backcountry skiing Dynafit Trip Reports resort Misc Gear Reviews Louie weather Black Diamond safety Binding Reviews avalanches skins backpack climbing skins video snowmobile snowboard food clothing Fourteeners Boot Reviews camera huts Fritschi alpinism Utah avalanche safety photography alpinist guidebook Cloudveil Europe Silvretta Rando Racing Guest Blogs Technique kids Gear Mods Elk Mountains training Aspen automotive Wyoming computer Chris Davenport music backcountry skier Christmas 10th Mountain Enviro Rants bicycle North America Avalung TGR Austria GPS Mountain Culture north face Movie Reviews Everest Canada Book Reviews gloves batteries Aspen Mountain lightweight gear History News Backcountry Alps Andrew McLean Salewa Alaska Carbondale Maps Dave Downing first aid helmets Bob Perlmutter pastry Denver Google Aspen Highlands Montana Forest Service Sean Crossen Televangelism snowboarding Eulogies rock climbing Mount Sopris hunting Diamir Greg Hill Ortovox Craig Dostie Mike Marolt Aspen Skiing Company Boot Fitting thermo liner New Zealand

Randonnee Growth Being Reported as Telemark Business

By Lou

Snowsport Industries America (SIA), a trade organization, recently reported that “telemark” sales numbers have increased 14% over last year” (in dollars). While a yawner for some folks, I find such statistics interesting because I love backcountry skiing and like to share it — and also make part of my living from it.

It’s common knowledge that overall snow slider numbers are level or decreasing, so a growing segment of business is big news (even if it only means robbing customers from other categories). Problem is, the 14% number may be misleading, or even a crock. More, when SIA and other information providers use the word “telemark,” are they including randonnee gear in the mix, and thus misleading those of us who draw a sometimes important distinction between telemark and rando backcountry skiing gear?

Leading backcountry equipment and industry expert Clyde Soles, in the latest issue of Gear Trends magazine, wrote that the “…numbers offered by SIA often raise industry eybrows…,” and that “…when contacted by Gear Trends, most longtime backcountry ski retailers and manufacturers dismissed the telemark sales numbers as completely out of touch with reality…”

Soles also covers another set of statistics, gathered by the Outdoor Industry Association (OIA). He writes that “…based on limited datea…OIA shows a strong downward trend for telemark sales in specialty shops…,” but the “overall consensus from many sources is that telemark and alpine touring [AT randonnee] sales have been steadily increasing over the past decade at about 7 percent annually…but overall growth has been slow and steady for telemark, with AT outpacing it in the past few seasons.”

That’s my take. I’ve seen it all move along, with randonnee starting a surge perhaps 4 seasons ago.

So, the BIG question: are SIA and OIA lumping randonnee sales into a category they’re calling “telemark,” but should really be called backcountry or something like that?

Again, Clyde: “Neither SIA nor OIA separates out the AT category in research…”

After perusing Clyde’s writing, and looking at the industry in general, my conclusion is that SIA and OIA stats for “telemark” actually include randonnee sales, and thus applying their numbers to actual telemark skiing is at best misleading, and at worst may give shop owners and consumers the wrong idea of what the trends are.

Clyde ends his article with a take on releasable telemark bindings, discussing their importance for avalanche safety — along with the difficulty of creating ones that are truly effective, don’t weigh a ton, etcettera. Another reason for the surge in randonnee? Perhaps SIA and OIA will some day tell us what people are buying — and why. Until then, you’ll do just as well standing at a trailhead or a lift accessed backcountry gate and counting bindings. That’s what I did — and I saw A LOT of randonnee rigs in one former tele temple.

Posted by Lou on February 10, 2005 | Filed Under Televangelism