Alugator Light — Mammut Avalanche Rescue Shovel Exam


Post by WildSnow.com blogger | November 11, 2016      
Alugator shovel, a bit camera distorted, blade is larger than it looks.

Alugator shovel, a bit camera distorted, blade is larger than it looks at 25×21 cm.

Nice shovel. Excellent weight, size is good compromise between packing and digging. While we prefer a slightly larger blade for extensive pit work or traveling in high-risk situations — we’re fine with this as an everyday tool. The skeletonized Alugator avalanche shovel blade has numerous slots you can use for lashing to a pack or building a rescue sled (or creating a deadman snow anchor). Blade edge is sharp and serrated. We prefer a straight edge that’s blunted, but five minutes with the disk grinder solved the problem.

Fixation button and lead-in notch, very simple and super effective.

Fixation button and lead-in notch, very simple and super effective.

Best Alugator feature? Lead-in notch for inserting the ovalized shaft eliminates fumbling, as well as protecting the shaft-blade fixation button from being accidentally depressed. I’ve been thinking quite a bit lately about the future of avalanche safety. Clearly, in the event of a burial the challenge is time. Speed of your beacon search is factor two (though incessantly harped on in beacon PR as factor one). Factor one is how fast you can dig. Saving a second or two in the time it takes to get your rescue kit out might not seem a big deal, but the seconds can really stack up when you start fumbling with probes, shovel shafts and whatnot. Ideally, a shovel and probe that nearly deploy themselves would be ideal. Getting closer. Little things help.

To the point.

To the point.

We don't like sharp scalloped blades. You might. Solution for us is quality time with disk grinder.

We don’t like sharp scalloped blades. You might. Solution for us is quality time with disk grinder.

All shovels should have flat places for your feet in case you have to go nuclear.

All shovels should have flat places for your feet in case you have to go nuclear. Present here, with reinforcement.

Alugator ski touring shovel weights:
Total: 472 grams
Blade: 270 grams
Shaft: 202 grams

Dimensions:
Shaft, collapsed and inserted, 31 cm
Shaft, collapsed and removed from shovel, 38 cm
Shaft, extended, inserted in shovel, 52 cm
Total length with shaft extended, 75 cm
Blade 25 x 21 cm

Shop for Alugator and other Mammut ski touring shovels.

Comments

19 Responses to “Alugator Light — Mammut Avalanche Rescue Shovel Exam”

  1. Jack November 11th, 2016 11:03 am

    Lou, Would you please elaborate on the scalloped/sharp vs. straight/blunt preference?

  2. Lou Dawson 2 November 11th, 2016 11:12 am

    Sure, scalloped sharp is for cutting skin, damaging your backpack, and looking good on the store shelf. Flat blunt is for scraping tent platforms, sculpting columns in snowpits, and digging people out of avalanches. “Blunt” still cuts pretty well, the alu is thin. Lou

  3. Charlie Hagedorn November 11th, 2016 11:22 am

    Do you plan to put reviewed shovels to a strength/abuse test?

    The 2009 Genswein shovel test had a profound impact on my choice of shovel. I’ve seen two ~2006-era aluminum shovels break/crack in fairly light regular use. https://measuredmass.com/2014/02/03/fatigue/

    Like an avalanche probe, our day-to-day experience with shovels is one of light use in pits and unpleasant weight in the pack. But when it comes time for a rescue, we have to be able to trust the tools that might bring our partner back from the dead.

  4. Matus November 11th, 2016 11:26 am

    Lou, did you do some real world testing? I like light stuff but lightness usually goes with weakness. Is this the case or the shovel is comparable to its 600+ g sisters and brothers?

  5. Lou Dawson 2 November 11th, 2016 11:41 am

    Real world testing is coming, but I’m confident or I would not have published this look. Lou

  6. Lou Dawson 2 November 11th, 2016 11:49 am

    The Genswein test is BS overkill for dedicated avalanche rescue (as opposed to body recovery) requirements and emergency survival, in my opinion. It’s valid for shovels that are used constantly, for a variety of purposes such as digging out automobiles from snowplow berms, stuff like that. Valid if you read between the lines and realize that.

    I think it’s easy to test a dedicated avalanche rescue shove. Go dig for a half hour or so in moderatly dense snow and see if anything untoward happens. Like cracks developing, handles coming undone, weird flexing etc. If it feels good, it’s probably good. You can also do the pry test. Trap the blade somehow (between boards on your outdoor deck, for example) and pry. See if you can apply typical force you’d use in a rescue dig and add a little more. If it doesn’t bend or break, you’re good.

    I did the deck board test and got a pass, the reinforced blade and ovalized handle stood up.

    Lou

  7. Charlie Hagedorn November 11th, 2016 12:24 pm

    Great – thanks!

    I do think that our durability expectations for a new shovel should substantially exceed that required for a single rescue. When we’re asking students and partners to practice over and over again at full rescue speed, we’re putting that rescue stress on the shovel multiple times.

    On the lightest-weight shovels, it might be appropriate for manufacturers to help us quantitatively understand how much duty each shovel is designed for. They do that now, to an extent, by marketing some shovels toward professional rescuers, but I’ve not seen a “this shovel is good for 100 days of regular use and 3 rescues” or something similar.

  8. Lou Dawson 2 November 11th, 2016 1:09 pm

    Charlie, for those of us who are highly active in the sport, a quiver of a few shovels is not unreasonable. As for what they say in marketing spreech, that is very dangerous when you start making specific claims with numbers and such.

    Good point about how much wear and tear that practice places on the shovel. It would not be unreasonable to use a sacrifice shovel for practice, and keep the nice fresh one in the backpack for that “one time.”

    No shovel that’s reasonable in weight can hold up forever… Even a steel dirt spade has a lifespan. I’ve broken handles and blades on those during my construction days.

    Lou

  9. Charlie Hagedorn November 11th, 2016 3:14 pm

    Agreed – thanks! :).

  10. Lou Dawson 2 November 11th, 2016 5:55 pm

    In case you want to mod a shovel blade, disk grinder with 60 grit “flapper” disk and some water spray does the job. Lou

  11. Aaron Mattix November 12th, 2016 6:21 am

    Perhaps an upcoming shovel shoot-out? Just starting to shop for any avy shovel myself, and am quite fascinated by the BCA Dozer Hoe, as it most resembles the trail tools I use on a regular basis. It’s over twice the weight of the Alugator, but the effectiveness of the hoe design in moving more volume of material seems it would outweigh light weight deployability.

  12. Hacksaw November 12th, 2016 5:33 pm

    Why do so called designer keep making shovel blades the size of a t-spoon? I’ll stick with my old Ortovox Alaska shovel.

  13. See November 12th, 2016 7:44 pm

    Maybe a small shovel is faster for most people in heavy, compacted snow?

  14. Nathan November 13th, 2016 7:40 am

    Hacksaw,

    I know one very fit person who successfully rescued a buried victim last season.

    He immediately bought a shovel with a smaller blade after the rescue. He stated that it was faster and more efficient to keep moving small amounts but his very large “professional grade” shovel was scooping too much snow at once and wearing him out.

    Something to think about.

    I’ve been planning to get this shovel since it was introduced last season. In person, the blade seems to be a great balance between utility and speed.

  15. Lou Dawson 2 November 13th, 2016 7:56 am

    Shovel size is a difficult issue. It’s highly dependent on what type of snow is being shoveled, and the strength of the shoveler. If at all possible, it’s instructive to get your shovel out after you’ve triggered a sluff or small avalanche during ski cutting or other, and shovel the debris pile for a few minutes.

    Most importantly, one must draw a distinction between “companion rescue” and body recovery. SAR work and excavation of long buried unfortunate victims is way different than shoveling someone out who’s in fresh. The former involves chopping and prying set up snow, live rescue involves speed removing large volume of less dense but still somewhat heavy snow, or sometimes very heavy snow if you happen to be involved in “wet” snow conditions.

    Lou

  16. Frame November 13th, 2016 9:01 am

    Aaron, there is a version of the Mammut with hoe and D handle. Weight is higher.

  17. See November 13th, 2016 9:29 am

    I had an Ortovox Pro shovel that could be configured as a hoe. I gave it to a friend before I ever actually took it on a tour, but it seemed pretty nice.

  18. Hacksa November 13th, 2016 9:32 am

    Nathan,
    Interesting. I too have dug out live and dead folks with my “big” shovel blade. I still like the bigger blad. You can do better chopping with it. I have done a lot of digging in my life. You’ll see my name on the BCA strategic shoveling study.
    Cheerios,
    Halsted Morris aka Hacksaw

  19. Jason November 18th, 2016 12:22 pm

    Ask any snowboarder or skier who is out building large jumps about what shovels are holding up. I know when that was my purpose for hanging out in the backcountry (in the mid 90s and early 2000s) I went back to plastic blades since I flattened every single aluminum blade that I used to move big blocks of Cascade Concrete. For my backcountry adventures now I’m back to aluminum shovels again and I agree with Lou that people that are out a lot probably have a quiver of shovels. For riding the sled and avalanche classes I have a heavy BCA shovel/hoe, for lighter touring duty I have an Ortovox something or other, and for lift accessed side country I still carry an old Ortovox plastic blade since it flexes easier when I fall on it. 😀

    For the record, I like scalloped edges.

Got something to say? Please do so.





Anti-Spam Quiz:

You can subscribe to comment notification by checking the box to left, but you must leave a brief comment to do so, which records your email and requires you to use our anti-spam challange. If you don't like leaving substantive comments that's fine, just leave a simple comment that says something like "thanks, subscribed" with a made-up name. Check the comment subscription checkbox BEFORE you submit.
If you need an emoticon for a comment just copy/paste off the following list, or use text code you might be familiar with.

:D    :-)    :(    :lol:    :x    :P    :oops:    :cry:    :evil:    :twisted:    :roll:    :wink:    :!:    :?:    :idea:    :arrow:   
  
Due to comment spam we moderate most comments. Please do not submit your comment twice -- it will appear shortly after approval. Comments with one or more links in the text may be held in moderation, for spam prevention. If you'd like to publish a photo in a comment, contact us. Guidelines: Be civil, no personal attacks, avoid vulgarity and profanity.

  Your Comments

  • Lou Dawson 2: Hi Greg, I did have a graphic at one time but I don't recall it having reso...
  • Greg: I remember there being an image of the D scale at some point – with resort ...
  • Hans D.: Great advice. I hadn't thought about the "quickstep" notch, but now that y...
  • Dean Gagnon: Hello, Does anyone know where to get spare hinges for the tounge of the ...
  • Lou Dawson 2: Billy Goat, IMHO the Amer (Salomon) binding is not a done deal, it will be ...
  • Rod Georgiu: Good idea...
  • zak: Any idea on if/when Scarpa will update the F1 to include the tech from the ...
  • Lou Dawson 2: I'll say it. Many Dynafit ski models are built to be lightweight and not pa...
  • Tomas: Destruction topsheet - only 2 days during normal telemark skiing. I'm wait...
  • Lou Dawson 2: Glad you liked the photos, was a fun day with you guys. Main thing, just gi...
  • Lou Dawson 2: Agree, someone needs to forget about TUV and all that sort of thing and jus...
  • szaraz levente: I do not need a TUV certificate brake, I only hate the wire wich connect me...
  • Lou Dawson 2: Hans, the best thing to do is put your boot-binding combo on a release test...
  • Hans D.: Regarding touring boots with swappable soles for alpine use: I have Lupo TI...
  • Dave Johnson: My mind is blown at the binding technology going on today. Imagine, in '76 ...
  • Bar Barrique: Jason; If you choose to replace the liners, I would advise speaking to the ...
  • BillyGoat: Convertible alpine bindings will defiantly have a market (aside from the fi...
  • Lou Dawson 2: My bad Dan, trying to be brief, I'm talking about the boot locator things, ...
  • Dan: I'm reading wildsnow religiously but I don't know what's the deal with the ...
  • XXX_er: I used to think that I MUST have a cuff cant adj at the outside cuff pivot ...
  • Lou 2: Tom, a canted cuff really helps me as well, sigh.... Probably still somewh...
  • Tom Gos: Lou, thanks for confirming that the new Maestrale will not have cuff cant r...
  • Lou Dawson 2: Dynafit has packs with the same thing, just a compartment on the bottom of ...
  • Rod Georgiu: Can you explain the lower compartments with the flap? Also , have you se...
  • Lou Dawson 2: Sounds like they are incompatible, or perhaps grind off the TR2 metal tabs ...
  • William Häni: Hi, I have a pair of dynafit beast 16. I want to combine them with a pai...
  • Lou Dawson 2: Information I'll add to blog posts about this Salomon brake stopper: It's v...
  • Lou Dawson 2: Nice info Flo, thanks for helping out! Lou...
  • See: Maybe try rebaking (thermo molding) the bad liner?...
  • Flo: Me again, in case, anyone is interested in the purpose of these little plas...

  Recent Posts


Welcome to Louis (Lou) Dawson's backcountry skiing information & opinion website. Lou's passion for the past 50 years has been alpinism, climbing, mountaineering and skiing -- along with all manner of outdoor recreation. He has authored numerous books and articles about ski touring and is well known as the first person to ski down all 54 of Colorado's 14,000-foot peaks, otherwise known as the Fourteeners! Books and free ski touring news and information here.

All material on this website is copyrighted, the name WildSnow is trademarked, permission required for reproduction (electronic or otherwise) and display on other websites. PLEASE SEE OUR COPYRIGHT and TRADEMARK INFORMATION.

Backcountry skiing is dangerous. You may be killed or severely injured if you do any form of ski mountaineering, skimo randonnee and randonnée skiing. The information and news on this website is intended only as general information. While the authors and editors of the information on this website make every effort to present useful information about ski mountaineering, due to human error the information, text and images contained within this website may be inaccurate, false, or out-of-date. By using, reading or viewing the information provided on this website, you agree to absolve the owners of Wild Snow as well as content contributors of any liability for injuries or losses incurred while using such information. Furthermore, you agree to use any of this website's information, maps, photos, or binding mounting instructions templates at your own risk, and waive Wild Snow owners and contributors of liability for use of said items for ski touring or any other use.

Switch To Mobile Version