November 8 - 2005
Backcountry Skiing Avalanche Death
A young snowboarder died in an avalanche on Colorado's Berthoud Pass
this past Sunday morning.
Samuel Teetzen's day probably started out like many
of yours or mine -- excited about fresh powder and adventure with friends.
He was found without his avalanche beacon, reports say he left it in
his car. One wonders what went through Teetzen's mind as he headed
for an avalanche slope with his snowboard, but no avalanche safety
gear. Did he know it was an avalanche slope? Did he care?
Reports say Teetzen might have died from trauma,
making a beacon less of an issue. But it is an issue. First, other
people had to risk their lives during a lengthy search, if he'd had
a beacon the search would have taken mere minutes. Second, staying
alive in avalanche country is all about attitude. At home or the trailhead,
putting your beacon on and testing it becomes a ritual that hopefully
switches your brain to "avy mode." It's sad nothing that morning jogged
Teetzen's brain into thinking the avalanche slope he planned on riding
might actually avalanche.
Teetzen's accident brings another issue to the fore.
Accounts state it was difficult to dig him out because of the snowboard
still strapped to his feet. Will your gear come off if you get caught
in a slide? Something to think about.
Yeah, despite hopes that global warming would bring us a more cohesive
Colorado snowpack, that appears to not be the case. Caution is the
rule.
article about backcountry skiing snowboarding avalanche accident
More 8000 meter backcountry skiing thoughts
Yesterday, distracted by the issue of meaningless "firsts," I neglected
to cover what notable skiing had actually been done on Cho Oyo.
The peak is the easiest 8,0000 meter peak to climb
and ski, and is very popular as a climb. By saying "easiest" I
don't mean to denigrate the challenge of climbing Cho, as it's still
a high, tough mountain -- especially if done without supplemental oxygen
or heavy handed guiding.
Cho Oyo was first skied from the summit in
1988, by Italians Flavio Spazzadeschi and Lino Zani. In 2000
Laura
Bakos backcountry skied from the summit and became the first North
American woman to ski an 8000 meter peak. Laura's firsts pale in comparison
to the actual 1988 first descent, but nonetheless have a lot more significance
than a first based on what gear the skier used.
Another interesting factoid about Cho is it was
the first 8000 meter peak to have a significant (but non-summit) ski
descent: In 1964 Fritz Stammberger did the first climb of the the
peak done without supplemental oxygen, then skied down from 24,000
feet. More
Stammberger backcountry skiing info.
Still up for more mountain skiing firsts? The first
ski descent of an 8,000 meter peak from teh summit was probably that
of Josef Millenger and Peter Wrogotter, who skied teh NE face of Manaslu
in 1981. More info
here. After that, anotehr early ski descent of an
8,000 meter peak was done by Sylvain Saudan in 1982, on Hidden Peak
(8068 meters).
Up for a bit of Saudan trivia? The guy was talented
-- and also known as a somewhat harsh business man who attempted to
extract profit from everything possible. He even went so far
as to sue Whistler ski resort for "illegal" use of his name
when they named a run after him! (The "Couloir Extreme" was
originally named for Saudan).
November 7 - 2005
Backcountry Skiing First Descents -- Censorship?
A couple of people pointed me to an amusing thread
on Teletips, debating whether backcountry skiing down a mountain
without your heels latched down is some kind of significant "first." Along
with that, a person contacted me and said they'd been censored
on Teletips after dissing one of the tele mob's heroes as to "first
tele" descents and such, and a major thread had subsequently been deleted
from their forum! And I thought I was supposed to be the "heavy handed
over bearing censor" over on the Couloir forums. Bummer someone has
stolen my crown (on second thought, playing God isn't all that great
anyhow, remember that movie, Bruce Almighty?)!
One such skiing "first" in
question is Kasha Rigby's recent free-heel descent of Cho Oyu,
the world's sixth highest mountain (in Tibet, 8,201 meters).
While arguably one of the easiest 8,000 meter peaks
to climb, and certainly the easiest to backcountry ski, getting up
and down ANY 8,000 meter peak is quite an accomplishment. Skiing down
is notable. If nothing else, one has to admire the level
of commitment this type of alpinism requires. Just rounding up the
money for a Himalayan expedition is no small feat, not to mention the
logistics needed for a successful trip (that is, assuming you're not
sponsored, you organize the shindig yourself, and climb without oxygen.).
But is the first free heel skiing of Cho Oyu something we should celebrate
in terms of the sport of skiing, and record in the record books?
For more than 30 years we've been hearing
claims of "first pins," "first tele," and first "free
heel" when describing backcountry skiing descents. Even
back when I was telemarking, those qualifiers frequently sounded like
desperate cries for recognition (or free jackets) rather than true
statements of any notable athletic accomplishments. These days such
claims sound the same -- and elicit a big yawn since the burly version
of telemark gear is nearly equal to any other ski gear in performance
(e.g., tele gear with huge boots, tow truck cable bindings, gigantic
skis).
Indeed, after three decades
of telemark skiers attempting to gain traction for "first telemark
descent" claims, the concept appears to be dead, and needing a do-not-resuscitate
order. Instead, what myself and many other backcountry skiers who track
this stuff are interested in is who went down something first, on skis,
PERIOD.
Witness Kasha Rigby's own website, which is obviously
designed to sell sponsorship deals (nothing wrong with that, by the
way, but it's important to note -- if "first telemark" was that
important, would it not be plastered all over her website? Perhaps
that's coming in her next redesign?). Indeed, Kasha's bio mentions
a handful of ski descents, but never states
what type of gear was used. Can you assume it was all tele? Nope, Kasha
also skis with AT gear. I admire Kasha for rising above this issue.
More power to her for finding a "hook" and being a heavily sponsored
tele icon -- yet not letting her website obsess on what type of gear
she uses, as some of her fans appear to do.
Enough. No need to get too serious here, as I'm
sure I've already generated plenty of hate mail. For with, a lighthearted
look at why a first free-heel descent should be considered different
from a first ski descent, with comments in parenthesis from yours
truly:
"Telemarking is more fun than fixed heel skiing"
(With same logic: driving a Ford is more fun than driving a Chevy,
therefore the first drive of a Ford should be a big event. This is
true about Jeeps, but not about Fords, or telemarking, or Subarus
for that matter.)
"Telemarking is fun" (Okaaaay....repeat after me
while skiing free-heel or fixed-heel down 8,000 meter peak gasping
for oxygen: this is fun, this is fun, this is fun...)
"Telemarking is the most fun you can have with your
cloths on" (nude photos of Kasha posing with skis have many tele-boys
believing different.)
"Telemarking is as easy as randonnee skiing" (Perhaps,
if your gear weighs a ton, you can't tour with it efficiently, and
you're age is under 30 so you're strong enough not to know the difference.)
"Telemarking is harder so it should be considered
a first" (So is skiing with your helmet over your face.)
"Telemarking is a sport that should be considered
separate from fixed-heel skiing" ( Yep, as is hitting balls in a batting
cage.)
"Telemarking is cool" (So is Bode Miller.)
"Alpine skiers look like their feet are stuck in
cement" (See above.)
"Telemarking has soul (Sorry, Muddy Waters has soul,
skiing has soul, but to say a particular turn has more soul than another?
Seems a bit much. After all, Norheim's crowd invented the parallel
turn too.)
"I make my living from telemarking" (Money talks!)
"Telemarking
helps me meet chicks" (Kasha? Otherwise, shut up.)
"Free your heel, free your mind" (Mind, at 8,000
meters? Hey, look in my pack, are these prayer flags or my jacket?
Hey, is this my right foot, or my left -- dang tele bindings?! Hand
me that oxygen mask!)
"It's all skiing" (No argument there.)
Teletips
thread
November 3 - 2005
Backcountry Skiing Prep in Moab
Yeah, snow has piled up in the Colorado mountains
and the backcountry skiing is amazing for this time of year -- but
we had to get that last Moab fix. Sitting on the deck at an Internet
cafe at the moment, on Moab's main drag. Done with a day of hiking/biking/unicycling/jeeping
up on Fins 'n Things trail. What a cool place for a combo trip. Tons
of amazing slickrock to play on, scenic, nice driving, etc.
 |
| Some guy named Andrew tagged along for unicycle
lessons. He seemed to learn fast, and tackled one of the harder
obstacles with nary a whimper. He's good at backcountry skiing
so that probably helped. |
November 2 - 2005
Dynafit Backcountry Skiing Bindings - Mounting
A couple of people have contacted me about the Dynafit
mount instructions here at Wildsnow.com. They work okay for most people,
but I was placing too much emphasis on how the skis were positioned
on the workbench. I did some editing work on the instructions to help
with this, but here is more clarification:
Basically, for home mounting Dynafit backcountry
skiing bindings without a mechanical jig it helps to have accurate
marks on the skis showing the boot-center location and the Dynafit
pivot location. These marks work best if they're all the way across
the ski (left/right), and square to the skis tip/tail axis. By laying
the skis on your workbench parallel to the edge of the bench, it's
easy to make these marks with a framing square. That said, it's not
necessary to obsess on these marks. If they're accurate in the tip/tail
direction, and visibly not crooked, their fine.
After that, the other mark you need is a tip/tail
center line drawn in the binding mount area of your backcountry skis,
extending for and aft of the binding position by a few inches. This
line is used to center the paper template, and thus must be accurate.
Department of travel: Heading out for a long
weekend starting tomorrow, will blog on the road if possible. Back
to full pace on Monday. Have new backcountry skiing pack from Backcountry
Access to cover, and boot fitting will commence as well as some Dynafit
mods. Also have our 1-year blogiversary coming up. Is there a way to
celebrate that online? We shall see. Thanks all for visiting -- it's
going to be an incredible winter!
November 1 - 2005
Backcountry Skiing Websites? Sort of...
Going crazy here working on my web client's sites
that are under development. Interesting stuff, at least to some of
us... If you or loved ones have any substance abuse issues, check out http://www.jaywalkerlodge.com because
they take their clients backcountry skiing! Or, getting back to backcountry
skiing for the masses, check out http://www.huts.org for
all your Colorado hutting needs...what else...oh yeah, been gradually
amping up photographer Robert Thompson's site, still in development,
but coming along, see http://photo-colorado.com
And, my favorite of them all: http://www.code4x4.com where
they build the trucks of your dreams (or nightmares if you're of the
greenie contingent).
Back to backcountry skiing, latest model of Garmont
Mega Rides dropped from the sky today. As the sole length is about
the same as the Dynafit Aero's blogged yesterday, here are the weights
for you fanatics out there:
Dynafit Aero, sole 324, 73.5 ounces per boot
Garmont Mega Ride, sole 330, 64.8 ounces per boot
The Dynafit definitely has more shell volume, and
is stiffer. The Garmont might be slightly more comfortable for touring
because the shell is a touch softer, and it has a removable tongue.
I'll keep blogging these contenders as season progresses.
Previous
backcountry skiing blog weblog:
(Dynafit Freeride Aero randonnee boots - First Look)
|