The last thing I want to do is have to put on damp ski boots (which should be drying by the stove) to obey the call of nature. In 20 years of ski touring in Norway the best solution for me is the MEC hut bootee with waterproof cover (covers sadly no longer made but the Expedition Bootee is similar -405g per pair). This has a knee high waterproof outer with drawstring top so postholing along a snowed in path to the outhouse is no problem.

Also consider Forty Below who make some good booties (283g per pair ).

Crossing hard snow in a screaming blizzard is more of a challenge as there is no sole grip. Those of you who have skied the Haute Route will know that grip is especially important if visiting the toilet at the Vignettes hut (Switzerland) – its 10 metres along a icy path which runs along a cliff edge – one slip and its 1000 ft vertical down to the glacier.

Either way its better than a shoe with lots of holes when its well below zero outside.

So you all dont think I have a preoccupation with trips outside the hut – they also keep ypur feet warm when relaxing inside – cold air sits at floor level however much wood you throw in the stove Also for people like me who dont get away often enough and so get blisters from AT or tele boots – soft shoes definitely score points in the evening.

On the question of appearance – Hut Bootees may not be cool looking but you will always have warm feet and they give kudos by suggesting that you only occasionally take the soft option of using a hut and camp / snowhole at other times.

Booties definitely fail as town wear – but that the only downside I can see.

Everytime I have left mine behind (usually on weight grounds) I have regretted it.

Am intrigued by the Cross M’s. Do they roll up?