November 9 - 2005
Climbing Skins, and Sanctification via DVD
Paging through the latest issue of Backcountry Magazine
(looks good, but kind of heavy on the advertising vs. content ratio),
low and behold, someone covers the Rat
Tail skin attachment I've promoted for years,
and does a how-to article about it! I'm flattered! Let's be clear,
however, that I didn't invent the Rat Tail. While I refined the concept
over the years and was the first to pubish it (here on this website),
the idea was first introduced to our group of 1970s skiers by extreme
skier Chris Landry, who said he'd seen something similar in Canada.
Environmental screed of the month: Along
with my copy of Backcountry Magazine came "Sanctified," a movie DVD.
Normally I like to be positive about anyone's creative efforts. But
when it comes to proselytizing with said "art," the crit gloves come
off:
Can we just say "Sanctified" is a pile of biased
one-sided green propaganda loosely strung together with mediocre ski
porn, and leave it at that? Yes, Virginia, we can, but we can say more.
"Sanctified" implies a
number of things about global warming. Chiefly, by cutting from shots
of snowmobiles to those of presumably human powered ski descents, it
implies that backcountry skiing will make some kind of significant
reduction in green house gasses. Or weirder, it seems to infer we can
somehow live in a yurt in the mountains 365 days a year, not burn firewood,
not use a pickup truck to maintain the yurt, and thus gloat about our
no-impact lifestyle.
Sure, for a brief moment in your life, you can
hike up a hill on backcountry skis and cause less pollution that
if you were snowmobiling. But face it, the vast bulk of human caused
greenhouse gasses are created by our overall industrial and automobile
based lifestyle, not by our recreation choices, and not just by we
Americans living that way (ever been to Mexico city?). More, the greenhouse
gassing developments and industrial skiing that ski town nimbys love
to hate also support much of the sanctified lifestyle that some of
the narrators in the "Sanctified" movie gloat
about. Think about that the next time you drive to a trailhead after
a week at your carpentry or lodging job.
More, the film rails on industrial skiing and development,
then cuts to the CEO of Aspen Skiing Company on a high horse, talking
about how some ski resorts are too industrialized, global warming,
etcetera. I'm a fan of Aspen Skiing Company. They do a good job providing
lift served skiing. But last time I looked, they were still burning
thousands of gallons of diesel fuel, pulling gigawats of electricity,
running a mechanized snow cat skiing operation in pristine winter backcountry,
and supporting a town choked with automobiles and endless mega-industrial
construction projects. Yeah, Aspen Skiing Company uses some biodiesel
(still creates greenhouse gasses, and comes from huge industrial petroleum
based farming operations), and they use some wind power (from gigantic
wind farms maintained by our country's industrial infrastructure).
They also use some energy efficient light bulbs. But to imply that
Aspen Skiing Company is somehow environmentally sanctified is "greenwashing,"
pure and simple.
What's the solution to global warming? Let's
get real. If it's as bad as the folks in "Sanctified" would have us
believe, what would it take to stop it "cold," or reverse the process?
After a bit of research, it appears a rule of thumb is that humanity
as a whole would have to reduce their carbon consumption (gasoline,
wood fires, coal, petro-farming, fleece manufacturing) by at least ONE
HALF in several years! Exactly how
is that done? Not by driving a Prius. And not by choosing backcountry
skiing over snowmobiling -- however sanctified that feels.
In fact, for humanity to reduce carbon consumption
by 50% is probably impossible on the short term. And iffy in the long
run, since the world is being industrialized at a torrid pace -- by
countries who might sign a global warming treaty for whatever reason,
but who's compliance to such an agreement is another matter entirely.
So what's the solution? Sure, it's only logical
to be frugal with our energy consumption, as perhaps we can reduce
global warming slightly and live with it. For starters, those who tout
their sanctified lifestyle in "Sanctified" might consider
the high carbon-consumption per-capita that living in a mountain town
entails (food distribution by long distance truck haul, heating homes
for colder average temperatures, industrial recreation such as ski
resorts, long distance travel to visit mom and dad, snow removal costs,
etc.). To compensate for that and be truly "sanctified" you
mountain town residents owe it to the rest of us to be even more frugal
in your energy consumption habits. Indeed, choosing muscle powered
snowsports over snowmobiling is nice and we thank your for that, but
please, don't use ski lifts, helicopters or snowcats, don't travel,
and ride your bicycle to the trailhead.
What's positive about this film? In a word, Bob
Athey, when he says "...go to the mountains, get peace and quiet, keeps
a person sane and healthy." Qualified with his statement that
he got fired from every other job he's had, so backcountry skiing (he's
a paid avy observer) is all he can do anyway. Anything from Bob is
always priceless.
Lastly: is
this DVD recyclable (sorry Bob)?
Previous
backcountry skiing blog weblog:
(8,000 meter ski descents, Kasha Rigby, is a telemark gear descent
a "first descent?")
|