<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dynafit 2011/12 &#8212; The new Bindings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wildsnow.com/4309/dynafit-bindings-radical-2011/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wildsnow.com/4309/dynafit-bindings-radical-2011/</link>
	<description>Backcountry Skiing Weblog Blog, FAQs, more, links and info about randonnee, telemark and backcountry ski mountaineering.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 19:13:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim K</title>
		<link>http://www.wildsnow.com/4309/dynafit-bindings-radical-2011/#comment-51551</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 12:57:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wildsnow.com/?p=4309#comment-51551</guid>
		<description>Lou, 

new guy question  / thought /problem /application...... lift serve for 30 years, on pretty stiff performance gear, reasonably acceptable skier... bigger guy 215lbs....   started BC here in the North East (Mt Washington area) a year ish ago...  current boots are a set of modded Mercury&#039;s with a krypton tongue...  a set of tonics, a set of drifts both  with dynafits , and a set of backlash&#039;s with  barrons... in firmer snow / lift serve/ typical new england bc  stuff  I can not ski the tonic/drifts .. I seem to be in the back all the time  , getting a lot of crossed tail , not able to set an edge and generally out of control  the backlashes perform  like every other ski I&#039;ve liked ... demo&#039;d some other things this weekend in light powder @ a ski area... everything with dynafits sucked (BD Reverts, a G3 and a couple others I can&#039;t remember) .. when I got on anything that had a raised frame binding, everything was good (and some wider 104+ skis) ...... I really don&#039;t want to change to a marker or Frichie  tour binding. swapped a set of dynfits onto my backlashes for a tour yesterday... a foot or so of fresh powder on a firmish base. They seemed to ski ok... (obviously not a controlled test) 

Does it sound  like I might benifit from shim plating as mentioned above or playing with the toe height.. or might you have some other suggestion? 


BTW Mark Synnott said to say hello , I was skiing with him yesterday.... and the back ups you suggested for the g-friend are perfect ....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lou, </p>
<p>new guy question  / thought /problem /application&#8230;&#8230; lift serve for 30 years, on pretty stiff performance gear, reasonably acceptable skier&#8230; bigger guy 215lbs&#8230;.   started BC here in the North East (Mt Washington area) a year ish ago&#8230;  current boots are a set of modded Mercury&#8217;s with a krypton tongue&#8230;  a set of tonics, a set of drifts both  with dynafits , and a set of backlash&#8217;s with  barrons&#8230; in firmer snow / lift serve/ typical new england bc  stuff  I can not ski the tonic/drifts .. I seem to be in the back all the time  , getting a lot of crossed tail , not able to set an edge and generally out of control  the backlashes perform  like every other ski I&#8217;ve liked &#8230; demo&#8217;d some other things this weekend in light powder @ a ski area&#8230; everything with dynafits sucked (BD Reverts, a G3 and a couple others I can&#8217;t remember) .. when I got on anything that had a raised frame binding, everything was good (and some wider 104+ skis) &#8230;&#8230; I really don&#8217;t want to change to a marker or Frichie  tour binding. swapped a set of dynfits onto my backlashes for a tour yesterday&#8230; a foot or so of fresh powder on a firmish base. They seemed to ski ok&#8230; (obviously not a controlled test) </p>
<p>Does it sound  like I might benifit from shim plating as mentioned above or playing with the toe height.. or might you have some other suggestion? </p>
<p>BTW Mark Synnott said to say hello , I was skiing with him yesterday&#8230;. and the back ups you suggested for the g-friend are perfect &#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lou Dawson</title>
		<link>http://www.wildsnow.com/4309/dynafit-bindings-radical-2011/#comment-51408</link>
		<dc:creator>Lou Dawson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 20:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wildsnow.com/?p=4309#comment-51408</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I usually chop all the plastic off and just have the metal hooks sticking out. The plastic is cosmetic, sadly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I usually chop all the plastic off and just have the metal hooks sticking out. The plastic is cosmetic, sadly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boll</title>
		<link>http://www.wildsnow.com/4309/dynafit-bindings-radical-2011/#comment-51407</link>
		<dc:creator>Boll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 19:26:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wildsnow.com/?p=4309#comment-51407</guid>
		<description>So, I chopped the plastic off and the slot now looks like last years radical and works well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, I chopped the plastic off and the slot now looks like last years radical and works well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boll</title>
		<link>http://www.wildsnow.com/4309/dynafit-bindings-radical-2011/#comment-51363</link>
		<dc:creator>Boll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2013 18:34:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wildsnow.com/?p=4309#comment-51363</guid>
		<description>Hi,

Have a pair of last years radical and just picked up a new pair of this years&#039;. Noticed that the crampon slot had recieved another &quot;wave&quot; of plastic (between the two metal hooks pointing towards the tip, if you see what I mean), that isn&#039;t there on the last years model. 

Weird because this plastic hinders the crampon of sliding in the slot.. Actually to the point of where I chipped some plastic off by forcing it lightly... 

Thought I had read/ heard everything about these bindings, but must have missed this. Thoughts on why? I guess I&#039;ll start grinding..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>Have a pair of last years radical and just picked up a new pair of this years&#8217;. Noticed that the crampon slot had recieved another &#8220;wave&#8221; of plastic (between the two metal hooks pointing towards the tip, if you see what I mean), that isn&#8217;t there on the last years model. </p>
<p>Weird because this plastic hinders the crampon of sliding in the slot.. Actually to the point of where I chipped some plastic off by forcing it lightly&#8230; </p>
<p>Thought I had read/ heard everything about these bindings, but must have missed this. Thoughts on why? I guess I&#8217;ll start grinding..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
