– The Backcountry Ski Touring Blog
  • Avalanches
  • Gear Reviews
    • Ski Reviews
    • Boot Reviews
    • Binding Reviews
    • Snowboard Splitboard
    • Book Reviews
    • Avalanche Beacon Reviews
    • Airbag Backpacks
    • Backcountry Electronics
    • Misc Gear Reviews
  • Podcast
  • Tips & Tricks
    • Ski Touring Basics
    • Boot Fitting
    • Fitness & Health
    • Gear Mods
  • Trip Reports
    • Fourteeners
    • Huts – Cabins – Lodges
    • Denali McKinley
    • 8,000 Meter Skiing
  • Stories
    • History
    • Humor
    • Land Use Issues
    • Evergreen Ski Touring
    • Poetry
  • Resources
    • All Posts Listed
    • 100 Recent Comments
    • Backcountry Skiing & Ski Touring Webcams
    • Ski Weights Comparison
    • Archives of WildSnow.com
    • Authors Page
    • Ski Touring Bindings
      • Trab TR2 Index and FAQ
      • Salomon Guardian & Tracker
      • Naxo Backcountry Skiing Bindings – Info Index
      • Silvretta Pure Backcountry Skiing Bindings – Info Index
      • Marker F10-12 Duke Baron
      • G3 Onyx Ski Binding FAQ
      • G3 ION Ski Touring Binding
      • Fritschi Backcountry Skiing Bindings – Info Index
      • Fritschi Diamir Frame Bindings Mount DIY
      • Fritschi Diamir Bindings FAQ
      • Fritschi Tecton FAQ
      • Atomic Salomon Backland MTN
      • Dynafit Tri-Step Binding 2001-2003
      • Naxo randonnee alpine touring AT ski binding FAQ
      • Dynafit Skiing Bindings – Info Index
      • Dynafit Binding Frequently Asked Questions FAQ
      • Dynafit Beast 16 FAQ Review 1
      • Dynafit Beast 16 FAQ Page Two
    • History
      • Ski Touring Binding Museum
      • Trooper Traverse Intro & Index
      • Randonnee Ski Touring “AT” ski gear — What is Hip?
      • Chronology
    • Backcountry Skiing Core Glossary
    • Gear Review Policy & Disclosures

– The Backcountry Ski Touring Blog

Banner
  • Avalanches
  • Gear Reviews
    • Ski Reviews
    • Boot Reviews
    • Binding Reviews
    • Snowboard Splitboard
    • Book Reviews
    • Avalanche Beacon Reviews
    • Airbag Backpacks
    • Backcountry Electronics
    • Misc Gear Reviews
  • Podcast
  • Tips & Tricks
    • Ski Touring Basics
    • Boot Fitting
    • Fitness & Health
    • Gear Mods
  • Trip Reports
    • Fourteeners
    • Huts – Cabins – Lodges
    • Denali McKinley
    • 8,000 Meter Skiing
  • Stories
    • History
    • Humor
    • Land Use Issues
    • Evergreen Ski Touring
    • Poetry
  • Resources
    • All Posts Listed
    • 100 Recent Comments
    • Backcountry Skiing & Ski Touring Webcams
    • Ski Weights Comparison
    • Archives of WildSnow.com
    • Authors Page
    • Ski Touring Bindings
      • Trab TR2 Index and FAQ
      • Salomon Guardian & Tracker
      • Naxo Backcountry Skiing Bindings – Info Index
      • Silvretta Pure Backcountry Skiing Bindings – Info Index
      • Marker F10-12 Duke Baron
      • G3 Onyx Ski Binding FAQ
      • G3 ION Ski Touring Binding
      • Fritschi Backcountry Skiing Bindings – Info Index
      • Fritschi Diamir Frame Bindings Mount DIY
      • Fritschi Diamir Bindings FAQ
      • Fritschi Tecton FAQ
      • Atomic Salomon Backland MTN
      • Dynafit Tri-Step Binding 2001-2003
      • Naxo randonnee alpine touring AT ski binding FAQ
      • Dynafit Skiing Bindings – Info Index
      • Dynafit Binding Frequently Asked Questions FAQ
      • Dynafit Beast 16 FAQ Review 1
      • Dynafit Beast 16 FAQ Page Two
    • History
      • Ski Touring Binding Museum
      • Trooper Traverse Intro & Index
      • Randonnee Ski Touring “AT” ski gear — What is Hip?
      • Chronology
    • Backcountry Skiing Core Glossary
    • Gear Review Policy & Disclosures
   

Grilamid Grilamid On The Wall — Who Is The Narrowest TLT Of Them All?

by Lou Dawson November 15, 2013
written by Lou Dawson November 15, 2013

Visually, Dynafit TLT 5 appears wider at metatarsal than TLT6. Some of that might be illusion, or the result of thicker plastic for the metatarsal flex zone of the TLT5. Still, during recent fitting projects I’m finding the TLT6 seems the same or even slightly narrower in the metatarsal, even though I _thought_ someone said it was wider. Time for comparo. I have TLT5 28.5 shells sitting here, Cripple Creek Backountry has TLT6 in the same size, so I headed over there and did some measuring.

When compared side-by-side, TLT5 certainly appears to have the edge in metatarsal width.

When compared side-by-side, TLT5 certainly appears to have the edge in metatarsal width.

When measured from the outside, met dimension of TLT5 is quite larger, but some of this is due to the plastic layering.

When measured from the outside, met dimension of TLT5 is quite larger, but some of this is due to the plastic layering. Nonetheless, TLT5 has a noticeable anatomic shape and a bulge for the mets. Granted, this could be due to the rest of the boot being quite narrower than the metatarsal dimension, but again, our measurements indicate it is actually slightly wider in forefoot width than the TLT6.

Another way of comparing lasts is to measure a molded liner that has assumed the shape of the boot interior.

Another way of comparing last widths is to measure a molded liner that has assumed the shape of the boot interior. In this case, the TLT5 liner is obviously several millimeters wider than the width of the TLT6 which I set the calipers to.

What really told the tale is my handy customized interior boot last measurement tool.

What really told the tale is my handy customized interior boot last measurement tool, OSHA approved of course. I spent quite a bit of time measuring, and kept arriving at 100 mm for TLT5, and 98 for TLT6. That makes sense when considering how the 5 has a visual metatarsal buldge. As for the remainder of the boot, comparing widths is difficult due to need exact data points (comparing widest point is easy). But I can conclude that while TLT6 may be slightly wider in certain areas (as claimed by Dynafit), its width at metatarsal is virtually the same as TLT5. Thus, if you found the TLT5 to be the perfect width, you'll probably have that same experience with TLT 6. Conversely, don't expect the TLT6 to be any wider than TLT5 at the ball of your foot. And overall shell fit comparo? Everything else is similar or identical.

17 comments
0
FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
previous post
Dynafit PDG, A Good Boot for the Grand Teton
next post
Scarpa Freedom SL First Look

17 comments

jonah November 15, 2013 - 9:07 am

at least punching out the shell in the metatarsal zone will be easier on the 6.
i have the 5, and dealing with all the extra plastic was a bit challenging. thank you for the update.

Lou Dawson November 15, 2013 - 9:57 am

Johah, indeed, punching the 5 is really easy. I’ve done both my left and right. Only trick is you can end up distorting the shell to the point where it won’t align in your tech bindings. Prevention of that involves affixing boot in some sort of rigid jig system while punching. So it’s tougher than you’d think, but the Grilamid is amazing easy to work on. Lou

Jim November 15, 2013 - 10:20 am

I yearn for the day when boot manufacturers publish standard last width measurements just as they do other specs, such as BSL. It would make boot shopping so much easier for narrow flipper-footed types such as myself. I imagine folks with feet on the other side of the width bell curve feel the same way.

Still, thanks for this article. I’m reasonably happy with the relative (lack of width) of my Scarpa Maestrale RS’s, but it’s good to know that the TLT6 hasn’t grown too much compared to its predecessor. Now, if I could just find a narrow lightweight skimo boot in my size (30.0) …

Juergen November 15, 2013 - 1:50 pm

As I learned from prior TLT 6 posts, the liner became beefier for the sake of better insulation compared to TLT 5. The beefier liner in addition with 2mm less max TLT 6 width (100 – 98) will lead to a felt 4-5mm+ as in my case. I call it significantly narrower. My alpine boots are standard Salomon X Pro as comparison.

Stewart November 15, 2013 - 3:39 pm

When I’d previously shop tested the TLT5, I was impressed with the ankle hold, certainly the best fit yet for my low volume foot, but needed a little more substance and durability. With high hopes I recently tried on the TLT6, but was disappointed to find significantly more volume around the ankle. Even the Vulcan felt lower volume to me.

Barrows November 15, 2013 - 8:03 pm

I am a little disappointed in the width of the 6. I have 5s and 6s, both in 28 shell. The 5s just barely worked for me in width at the sixth toe area. To check the width of the 6s I tried them on with the liner (Intuition) which I and molded for my 5s. Turns out the 6s are a little narrower in that area, and I am going to have to have them punched. Otherwise I find there is a little increased volume over the instep, which should help the warmth a bit. But after all Dynafit’s claims about the 6 being slightly wider than the 5, I am a little confused.

Tyler November 17, 2013 - 7:35 pm

Jim,

Speaking for the wide footed folks, I am inclined to agree. However, we all need to remember that the forefoot measurement provided by manufacturers is for only (1) shell size – usually a 26 or 27- and gets proportionally bigger or smaller as you go up or down.

Another thing to keep in mind is that forefoot width is only (1) dimension in (1) location. Personally my 5th metatarsals go straight, where most boots curve inward, my instep is very high, etc.

There will never be a substitute for trying on boots and talking to an experienced boot fitter.

Charlie November 18, 2013 - 11:17 am

I don’t know if OSHA would have approved of however you chose to fabricate your boot-measuring tool, but I’m pretty sure that quite a few folks at NIST would. If you can’t measure it, you make a tool that can…

Were you able to try out your measurements on a few pairs of boots? I can imagine that there might be some variation from boot to boot.

Skian November 19, 2013 - 11:11 am

When the 5 came out the heel cup retention was amazing for a low volume heel. But with a low volume heel and wide forefoot the challenge became not punching the boot, but the boot holding the the punch.

For this as Lou stated the thin boot sole could shift adjusting the alignment of the boot. I always recommended to boot fitters having the boot mounted in the bindings. Feddie told me once that a water bath heated the boot move evenly, so I first water bathed the boot and took a temp reading. Then mounted the boot in the binding on a ski or jig. Then before punching heated the forefoot with a gun to increase the pliability of the Grilamid.

Grilamid has a much stronger memory than Pebax so in order to get my desired width i pushed 1 or 2 mill wider than needed. Take it slow and heat a broad area. I also recommend this being your last punch of the day and let it sit over night to slow set.

Ive had good results with this method. Great assessment of the 6. Would love to see this kind of detail review of actual metatarsal widths (inside) of other boots also taking into consideration the width of the liner and density of the liner material. If you measure the width of the foot your optimal width should be one that includes your liner thickness. Otherwise the metatarsals become cramped into an upside down U affecting flexion of the foot in walk mode.

great review and blog post!

Lou Dawson November 19, 2013 - 11:15 am

Thanks Skian, we’ll keep on charging ahead. Lou

Fede November 20, 2013 - 10:52 am

Lou measuing the width of a boot like you did means nothing, our fit are 3Dimensional so the whole volume/circumference count… that’s why I personally always fighted in giving with measures of shells in my previouse life…

Moreover TLT5 were not tight on the metatarsal, they were tight only for people with massive abnormal wide feet. The vast majority of TLT5 cusmers, which are not located in north america, are happy with the width.
TLT5 was tight on the mid foot and heel for most and creating pain and bad blood circulation for the majority of people… and thats where the TLT6 got wider. Not on the metatarsal.
I jsut got my new TLT6, and can assure the fit is quite romier there.

One additional thing I tried to explain several times! if you put inside a shell designed to be used with a liner with 7mm foam a intuition liner which has 10-11mm foam then you should not complain about the booots beeing tight. Even if you thermoform them they will still fit MUCH narrower compared with the original liner.
To use an intuition liner you should over size the shell!…. which I kow doesn’t work for you as you have a VERY special feet my friend!!!
Huge metatarsal, ultra narrow heel, ultra narrow lower leg.. so hardly you will ever find a boot which fits you 😉

Ah lou, on this fit comments you always do refering to Montebelluna gnomes or fit of somebody living in tiny italian village 3 generations ago you should quit… somebody might get offended as without those “montebelluna gnomes” you would probably still Telemark in leather boots today instead of enjoying pimping TLT and co, boots!. 😉

Skian November 20, 2013 - 11:07 am

From the dungeons of Annecy he awakens…. only with a French accent’…

Harpo November 29, 2013 - 4:07 pm

In addition to agreeing with Lou comments about the width of the 6, I am also finding it has less height over the forefoot and toes. So even having punched for width, I think I will be unable to use my 5 liner in the 6 and will have to cook a new liner.

trollanski January 16, 2014 - 9:16 pm

Having fit boots for only three seasons, its amazing how often I deal with people’s perception of a boots as if they are a final product carved out of stone. Having a D width foot and some sizable 1st met heads and ankles, I don’t expect boots to fit right out of the box. The beauty of wonderous plastic is how easy it is to modify to whatever special needs one might have. I would suggest that people keep this in mind, and cease with the ‘disappointment’ over a last which is narrow, or a heel which is too wide. Punch, grind, glue some foam out back, go ski….Simple!
Oh, and I think I will Bake the liner after some work, so it is remains thicker and insulates better, as I am often jumping out of the car at 0 degrees. Cheers!

AndyC February 5, 2014 - 9:11 pm

FWIW, I have worn MP29 in Zzero3, Zero4, Zzeus, and TLT5. The 5 I felt very snug–took a week or more to break in and 100 days before I could add a SOLE orthotic. However, in the the TLT6, I could use my custom (Jim Mates) orthotics from the get-go; the increased volume was very noticeable to me. YMMV. Maybe it has to do with being a 29 in a shell that is 29-30 vs being a 29.5 and feelilng little increase volume. The new liner broke into being nicely comfortable (with the footbeds) in 2 days. Also the top buckles had much more room than the TLT5 and the lower buckle was extremely nice with its micro-adjustability.

Mark Worley December 1, 2014 - 9:55 pm

Toured TLT 6 with laces for first time. Appears this might reduce hot spots for my heels. Should have tried this sooner!

Cal E April 22, 2016 - 4:38 pm

I agree with the last on these TLT6’s being tight, and I’ve always been told I have narrow feet! Probably getting mine punched tomorrow.

Re. laces, I use them just to keep the tongue in place when removing the boots or putting them back on. I have the laces knotted in a loose position, and just leave them there.

Comments are closed.

Recent Comments

  • phillip gallagher on Envisioning a Friendly, Busier Backcountry — Shaun Deutschlander Q&A
  • WNDR Alpine on Versatile and Sustainable — WNDR Vital 100 Ski Review
  • Poppa G on Giving Myself the Gift of Backcountry
  • Idaho Dawg on Envisioning a Friendly, Busier Backcountry — Shaun Deutschlander Q&A
  • Shane on Envisioning a Friendly, Busier Backcountry — Shaun Deutschlander Q&A

Gear Reviews

  • Meidjo 3.0 Binding Review – Backcountry Telemark Evolves

    January 12, 2021
  • Tele Tech First Look — Voile Ultra Vector BC, 22 Designs Lynx, Scarpa TX Pro

    January 5, 2021
  • Petzl Irvis Hybrid Crampon Review

    January 4, 2021

Trip Reports

  • Finding Early Turns on Rainier’s Muir Snowfield

    November 14, 2020
  • Treading Lightly Through Close-to-Home Mountains

    October 6, 2020
  • Snoqualmie Classic — Chair Peak Circumnavigation

    May 26, 2020

Totally Deep Podcast

  • Risky Business — Zahan Billimoria on Solving for Z

    December 14, 2020
  • Totally Deep Podcast 81 — CAIC Director Ethan Greene

    December 9, 2020
  • Unraveling the Mysteries of Avalanche Education — Totally Deep Podcast 80

    November 16, 2020

Tips & Tricks

  • 10 Essential Mistakes for the Backcountry Ski Touring Beginner

    December 2, 2020
  • Buying Used Gear Guide Part II — Poles, Avy Gear, Packs

    November 25, 2020
  • Save Your Ski Day — Emergency Car Kit Essentials

    November 24, 2020

Ski Touring Stories

  • Giving Myself the Gift of Backcountry

    January 15, 2021
  • Six Who Dared — Elk Mountains Traverse & Richard Compton Tribute

    January 7, 2021
  • Risky Business — Zahan Billimoria on Solving for Z

    December 14, 2020

Newsletter Sign-Up

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • About Lou Dawson
  • Authors Page
  • About
  • Contact
  • Copyright & Legal
  • Website Security

@2020 - All Rights Reserved. Designed and Developed by WildSnow


Back To Top

Read alsox

Envisioning a Friendly, Busier Backcountry —...

January 18, 2021

Euro Puro Amoro — La Sportiva...

January 13, 2021

Griffin Post Stays Home — Totally...

January 10, 2021