| December
21 - 30, 2004 (current backcountry skiing
weblog)
December 30 - 2004
I've always loved mohair climbing skins for
backcountry skiing -- the ones made with real goat hair. They're
light weight and glide almost as well as a bad nordic wax job. Not
as durable as nylon, but they have their place on long flat trips
or times where efficiency and speed are primary motives, such as fitness
uphilling at the ski
area, or doing low angled approaches.
We have quite a bit of mohair skin material around
here. It's all 60 mm wide, so it's too narrow for today's fatter
skis. (As many know, a skin that leaves too much base exposed on
the sides will tend to slip back when the going gets steep.) I've
split a few skins to make "skinny skins" that work really
well on flat trails, but with recent interest in speedy uphilling,
we started looking at wider mohair. Somewhere I'd heard you could
split skins in half, so they can be attached outboard on the base,
closer to the edges. So we split a couple pair of our 60mm mohair
skins and they work amazingly well. Very light weight, climb good
-- only downside is they're slightly harder to handle when removing.
Interesting stuff, at least during winter!
December 29 - 2004
A mystery of athletics is how much you should do if
you have a cold (the season is here). Hamish
Gowans' winter fourteener climbing project was cut short last year because of illness --
that gets me thinking.
Can you backcountry ski while sick?
I've learned over the years that most people should avoid
long days of alpine sports while ill, or they'll just get worse.
But how about keeping some workouts going so you don't loose fitness?
Good wisdom is to use the "neck check." If all of your
symptoms are above the neck (nose, scratchy throat, etc), you can
do a workout at about half speed. But it's risky. If you don't
keep your intensity level down, you risk compromising your immune
system and any illness you have may take a turn for the worse.
Perhaps the wisest choice for backcountry skiers with colds is
to skip a day or two of workouts, and if symptoms stay above the
neck, do workouts that force a lower intensity, such as walking
or lift served
skiing. Now you know
where I was going with this!
Another thing we've learned around here is that
cold and flue prevention make for a MUCH nicer winter. We go for
all the vaccinations we can get, and use hand sanitizer throughout
the day if we're in public (keep a bottle in your car, and a small
one in your pocket). We try hard to get enough sleep every night,
stay hydrated, and stay on a good diet. Our program works -- colds
and flue are infrequent annoyances here at the family compound.
December 28 - 2004
Penn from Backbone
Media brought
over a nice sampling of Cloudveil gear we'll be using for our next
cycle of Couloir Magazine clothing reviews. One incredibly nice piece
is the Icefloe
softshell. My son snapped
it up for his trip today to Highland Bowl. Another nice item in
the goodie box was a woman's Wister
Jacket -- the perfect light
insulating layer for those fit and fast days when you are feeling
GOOD!
Penn and his wife are super athletes -- fast uphillers
and terrific skiers. I was always wondering when they'd convert to
Scarpa F1 boots
and Dynafit bindings for races and super-fast ascents. I'm wondering
no more. Look out world.
More gear notes: I just got off
the phone with Aspen powder guide Bob Perlmutter. He's been on a
twenty year quest for one-rig Randonnée boots, and thinks he might
have found something close in the Garmont Adrenaline. After dealing
with some fit issues, his tip is to consider swapping out the liners
if you have any problems. He ended up with Raichle thermo liners
(the ones with the thick overlap in front of your shin)-- but recommends
giving the stock liners some time before you cut bait.
December 27 - 2004
Got another update from Hamish Gowans, the
fellow attempting all the Colorado fourteeners in one winter. Looks
like he's on a tear, so I created a special
page for his project log. Need to get some photos from him,
but don't hold your breath -- he's too busy climbing! He's going
solo, but perhaps we can sneak up on him and get a shot!
Gear department: It's been interesting to
watch the development of Randonnée bindings these past few
years. My recent binding review in Couloir Magazine brushes the
surface -- I can be a bit more frank on my own website, so here
goes: One would think that since the departure from cable bindings
about 30 years ago, we'd have bindings as engineered as, say, an
iPod. Bindings such as the Dynafit really
are backcountry skiing marvels (and almost as small as an iPod),
and most people figure out how to get many excellent days out of
their randonnee bindings -- especially compared to the endless
breakage history of telemark bindings.
Nonetheless, considering
the cost of randonnee bindings and the resources that have gone
into improving the things, they've long been in a state of development
that could best be termed "retarded." Over the last decades most
rando bindings released for retail sale that still had durability
and function issues. Most of those problems have been fixed (or
users developed work-arounds), but who knows what lurks on the
horizon? No company is immune.
I remember when the first Fritschi
Diamirs came to me for testing a number of years ago. On the
workbench, I snapped in a boot and the heel unit exploded into
high velocity shards. An improved heel was quickly designed and
released to the public, but not before a number of people had this
somewhat shattering experience (lesson: wear eye protection when
testing bindings). Then there was the Dynafit Tristep debacle a
few years ago. Renowned for their engineering savvy, the Dynafit
boys released a binding that worked fine in alpine mode, but you'd
walk out of it in one or two steps while touring. A fix was soon
issued, but it never worked 100% and the binding was discontinued.
And who can forget the Silvretta SL, which would explode into small
parts if you took a forward fall while touring? You needed the
skills of a Swiss watch maker to put 'em together again -- if you
could find the parts. And on and on.
Google amusement department: Okay,
many of you know I've bashed telemark bindings over the years because
of durability problems that don't seem to go away. It appears things
have gotten better in that area. Shoot, it's been at least a season
since I was skiing with someone who's telemark binding broke during
a tour. Perhaps that's why we now have a telemark boom? Or do we?
Some of you might remember a while back when we
Googled the term "telemark
mecca" and got a ton of hits (still amusing, check
it out).
Seems like every ski area in the country is or was soon to be a
mecca of telemark.
On similar subject, I recently noticed yet another
article about the "telemark boom." I've been around for a while,
and seem to remember a "telemark boom" that was being touted back
in the 1970s. If that's true, it makes this one of the longest running
booms in boom history, and means that nearly everyone on the ski
slopes should be on telemark gear. More likely, a bunch of writers
out there like telemarking, and they're constantly trying to whip
up enthusiasm by calling it a "boom" -- or at least trying to feel
hip about being 50-something and still struggling in difficult snow
on their tele gear, while randonnee and snowboard glissers crank
circles around them. Okay, boom boom -- whatever. Let's Google it!
Linkin claims the boom "arrived
in the middle of the eighties." Then we have the "modern
boom in Tele skiing" described at Active.com. I was amused
by the capitalizing of the word "Tele." I guess if it's
a boom, then it should be capitalized! Then there is Warmpeace,
which seems to imply the style was "newborn" in the 1970s-1980s
(lengthy labor, did it need a caesarian?), and that the boom
began with plastic telemark boots. So that puts their boom start-date
at around 1992, when Scarpa released the cinder-block like Terminator
plastic tele boot. And more. In all, it seems the telemark boom
has been happening for at least a decade; longer in some folk's
estimation. So, is this the longest running "boom" in
history? Perhaps. Bottom line: If we have as many telemark meccas
as it appears we do, we need a twenty year "boom" to
fill them up with pilgrims.
December 26 - 2004
The Denver Post has published an excellent
article about Colorado's
"lost resorts," many of which have become backcountry
ski destinations. Much of the backcountry skiing in the north eastern
U.S. is also done at former ski resorts (where the trails remain,
but the commercial operation shut down long ago).
I'm always amused
by this, as most such "lost" resorts were created
by cutting down a bunch of trees, and some skiers even maintain
the lost resorts by cutting brush and the occasional sapling
that threatens to block their favorite line. Yep, logging can
have excellent results, such as ski runs, houses, and paper.
Vintage Ski World sells a popular
poster that depicts Colorado's
lost resorts. As for logging, remember, if God had not driven
mankind from the Garden of Eden, the Sierra Club would have.
Sometimes cutting down some trees has its uses.
Gear notes: We
continue to get a ton of traffic on our Laser
Boot Tongue Mod article, after how many years? Word is we've
even created somewhat of a mini market in Flexon tongues. I get
numerous emails about this mod. Recently, our web visitors have
noticed we're messing around with the excellent Garmont
Mega Ride. People are asking if the Flexon tongue will work
with the Garmont, and if so, will it improve the "ride?" It
will, (with a bit of cutting and grinding to fit the tongue). But
do you really need it?
In my opinion, as skis improve it's less and
less important to have a boot that's super stiff in forward flex
(the primary purpose of adding a stiffer tongue). Use shorter, modern
skis with lost of sidecut, and it's amazing how quick and powerful
you can turn without heavily pressuring the front of your boots.
Nonetheless, larger aggressive skiers may find most AT boots
are too gushy, and adding things such as stiffer tongues, extra power
straps, etc., can vastly improve a boot without adding much weight.
Hamish Gowans update: Hamish
is attempting a fourteener grand slam this winter by climbing all
the Colorado 14,000-foot peaks in one winter season (he's using skis
and backcountry skiing, but not trying to do ski descents unless
they fit in with the climb). He got started Dec. 22, and sent this
message on the 23rd via email:
"Successful on Longs yesterday, but frostnipped, tender toes.
Figure I'll stay off the peaks until this cold snap eases, should
be Thu/Fri. Conditions on Longs similar to Pikes and Bierstadt. Almost
blown clear. Only snow remaining is there because the wind has compacted
it into Colorado Concrete. Best, Hamish"
December 25 - 2004
Merry
Christmas everyone! It's a sunny day here in Colorado. We're off
to do some uphilling, with a couple of new heart rate monitors (HRMs)
to try and get that perfect aerobic training so we can really get
strong for our dream Wasatch backcountry skiing trip in January!
Hint, you can get a reasonably priced Polar heart rate monitor at
Walmart -- highly recommended if you feel like your fitness level
has plateaued out, or you want to build super fitness without injuring
yourself. Most people train at too high a heart rate -- my experience
is that sticking to your target
rate can result in significant improvement. An HRM really helps
with this.
My favorite Christmas gift? The family knows I
like anything with skiing on the cover, so somehow they found this
old movie I'd never heard of. Campy fun stuff. Ski troops attack!
The scene where a soldier hurls his ski pole like a javelin at an
enemy is priceless. Highly un-recommended <grin>!
December 24 - 2004
Got our latest issue of Couloir
Magazine -- as always it's a stunning tribute to
all we love about backcountry skiing, from deep powder to cool
gear. My yearly Randonnée binding review is in this issue. It
is somewhat brief, but I tried to give a good overview of the choices
and attempted to be a bit more hard hitting than last year (as
requested by readers), and will continue to provide extensive details
here and at the Couloir
website.
Thanks goes out to all who emailed me about
AT bindings over the past year, and thanks especially for Bob Perlmutter's
feedback on the Silvretta Pure.
But the big excitement for us was the Editor's
Picks clothing reviews in Couloir. Instead of myself, my 14-year-old
son Louie did the review. He turned out a clever and useful
piece. We worked a Kris Holm unicycle
into the article (trust me, it's backcountry skiing related). Other
featured brands are Marmot, North Face, Thorlo, and Granite Gear
-- and of course Dynafit. Check it out at your local outdoor shop.
On to politics: National Forest officials
in Wyoming just affirmed a controversial
decision to allow the
Jackson Hole Mountain Resort to continue guiding clients on Teton
Pass, with increased use numbers. Many local
backcountry skiers are opposed to the decision. They feel
it's a "foot in the door" deal wherein
the ski resort could continue increasing its use level, and thus
crowd out the locals. Seems like a question of balance to me, since
increased guiding will also employ more locals -- and continue the
evolution of Jackson as the "American Chamonix." I mean, what ensures
the perpetuation of mountain culture and alpinism more than a viable
guiding economy? My prediction is that the locals will learn to work
with the increased guiding, and it'll become part of Jackson's amazing
alpine ethos -- and perhaps they'll build more and better parking
on the pass.
December 23 - 2004
I've been having an interesting email conversation
with ski historian and prolific ski writer John
Fry. In question is when the first "ski train" in
North America happened. I define "ski train" as a train
used by an organized group of skiers, such as those from a club.
The train could be a regular run, or chartered. With that definition,
it appears that the first ski train was in Utah. It took a group
of Wasatch Mountain Club skiers to Parley's summit in winter of
1924-25. I got this info out of Alexis Kelner's history book, Skiing
in Utah, and published it in my Wild
Snow history book, as
well as in the Chronology here on my website.
In "official" ski history, the first
ski train is usually considered to be one from
Montreal to the Laurentian mountains in 1927. The Utah train takes
the cake, but perhaps the Montreal train was specially chartered
for skiers, and thus really the "first?" Such is the incredibly
earth shattering stuff that historians converse about.
More about Ruedi Beglinger
and Selkirk Mountain Experience: I've always liked Ruedi
and been a fan of his incredible operation. More, I have dozens
of friends who ski with him every winter. As mentioned below, I'm
curious about just how safe being guided in Canada is. Ruedi published
a letter on his website that says he's done 5,600 days of ski
mountaineering guiding as of this October. For the sake of discussion,
let's assume he's had an average of nine people per day (I asked
some of his clients for a ball-park average), for a total of 50,400 "guest
days" under
his wing.
As we all sadly know,
seven people died during those estimated 50,400 days. So how
does that compare to other activities? Take a look at this
chart and this
table and draw
your own conclusions. But wait, considering the fact that fitness
DECREASES
your risk of death by a significant degree, and backcountry
skiing requires a high fitness level, throw all that out the window!
My gut feeling after doing a bit of math is that careful backcountry
skiers, guided or otherwise, can rest assured they have a statistical
likelihood of leading long lives, and if misfortune does occur
in our lives, it will probably not be in the form of an avalanche
-- our days being guided or otherwise.
December 22 - 2004
It's been interesting to watch the thread about
the January 2003 Selkirk Mountain Experience (SME) avalanche disaster
over on the Couloir
Magazine forums. This is the avalanche the killed
7 guided backcountry skiers. It has been controversial and received
a ton of press. The guide, Ruedi Beglinger, has an amazingly good
safety record -- considering he takes people skiing in avalanche
terrain year after year.
Nonetheless,
per common practice in European and Canadian guiding, Ruedi had
a large group (21 customers) on an avalanche slope at one time, and
this time he and his clients received the sometimes dire consequences
of gang skiiing an avalanche slope. On one side of the issue are
people loyal to Ruedi (many are his friends and customers) who argue
he made no mistakes, while others argue that Ruedi may have made
mistakes, and perhaps Canadian backcountry ski guides should be more
conservative in their approach.
(Having never been guided in Canada,
my position is not firm. I'm uncomfortable with exposing more
than one person at a time to avy hazard, but I understand that in
large groups, spreading out over the landscape introduces other problems
and hazards, such as guides not being able to care for clients.)
It's an interesting discussion, since all backcountry
skiing has risk, and the question is, how much risk mitigation is
culturally and ethically acceptable? In other words, your guide may
have you ski with a helmet, but does he have a helicopter hovering
overhead with a trauma team at the ready? Or in the case of exposing
groups to avalanche hazard (standard in non-guided groups is to expose
one person at a time), what should the standard be? More, exactly
how risky is being guided in Canada? My gut feeling is that it's
incredibly safe to ski with a guide like Ruedi, but it would be nice
to see some numbers that compared the risk of driving to Canada with
that of skiing backcountry powder once you get there.
Moving on to less avalanche
risk: My son and I participated in the
Storm the Stars uphill
race on Aspen Mountain ski area this past
Saturday. The event was held at night, with headlamps, under a clear
moonlit sky. It was incredible. We were mid-pack, and watched as
this huge snake of 269 glimmering headlamps streamed
up the mountain. Once sealed in my own pool of LED illuminated
pain, it reminded me of an alpine start for some huge climb.
Most people do this kind of racing in running shoes, many with traction
attachments. The few the proud the brave (us and perhaps 20 others)
use skis with skins. The climb is 2.5 miles and 3,267 vertical
feet.
The winner did it in 47 minutes. My son and I
we're at about the 1 1/2 hour mark -- good time for a 14-year-old
and a dad at my age and fitness level. The boy beat me -- that was
good -- and I have a feeling he'll be much faster in the next event.
Some of the randonnee and telemark skiers beat us by a good margin
(one guy my age was about 10 minutes ahead of us), so we have some
work to do. Joe, if you read this, Louie and I are on your tail!
I've been doing this climb on skis for more than
25 years. Back in my youthful 20s I could break an hour on ocasion,
usually on Ramer randonnee bindings with fairly lightweight boots
and skis. I don't know if I could ever break an hour again, but
I'd like to knock 10 minutes off my time. We shall see.
For you backcountry skiing gearheads: Louie and
I used fairly short/light Dynafit skis, Dynafit F1 randonee race
boots, and Dynafit TLT bindings. We used nylon climbing skins (more
traction, less glide) because the climb has some steep and icy sections.
For other races we have mohair skins (more glide).
During and after the race they had a big party
up at the beautiful Sundeck restaurant at the top of the mountain,
with a live band, prizes, restaurant and bar -- even some Aspen glitterati
showed up. It was really neat -- highly recommended. Results
here.
December 21 - 2004
Hello fellow backcountry ski and snowboard enthusiasts.
After years of web forum posting, and maintaining my news
links page,
I've decided to follow the masses and publish a blog.
I'll be covering backcountry related subjects
here -- mostly backcountry skiing related -- but also ranging through
hiking, mountain biking, 4-wheel-drive trail driving, hunting, and
just about anything else my family and I do in the backcountry.
While this will be family friendly, I don't plan
on getting too personal. Updates will generally be daily, in the
morning, but I'll do multiple updates on days when the muse hits
me.
Also, this will be a one-way blog that's mostly
created by me, Lou, though my family might chime in now and then.
If you have feedback or comments about what you read here, please
post at the Couloir Magazine forums, with which I'm associated (I
manage them).
Blog stuff: I spoke this morning with Hamish Gowans,
a Colorado climber who's trying to do winter ascents of all 54 Colorado
14,000-foot peaks in a short time period this winter. I'll be posting
updates of his project here at Wildsnow.com. Climbing 14ers in winter
is tougher than most people realize -- should be interesting. I learned
this morning that alpinist Barry Corbet has died. He had a long career,
including participating in the early Canadian
Rockies ski traverse with Bill Briggs, and as a team
member on the 1963 American's Everest expedition. He'd been in a
wheelchair for years, since a helicopter accident while filming the
mountains near here (Aspen area). See
excellent obit here.
That's it for now -- today or tomorrow look for
more blogging about the recent Charge the Stars uphill race on the
Aspen Mountain ski area, and perhaps a bit of opinion about a few
controversial subjects.
Thanks for checking in -- I hope you enjoy it!
'best, Lou
current backcountry skiing
blog weblog
|