|
February 28 - 2005
Backcountry Skiing Book List a Work in Progress
We've been improving our backcountry skiing
book list here at WildSnow.com, it now has more than 100 books, most
with easy shopping links for Amazon. Take
a look. If you have any suggestions for backcountry skiing books
that aren't on the list, please email me or leave a message at the
Forums (see menu to left).
Avalanche accidents: You're driving
up the highway for a day of backcountry skiing. You slam on your
brakes and swerve to avoid an avalanche pouring off a cliff up ahead.
You notice a flash of something human in the plunging snow. Sure
enough, a snowboarder has crashed down on the road in tons of
churning powder. Along with dozens of other motorists, you rush to
the pile of debris and begin a roadside avalanche rescue. Don't laugh
-- it happened
a few days ago.
More on the avalanche safety front: A
recent backcountry skiing avalanche fatality in the Tahoe area has
been honestly
reported by a party
member. Turns out their beacon search took quite a while, possibly
because inexperienced or mentally compromised party members left
their beacons transmitting and thus confused the search. This should
pound home the point that beacons are a LAST RESORT and EVERY person
in your group should have extensive practice doing beacon rescue.
By practice, I mean doing dummy rescue scenes that include the
human factor -- not just playing around with "find the beacon"
out in someone's back yard.
More, this accident was yet another
that involved more than one person caught at a time. Unless it
is absolutely necessary, we need to keep our groups spread out,
and expose only one person at a time to even moderate avy hazard.
Following this one practice would make a HUGE difference in many
of the fatal backcountry skiing avalanche accidents over the past
years.
And since I'm on a safety tear, I should mention
our ski day yesterday at Snowmass Resort in Colorado. We headed up
there to practice on their steep terrain. We
checked slope angles with an inclinometer and managed to enjoy some
solid 45 degree terrain, and a few turns up in the 50s. The idea
was practice for spring chute skiing here in Colorado. While riding
the lifts, I witnessed a near-miss when a snowboarder caught air
above a skier. More, a friend of ours recently ended up in the hospital
after being hit by someone coming from above. I can't believe how
frequently I see such lunacy on the slopes. A recent
accident in Jackson drives home my point. This tragic junk needs
to stop.
Our ski resorts can control the level of idiocy
and still allow skiers and riders to get radical. Slope safety folks
should simply pull passes when they see people behaving in ways that
put others at risk.
Sounds easy? For some reason, prevention of homicidal
skiing and riding is being done at only minimal levels.
Perhaps the ski areas are afraid of scaring off their financial saviors
(young snowboarders?), or perhaps the "extreme" ethos is so important
to the resorts, they're willing to sacrifice a few innocent customers
on the alter of their "extreme" image.
Whatever the case, for those of us who love skiing,
and regard it as a sport one can pursue for a lifetime, it appears
tragic to let uncaring maniacs become human cannon balls that the
rest of us have to constantly guard for. Please... MAKE IT
STOP! My neck hurts from looking over my shoulder!
February 26 - 2005
Ski Areas Now More Exciting -- But More Dangerous?
We're up here a Buttermilk Ski Area near
Aspen today, doing volunteer work with ski club. Brought the laptop
for an afternoon blogbreak and found an open network connection in
the base area. Skiing is super today -- a good load of fresh atop
a bunch of groom. Testing a Dynafit rig -- skis well as they seem
to always do.
The trend of ski resorts to provide more "adventure,"
assisted by laws that limit liability exposure, has been interesting
to watch over the past decades. I believe it's been a good
thing. But taking the long view, I've noticed that you really have
to watch out where you go at some resorts where cliffs and worse
lurk on named runs. More, disturbing stories of children
getting lost and such
seem to crop up with more regularity than before.
Perhaps it's my imagination,
but it seems that in the 14 years of raising our child, I've spent
an awful lot of time trying to figure out how to make sure he doesn't
accidentally venture out of bounds when he's skiing by himself. Yes,
the boundaries are marked, but plenty of places have unobvious ropes,
with tracks leading off to slides and kickers in backcountry woods
that are beyond patrol sweep. More, plenty of area boundaries around
here are regularly crossed by non-backcountry skiers - many have
become de-facto ski runs, only they are not swept at the end of the
day as the in-bounds runs are. Parents beware.
Hunter Thompson watch: I've been
interested to see if the worship would tone
down and realism set in. Michael Connif, a self proclaimed liberal
columnist and radio host here in the Aspen area, frequently comes
up with well-thought views. Check
out his take.
And on a lighter note, check
out this column about
fist fights on the slopes, by Roger Marolt, one of my favorite local
writers. Man oh man... I guess ski areas can be kinda dangerous...but
not because of cliffs...better go backcountry skiing or bring your
brass knuckles if you decide to "hit" the resort!
February 25 - 2005
Improved Silvretta Pure - Backcountry
Binding - Looks Good
Garmont was kind enough to recently send
us the new 04/05 model of the Silvretta Pure lightweight plate backcountry
skiing binding. We've always had high hopes for this grabber, as
it's light enough to be a replacement for Dynafit backcountry
skiing bindings if you don't care to shop for boots based on whether
or not they have Dynafit fittings.
 |
| 03/04 model Sivretta Pure. New model looks almost the same.
Shop used market with care. |
Last year's Pure had a few durability problems,
this year's Pure is beefed and we'll be testing it extensively.
Strengthened areas include the toe jaw (see photos below), and
the heel jaw post. Weight is 22.3 ounces (632 grams) per binding
(with screws, without brakes). As comparison, Dynafit Comfort weighs
14.3 ounces per binding (with screws, without brakes).
 |
 |
| Original model Pure, showing meager beef
in toe area. Click image to enlarge. |
04/05 model Pure, toe unit is strengthened
in several places. Click image to enlarge. |
There are actually three models of Pure that'll
be imported next season. The Pure X-Mountain will weigh slightly
more but is value priced. The Pure Freeride is beefed, is higher
off the ski, and dials to DIN 12. We'll be testing those models as
well. All may be excellent for backcountry skiing.
February 24 - 2005
French Ski Area Knows How To Serve It Up
Despite their selective amnesia about things
such as military
tactics, you have to give the French props for remembering how
to enjoy their skiing. I'd like to visit this
place! It sounds like they know how to design a resort.
What's that have to do with backcountry skiing?
Well, it reminds me that Chamonix, France is still there. It's no
secret that Chamonix is still THE ski alpinism epicenter. Check out this
website to get started on a virtual tour.
Moving in a Teutonic
direction, I got a kick out of the article about St. Anton (another
center for ski alpinism). It's politically incorrect to talk about,
but the fact is that adventuresome alpine sports such as climbing
and backcountry skiing are dominated by men. As a result, St.
Anton life has become somewhat interesting. Check out this excerpt
from the Times newspaper of London:
Gonzo journalism department: You
probably heard that famed writer and self proclaimed weirdo Hunter
Thompson shot himself a few days ago in his home near here. The local
press frenzy has been incredible -- totally over the top in a kind
of perverse hero worship that's truly "weird."
In honor of Hunter,
here is a gonzo take of my own: Trying to base your life on being
as weird and drug addled as possible, as Hunter did, always seemed
to me like a loosing proposition. Kind of sad, in a way. I guess
Hunter proved that out when he ate a .45 caliber pistol with his
6-year-old grandson nearby, and his wife on the phone listening
to the click of the gun and a "loud muffled noise"! Sick. According
to reports, Thompson's last wish is to have his ashes fired from
a cannon. I wonder if that seems important to him now?
Check out what one of our local pundits writes
about Hunter.
February 23 - 2005
Yes Virginia -- you CAN switch Dynafit modes on the fly
One of the
few problems with Dynafit bindings has been the difficulty of
switching from latched to free heel. Most users remove their bindings,
then re-enter in tour mode. Others are able to rotate the heel
unit enough with their ski pole tip to "pop" their boot
heel up into tour mode. Perhaps the best method yet is popular
with Andrew McLean and other backcountry skiing mountaineers, and
uses the ski pole grip as a lever to do a tricky maneuver that
releases your heel. Andrew shares the trick in this excellent
video clip.
There is some question about doing this trick
with Dynafit brakes installed. It may (sort of) work, but as you
rotate that heel into the touring mode the brake has to retract under
the force of the rotation -- and it may take considerable force to
do this (especially if there is snow under the brake actuator plate).
This force, along with the upward pressure of the brake and your
your boot, will cause more wear on the thimble bushing (see
FAQ) inside
the binding, and if too much force is required something may give
(as in "breakage"). Normally, when you change Dynafits to touring
mode from alpine mode, you should retract the brake with your hand
before rotating the heel unit, thus allowing the heel unit to rotate
freely. Thus, take care using this trick if you have brakes installed.
Google Provides Avalanche Safety Insights
Mainstream
media appears obsessed with using the terms "experienced"or "expert" for
nearly anyone caught in a backcountry avalanche. Google "experienced
skier" avalanche and you'll
get about 400 results, as opposed to about 30 results for "inexperienced
skier."
Perhaps the media's "experienced skier" verbiage
panders to the booty quaking fear we should
ostensibly feel when encountering the world outside a newsroom
office (especially in places with trees instead of asphalt). But
there is something to be learned.
Fact is, many avalanche victims ARE excellent
backcountry skiers and riders, and they frequently have many days
of backcountry experience. NO DOUBT most of the reason "experienced" folk
are more likely to be avalanched is they're spending more days out
-- but what a sad commentary that is on all our expertise and avalanche
education.
In other words, we spend thousands of hours learning
and practicing, and somehow it is not helping many of us. My opinion:
it boils down to risk taking. I go out all the time with experienced
backcountry skiers, and frequently observe them taking easily avoidable
risks (gang skiing, sloppy route finding), along with ratcheting
up their overall level of acceptable risk (hucking off a cornice
into an unskied powder filled chute, and things like that).
If you look in the mirror and see an experienced
backcountry skier, it might be time to assess your backcountry style,
and do some thinking about your level of acceptable risk.
If you're one of the rare "inexperienced," you
might ponder the fact that the more you know, the more likely you
are to get injured or killed.
Can we reverse this trend? Perhaps we need a major
paradigm shift in avalanche education. More, perhaps our backcountry
skiing culture needs a subtle shift from the rabid cliff-hucking
powder lust ethos that's developed over the past two decades.
And least we take this too lightly, Google keywords
"skier
avalanche" and watch a virtual avalanche of 98,000 results.
February 22 - 2005
Colorado Enjoying Excellent Snow Year
 |
Powder was had this past weekend. |
We
returned last night from a 3-day backcountry skiing cabin trip
in the area between here and Crested Butte. Snowpack depth in this
region (one of Colorado's "high snow micro climes"),
is averaging about six feet (in sub-alpine zone below timberline).
Our snow is building fast now that winter's wettest months are
upon us. Should be plenty of terrific March and April powder backcountry
skiing, along with the May/June spring snow season we long for
every year. Photo story below, click images to enlarge.
Our mission this trip: Two
men, with 60+ years combined experience in avalanche safety, mentoring
four strong and committed teenage skiers with their lives ahead
of them. We began each day with weather radio and a group consensus
on hazard level, then proceeded to group assessment, then set group
goals based on hazard. The boys rated avy danger on this trip as
Considerable/Extreme. Goals: Remember beacons are for finding
dead people. With that in mind, find 100% avalanche safe powder
then rip it. Aspen glades provided the key. Three days of avalanche
safe backcountry powder skiing was the result.
Law of unintended consequences: Some
years ago, environmentalists pushed for creation of small
pocket wilderness areas in the Utah Wasatch mountains. Such legal
wilderness is frequently too far from road access for much human-powered
winter recreation such as backcountry skiing. It's also illegal
to use with machinery. Result: helicopter skiers and human powered
backcountry skiers are forced
together in more accessible areas of the Wasatch. Creating
legal wilderness is a harsh way to protect our backcountry, and
may even result in over-use of other land, thus destroying as
much "wilderness value" as it creates. Perhaps we need
another land designation that allows limited mechanized access
but still protects the land from overzealous development?
February 18 - 2005
Dawson makes Backcountry Skiing Career
Breakthrough?
I'm now a Polo Ralph Lauren model (be glad: hats, not underwear).
Check out this article on the Polo
Website. The writer of the article contacted
me for a brief interview, then asked if I had any photos. In a
moment of weakness I assumed they would use one of my online mug
shots to illustrate my quotes in the article. Instead, I visit
the site and I'm suddenly an un-named Polo lifestyle model! Move
over Marky Mark, it's now Louie Lou!
Polo's publishing the photos without
caption or credit to the photographers is a huge bummer I'm trying
to rectify -- but it's like trying to fix something at city hall.
FYI, writer/photographer Brian Litz took the photo with the green
hat (Polo - not), and Couloir Magazine publisher Craig Dostie took
the black&white shot. As always, I hope an article such as this
is good for the sport of backcountry skiing, but I doubt it. I
think it's more about Polo filling their kitchen-sink website up
with fluffy suds. We'll see if I can at least get Brian and Dostie's
names on their photos. Gad, the least they could of done is hot
linked to here -- or sent cowboy hats to Litz and Dostie!
Backcountry skiing blog schedule: I'll be out
of the office for a 3-day weekend and may experience powder turns
during that time. Look for a report Tuesday.
February 17 - 2005
Aspen Real Estate -- Shameful Fantasy or Incredible Reality?
One of my most embarrassing fantasies is
to live in Aspen again, at the base of Aspen Mountain, like I did
for a period in the 1970s.
This
condo is about 200 yards from the former location of the old
Durant Mine Barn ski bum haven, and actually ON the ski slope.
Eat your heart out.
No, WildSnow has NOT been doing THAT
well -- just kidding -- but keep visiting here, perhaps We'll
move to Aspen yet (smile).
Avalanche education: Getting
geared up again to help a group of backcountry skiing teenagers
learn to survive. Those of us with decades of route finding experience
can take a lot of things for granted. For example, we generally
know how far to skirt the base of an avalanche path so a natural
release doesn't kill us. Kids may not have a sense of that. We're
teaching them to read terrain features, but also to use an inclinometer
to catch the "alpha angle" of a slope, and thus determine where
it could run. Alpha angle is just a fancy way of saying "average
angle," and is figured from the top of the slope to any arbitrary
point at the bottom. To figure your safe zone, you do a rough
measurement with an inclinometer, and figure out where at bottom
of the path you can measure from and get an alpha angle of about
23 degrees or less -- and that's as close to the monster as you
want to get (unless the only route forces you closer -- then it's
decision time...).
Several of this year's backcountry avalanche accidents
involved people being hit while below paths, perhaps a better sense
of "alpha angle" would have saved them.
Randonnee bindings department: Just
got off the phone with Garmont. They're distributing 3 (yes
THREE) models of the Silvretta Pure binding for next season. We're
reviewing all of them (whew) for Couloir, but interesting rig is
still the lighter weight "standard" Pure, which has been strengthened.
While slightly heavier than Dynafit, Pure is possibly a viable
lightweight alternative for backcountry skiers who don't want to
niggle with Dynafit's quirks. More soon. Silvretta website here.
previous
backcountry skiing blog weblog
|