BEFORE you submit.
If you need an emoticon for a comment just copy/paste off the following list, or use text code you might be familiar with.

:D    :-)    :(    :lol:    :x    :P    :oops:    :cry:    :evil:    :twisted:    :roll:    :wink:    :!:    :?:    :idea:    :arrow:   
  
Due to comment spam we moderate most comments. Please do not submit your comment twice -- it will appear shortly after approval. Comments with one or more links in the text may be held in moderation, for spam prevention. If you'd like to publish a photo in a comment, contact us. Guidelines: Be civil, no personal attacks, avoid vulgarity and profanity.

  Your Comments

  • See: Thanks for the science, Lou. I couldn’t believe those screws would hold in ...
  • XXX_er: I think steel is likely to be more hardy and aluminum looks purdier but at...
  • Alex: Dabe, Thank you! I really like the spitfires. Sportiva boots fit my feet su...
  • Cody: sooo....when are we going to get a topless on snow review? :P...
  • Lou Dawson 2: Zippy, thanks for your patience. Jim, please go easy on the attempts at hum...
  • Dabe: How do you like your spitfires? Great report & photos!...
  • Jim Milstein: A longitudinal line runs lengthwise along the ski. There can be no dispute ...
  • Frame: Zippi, I think it comes down to interpretation. I interpret longitudinal ce...
  • atfred: How about "ski width midpoint"? Points should be the same wherever measured...
  • trollanski: High five to Roman Dial and others for proving this...Great vids on youtube...
  • Thom Mackris: In case any Coloradans are interested, I just learned that the 1st Annual C...
  • Joe John: Looks like fun. Someone should send one to the German that swims to work i...
  • zippy the pinhead: Hi Jim, I fail to understand why you insist on using a word which relate...
  • Jim Milstein: Longitudinal center line is exactly the term you want. No ambiguity. If you...
  • zippy the pinhead: Exercising my search-engine-fu, I came up with a couple of antonyms for lon...
  • Sedgesprite: AKA: Poor Man's Supercub. Roman Dial has been advocating them for years. Eq...
  • Lisa Dawson: Sure looks like fun. My achy knees agree!...
  • Alex: alas....if only a kayak could fit in my packpack, yes I would have a melt d...
  • biggb: Shhhh ... don't tell this guy about whitewater kayaking ... he might have a...
  • Crazy Horse: Lou, the thing is, solutions that actually have a chance of solving the hou...
  • Jim Milstein: Center line...
  • Lou Dawson 2: Crazy, I keep thinking that if the political will was there, then the land ...
  • Lou Dawson 2: Bill, re the waste disposal, it's handled just like any other hook ups....
  • Lou Dawson 2: Zippy and all, I agree, longitudinal is probably not the best word. I did a...
  • Lou Dawson 2: Afox, yeah, the way most ski graphics are applied to skis is not inherently...
  • Matus: I usually measure the real width on the base side of the ski. Much quicker ...
  • Torquil: 1) print off Wild Snow paper template. 2) trim the template to fit on t...
  • afox: The binding freedom self centering guide block is worth every penny! htt...
  • afox: I use the paper method. Its a PITA but works well. If a ski manufacture...
  • See: In above comment, the “front set of holes” and “the holes at the back of th...

  Recent Posts


Welcome to Louis (Lou) Dawson's backcountry skiing information & opinion website. Lou's passion for the past 50 years has been alpinism, climbing, mountaineering and skiing -- along with all manner of outdoor recreation. He has authored numerous books and articles about ski touring and is well known as the first person to ski down all 54 of Colorado's 14,000-foot peaks, otherwise known as the Fourteeners! Books and free ski touring news and information here.

All material on this website is copyrighted, the name WildSnow is trademarked, permission required for reproduction (electronic or otherwise) and display on other websites. PLEASE SEE OUR COPYRIGHT and TRADEMARK INFORMATION.

Backcountry skiing is dangerous. You may be killed or severely injured if you do any form of ski mountaineering, skimo randonnee and randonnée skiing. The information and news on this website is intended only as general information. While the authors and editors of the information on this website make every effort to present useful information about ski mountaineering, due to human error the information, text and images contained within this website may be inaccurate, false, or out-of-date. By using, reading or viewing the information provided on this website, you agree to absolve the owners of Wild Snow as well as content contributors of any liability for injuries or losses incurred while using such information. Furthermore, you agree to use any of this website's information, maps, photos, or binding mounting instructions templates at your own risk, and waive Wild Snow owners and contributors of liability for use of said items for ski touring or any other use.

Switch To Mobile Version