Outdoor Research Skyward Jacket and Pants — Review


Post by WildSnow.com blogger | June 9, 2017      

When I lived in Colorado, I skied almost exclusively in softshell pants and jacket, only using Gore-Tex® during the nastiest storm days, or as an emergency layer buried in my pack (mostly in the spring). I tried that when I moved to the wet and scrappy Pacific Northwest, but it didn’t work so well. The results were somewhat similar to sailing around Cape Horn in a T-shirt. I soon ditched softshell for Gore-Tex®, and haven’t looked back. Nowadays the only time you’ll see me in softshell gear is in the springtime, or during our semi-annual “Juneuary” midwinter high pressure events. Or when I’m back in sunny Colorado.

Blocking the wind with the OR Skyward jacket a few weeks ago near Rogers Pass.

Blocking the wind with Outdoor Research Skyward jacket near Rogers Pass.

Hardshell clothes work fairly well at keeping you dry, but the breathability of such still leaves a lot to be desired. I usually remove my shell while skinning, and leg vents are my friends. Outdoor Research’s new AscentShell™ fabric aims to be a “waterproof” softshell fabric, that has the waterproofness of a hardshell, while increasing breathability. Their claims piqued my interest, and I tried it out this winter.

Skyward jacket and pants are the flagship pieces for OR’s AscentShell™ fabric. At first glance, the gear looks like a pair of waterproof bibs and a storm shell. The fabric is fairly thin, feels much more like a stretchy hard-shell material than a softshell. This is good, since another disadvantage with traditional softshells is the fabric’s weight and bulk compared to a hardshell.

Skyward pants are a “convertible” bib pant: standard ski pant with a zip-off breathable bib piece that attaches around the waist. They have two long zippered side vents, and detachable powder gaiters.

The pants have a variety of pockets, including two hip pockets, one right hand front thigh pocket, one left hand rear-thigh pocket, a right hand rear pocket, and a small front pocket on the removable bib portion. In the right hand hip pocket there’s an interior mesh beacon pocket, with a carabiner clip for the lanyard (like many of OR’s pants). That might be a bit much in the pocket department, but most are appreciated.

Another notable feature is that the powder gaiters have a little slot in the side through which a boot’s power strap can be routed, so you don’t have to move the gaiter to adjust the power strap. Nice touch. I have the pants in size medium, and they fit my 5 foot 10 inch frame well.

The OR Skyward Jacket

The OR Skyward Jacket

The OR Skyward Pants

Outdoor Research Skyward Pants.

Inside of the Skyward Jacket. Note the big mesh drop-in pockets, always a great feature.

Inside the Skyward Jacket. Note the big mesh drop-in pockets, always an excellent feature.

Skyward Jacket
The jacket has two hip pockets, two chest pockets and two interior drop-in pockets (once you use them, you’ll be addicted). All pockets open into an interior mesh surface, allowing them to do double duty as vents. OR’s signature full-length pit-zips extend all the way to the hem of the jacket. While the jacket has a permanent hood, it also has a full collar that separates the neck from the hood, useful for keeping snow and water from draining down the back of your neck. The Skyward would be simpler and slightly lighter without the hip pockets, which are somewhat useless when you’re wearing a backpack — though they do come in handy at trailheads and coffee bars.

I ordered the jacket in a size large, so it would comfortably fit over layers. It fits well, albeit a little baggy. If you’re looking for a more trim look and you’re my size (5’10’’, 150 lbs) then size down to medium.

The Pacific Northwest is wet, and 2016/2017 was no exception. I’ve been using the Skyward jacket and pants all season, and got a really good feel for how they perform in a variety of weather conditions. I used them both in the backcountry and on the ski area, in everything from sunshine to torrential downpours.

There were two occasions where the fabric seemed to fail, and my inner layers got wet. One was standing around for five hours in the rain during an avalanche class, and the other was skiing Jackson Hole Resort in a torrential thunderstorm; two of the wettest ski experiences I’ve had in awhile.

In both instances the crotch area of the pants leaked a bit and my long underwear got wet. Despite what my long underwear looked like, I promise I didn’t have an “accident.” Interestingly the fabric was perfectly waterproof elsewhere on the jacket and the pants.

The issue could have been the result of the non-waterproof front zip on the pants. Or, perhaps just that that area gets the full brunt of the weather, while also being crunched and creased by leg movement, which is enough to force water through the fabric. Regardless, it shows the pants aren’t quite equivalent to a pair of full bore Gore-Tex® bibs. (Though during those wet events, some of the folks in hardshell gear did get wet, so perhaps I’m being too demanding?)

I wore the Skyward pants in a variety of lighter rain storms and heavy wet snow storms, and stayed dry. The AscentShell™ fabric is certainly an order of magnitude more waterproof than any softshell fabric I have seen. I wouldn’t even consider using anything other than a hardshell throughout most of the PNW winter. However, the AscentShell™ fabric does the trick just fine.

In the future, I’ll continue using the Skyward jacket and pants in nearly all weather conditions, with the exception of when the forecast calls for exceptionally heavy rain. When that happens I’ll be on the couch, or if I’m forced outside into the deluge, I’ll be in wall-to-wall Gore-Tex®.

Shop for Outdoor Research ski clothing here.


Comments

6 Responses to “Outdoor Research Skyward Jacket and Pants — Review”

  1. Rod Georgiu June 9th, 2017 9:35 am

    How breathable is it?

  2. Maciej Pike-Biegunski June 9th, 2017 10:01 am

    Mount Green in the photo?

  3. See June 9th, 2017 10:33 am

    Under what circumstances is a separate collar on a hooded jacket a desirable feature?

  4. Frame June 12th, 2017 7:09 am

    See, for me it’s when it’s not raining and you are wearing another type of hat. i don’t like hoods much to be honest, would rather wear a separate hat, that doesn’t restrict peripheral vision as much, hearing or movement. I like a nice high collar to come up snug around the neck to keep out the wind or protect your chin.

    Same with base and mid-layers, to many hoods for my liking. what are you supposed to do with 2 or more hoods… sorry for the rant.

  5. See June 12th, 2017 8:24 am

    Thanks Frame. Point taken. I used to dislike hoods, but I changed my mind when I found jackets with hoods that fit well over my helmet and could be cinched down for use without the helmet. My OR Iceline jacket even has a stiff brim that can be folded under for use without a helmet, without much additional adjustment.

    Lately I’ve been on kind of a hood kick. On a fleece, I like the versatility for quick adjustments to suit changing activity level, altitude, wind, weather, etc. while climbing. On puffies, for when I want to add a lot of warmth fast, like during a lunch break (don’t get me started on lunch breaks). But having so many hoods can definitely be a pita. My gear and technique choices are always evolving, and I appreciate hearing other people’s thoughts.

  6. Lou Dawson 2 June 12th, 2017 8:25 am

    Same here, in climates like Colorado a hood is often unnecessary and just catches wind and snow. I’ve gotten more used to hoods since they’ve become ubiquitous, but in our home climate usually am fine without and prefer to not have it. Lou

Got something to say? Please do so.





Anti-Spam Quiz:

You can subscribe to comment notification by checking the box to left, but you must leave a brief comment to do so, which records your email and requires you to use our anti-spam challange. If you don't like leaving substantive comments that's fine, just leave a simple comment that says something like "thanks, subscribed" with a made-up name. Check the comment subscription checkbox BEFORE you submit.
If you need an emoticon for a comment just copy/paste off the following list, or use text code you might be familiar with.

:D    :-)    :(    :lol:    :x    :P    :oops:    :cry:    :evil:    :twisted:    :roll:    :wink:    :!:    :?:    :idea:    :arrow:   
  
Due to comment spam we moderate most comments. Please do not submit your comment twice -- it will appear shortly after approval. Comments with one or more links in the text may be held in moderation, for spam prevention. If you'd like to publish a photo in a comment, contact us. Guidelines: Be civil, no personal attacks, avoid vulgarity and profanity.

  Your Comments

  • Lou Dawson 2: The ATK did do well in my evaluations. Lots of people like them. Lou...
  • HansDampf: In 2014 I contacted Völkl and asked for the required distance of drilling h...
  • Wookie1974: really nice idea. Put them in a little pack with a blob of skin wax and an ...
  • See: I too am ready to be amazed, but the graphic on the Bauer website comparing...
  • Andrei: So if you make one size that's about 65mm by 100mm with staggered spikes an...
  • SteveR: Need to be available in a range of widths (like harscheisen). 65/80/90/100 ...
  • Patrick Gasparro: Yes See. I think that most of us chargers like to push things to far. Ski...
  • Patrick Gasparro: Good point about the alignment of the spikes Andrei! The only reason they ...
  • See: Yeah, wtofd, I'm speaking from experience on this one....
  • wtofd: See, I am guilty of this. I keep the skins on even though I know it's getti...
  • Frank Kvietok: Very interested to learn more about and try 'Thindown'. Should allow for s...
  • See: (except maybe the south pole, etc.)...
  • See: Understood about breakable crust, and I’m not trying to suggest that Skeats...
  • Andrei: Utah is the same. Totally stoked to try these things out this season. I ...
  • Lou Dawson 2: We get a similar snowpack in Colorado, when you can go on hard crust with s...
  • Patrick Gasparro: Hi See, I appreciate your thought process. However certain situations d...
  • Patrick Gasparro: Thanks., Wtofd. The Skeats™ really are compatible with the Voile™ ski st...
  • Lou Dawson 2: It's so attractive, the goal of having a quiver of one that'll work on or o...
  • wtofd: Patrick, congrats, this is great. I imagine you'll eventually need to hand...
  • See: Just a general comment about technique: if the terrain is approaching the l...
  • David Dodge: Hi Lou, I'm aware of the Vipec. I think it solves the fundamental proble...
  • Patrick Gasparro: Dan, your point about a narrower plate is dead on., and maybe more urgent ...
  • Dan: 1C makes sense. Thanks FOR explaining that. Also a narrower option (6) woul...
  • Patrick Gasparro: I'll try to answer the previous few questions: 1. Glide: a. We really onl...
  • Dan: So you basically trade off glide for a few grams? Why?...
  • See: If the 100mm plate is good for 100mm-135mm wide skis, are the skis shown in...
  • Jusku: Seems great when youre having your skis flat on the ice. But how would the...
  • Louie Dawson 3: Thanks for answering all these questions Patrick, this is great! One though...
  • David: Hot dang! And I just shelled out for a pair of Dynafit crampons two weeks a...
  • Andy Carey: I think a pair that would fit 84-90 mm waists would be great; my mountainee...

  Recent Posts


Welcome to Louis (Lou) Dawson's backcountry skiing information & opinion website. Lou's passion for the past 50 years has been alpinism, climbing, mountaineering and skiing -- along with all manner of outdoor recreation. He has authored numerous books and articles about ski touring and is well known as the first person to ski down all 54 of Colorado's 14,000-foot peaks, otherwise known as the Fourteeners! Books and free ski touring news and information here.

All material on this website is copyrighted, the name WildSnow is trademarked, permission required for reproduction (electronic or otherwise) and display on other websites. PLEASE SEE OUR COPYRIGHT and TRADEMARK INFORMATION.

Backcountry skiing is dangerous. You may be killed or severely injured if you do any form of ski mountaineering, skimo randonnee and randonnée skiing. The information and news on this website is intended only as general information. While the authors and editors of the information on this website make every effort to present useful information about ski mountaineering, due to human error and passing time, the information, text and images contained within this website may be inaccurate, false, or out-of-date. By using, reading or viewing the information provided on this website, you agree to absolve the owners of Wild Snow as well as content contributors of any liability for injuries or losses incurred while using such information. Furthermore, you agree to use any of this website's information, maps, photos, or binding mounting instructions templates at your own risk, and waive Wild Snow owners and contributors of liability for use of said items for ski touring or any other use.

Switch To Mobile Version