<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ask Lou, part 6194, can I use worn out bindings to ski Denali?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wildsnow.com/4893/dynafit-bindings-denali/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wildsnow.com/4893/dynafit-bindings-denali/</link>
	<description>Backcountry Skiing Weblog Blog, FAQs, more, links and info about randonnee, telemark and backcountry ski mountaineering.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 16:20:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Shefftz</title>
		<link>http://www.wildsnow.com/4893/dynafit-bindings-denali/#comment-35450</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Shefftz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 17:07:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wildsnow.com/?p=4893#comment-35450</guid>
		<description>Bob, look here:  http://www.wildsnow.com/1813/wide-ski-crampons/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bob, look here:  <a href="http://www.wildsnow.com/1813/wide-ski-crampons/" rel="nofollow">http://www.wildsnow.com/1813/wide-ski-crampons/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.wildsnow.com/4893/dynafit-bindings-denali/#comment-35444</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 16:23:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wildsnow.com/?p=4893#comment-35444</guid>
		<description>Lou,

Off topic question... would a dynafit 110mm ski crampon fit a 111mm ski? Does dynafit make a crampon larger than 110mm?

Cheers, 

Bob</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lou,</p>
<p>Off topic question&#8230; would a dynafit 110mm ski crampon fit a 111mm ski? Does dynafit make a crampon larger than 110mm?</p>
<p>Cheers, </p>
<p>Bob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christian C</title>
		<link>http://www.wildsnow.com/4893/dynafit-bindings-denali/#comment-35413</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 19:19:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wildsnow.com/?p=4893#comment-35413</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve found the least humane solution to the old gear problem...

http://www.ssiworld.com/watch/skis-snowboard.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve found the least humane solution to the old gear problem&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ssiworld.com/watch/skis-snowboard.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.ssiworld.com/watch/skis-snowboard.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lou</title>
		<link>http://www.wildsnow.com/4893/dynafit-bindings-denali/#comment-35399</link>
		<dc:creator>Lou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 21:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wildsnow.com/?p=4893#comment-35399</guid>
		<description>Hmmm, I think you guys are pretty much correct.

If a person is serious about skiing the big Daddy, they should use both leashes and brakes as a lost ski would blow their whole dream. But if they&#039;re up there just using skis for transport with the possibility of skiing summit, then perhaps just leave the leashes off. I can see going either way, depending on importance of skis to the ultimate goal. 

For example, if I went up there again to just mess around looking for optimal conditions  and _perhaps_ ski it again, I&#039;d probably forget the leashes. Have to admit, though, that the time I stuffed my leg and ski in a crevasse and scared the stuffing out of myself, it was probably good I had leashes since the possibility of the ski popping off and getting lost in there was pretty good, and that would have left me tromping around in a crevasse field with one ski -- though plenty of other people were walking through there on foot, so it wouldn&#039;t have been that bad...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm, I think you guys are pretty much correct.</p>
<p>If a person is serious about skiing the big Daddy, they should use both leashes and brakes as a lost ski would blow their whole dream. But if they&#8217;re up there just using skis for transport with the possibility of skiing summit, then perhaps just leave the leashes off. I can see going either way, depending on importance of skis to the ultimate goal. </p>
<p>For example, if I went up there again to just mess around looking for optimal conditions  and _perhaps_ ski it again, I&#8217;d probably forget the leashes. Have to admit, though, that the time I stuffed my leg and ski in a crevasse and scared the stuffing out of myself, it was probably good I had leashes since the possibility of the ski popping off and getting lost in there was pretty good, and that would have left me tromping around in a crevasse field with one ski &#8212; though plenty of other people were walking through there on foot, so it wouldn&#8217;t have been that bad&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jordan</title>
		<link>http://www.wildsnow.com/4893/dynafit-bindings-denali/#comment-35397</link>
		<dc:creator>Jordan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 20:20:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wildsnow.com/?p=4893#comment-35397</guid>
		<description>Second for Caleb&#039;s need for leashes!

Bring new dynafits!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Second for Caleb&#8217;s need for leashes!</p>
<p>Bring new dynafits!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
