<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Sweet Goodness of Aspen Highlands</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wildsnow.com/1596/aspen-highlands-powder-skiin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wildsnow.com/1596/aspen-highlands-powder-skiin/</link>
	<description>Backcountry Skiing Snowboard Telemark Snowsports Information News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 08:31:49 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lou</title>
		<link>http://www.wildsnow.com/1596/aspen-highlands-powder-skiin/comment-page-1/#comment-12806</link>
		<dc:creator>Lou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2008 17:21:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wildsnow.com/?p=1596#comment-12806</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d try the ST.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d try the ST.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander Putz</title>
		<link>http://www.wildsnow.com/1596/aspen-highlands-powder-skiin/comment-page-1/#comment-12805</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexander Putz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2008 16:12:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wildsnow.com/?p=1596#comment-12805</guid>
		<description>Hi Lou,

thanks so much for the great and detailed answer! And yes, weight importance is understood - I did read a lot of your blogs, and the Manaslu felt incredibly light, and I skied/ skinned on Nordica TR9&#039;s with silvretta bindings 15 years ago... (never again!!).. and on a burton splitboard as well
;)
So I take it that I&#039;d be fine with the regular FT - or should I go to the FT12 due to the  FT rentals having been set at 10 (didn&#039;t release yesterday)?
Thanks again!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Lou,</p>
<p>thanks so much for the great and detailed answer! And yes, weight importance is understood &#8211; I did read a lot of your blogs, and the Manaslu felt incredibly light, and I skied/ skinned on Nordica TR9&#8217;s with silvretta bindings 15 years ago&#8230; (never again!!).. and on a burton splitboard as well<br />
;)<br />
So I take it that I&#8217;d be fine with the regular FT &#8211; or should I go to the FT12 due to the  FT rentals having been set at 10 (didn&#8217;t release yesterday)?<br />
Thanks again!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lou</title>
		<link>http://www.wildsnow.com/1596/aspen-highlands-powder-skiin/comment-page-1/#comment-12804</link>
		<dc:creator>Lou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2008 14:20:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wildsnow.com/?p=1596#comment-12804</guid>
		<description>Alex, yeah, I was on the 178 Manaslu. It works amazingly well in my opinion. For lots of laps at the resort I&#039;d eventually rather be on an alpine boot and perhaps an even bigger ski, but it got me the goods. For a strictly BC setup it&#039;s easily one of the best. -- if not the go-to backcountry plank for any region with less than ideal soft snow conditions. I&#039;m also a fan of Goode&#039;s mix of performance and weight, but their skis are way too expensive for something that gets beat up. That is unless you can find a great deal on some.

I wouldn&#039;t know about the 187 Manaslu. You&#039;d better go try it. But with your weight and style I&#039;ll bet it would work great. This year&#039;s Green Machine has plastic on top of the tongue instead of carbon, thus eliminating some of the difference between it and other models. Not a big deal, but if you&#039;ve got a high instep the original carbon tongue does hold it&#039;s shape better when crushed down by the buckle. The Zzero 4 U is easily just as stiff as it&#039;s made from PU plastic, probably stiffer (depending on definitions). I&#039;d think if you were running a longer ski at higher speeds you&#039;d want a bit more boot than the Green Machine. I love them, but I don&#039;t push on the downhill and want the boot that does the most both UP and down. 

As for the FT12 being more torsionally stiff than the ST, no, it&#039;s not. Both bindings are incredibly stiff, just beautifully so. In fact, a little known thing about Dynafit is that once you get on the binding you don&#039;t need quite as much boot. The difference in &quot;wobble&quot; between Dynafit and many other bindings is remarkable. This is simply the result of the binding toe pinning the boot, steel on steel. The only thing the Dynafit lacks is much vertical elasticity in the heel release mechanism. I&#039;ve found that all this requires is that I take more care with exactly what DIN setting I&#039;m using, but it&#039;s something to remember for you dyna-newbies, especially if you&#039;re on bigger boots and skis that transmit bigger shock loads to the binder.

As for Baker and Manaslu, I&#039;ve found I like the Baker a bit better on hardpack, but that could be because of tune or mounting position. And in the spring I like a really short ski that carries easily on my backpack, and the Baker doesn&#039;t have the extra tip/tail length of the Manaslu so it&#039;s shorter for about the same running length. Both skis are great backcountry planks in my opinion.  (Remember that I consider weight to be a big part of the performance equation when I rate skis for backcountry use.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alex, yeah, I was on the 178 Manaslu. It works amazingly well in my opinion. For lots of laps at the resort I&#8217;d eventually rather be on an alpine boot and perhaps an even bigger ski, but it got me the goods. For a strictly BC setup it&#8217;s easily one of the best. &#8212; if not the go-to backcountry plank for any region with less than ideal soft snow conditions. I&#8217;m also a fan of Goode&#8217;s mix of performance and weight, but their skis are way too expensive for something that gets beat up. That is unless you can find a great deal on some.</p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t know about the 187 Manaslu. You&#8217;d better go try it. But with your weight and style I&#8217;ll bet it would work great. This year&#8217;s Green Machine has plastic on top of the tongue instead of carbon, thus eliminating some of the difference between it and other models. Not a big deal, but if you&#8217;ve got a high instep the original carbon tongue does hold it&#8217;s shape better when crushed down by the buckle. The Zzero 4 U is easily just as stiff as it&#8217;s made from PU plastic, probably stiffer (depending on definitions). I&#8217;d think if you were running a longer ski at higher speeds you&#8217;d want a bit more boot than the Green Machine. I love them, but I don&#8217;t push on the downhill and want the boot that does the most both UP and down. </p>
<p>As for the FT12 being more torsionally stiff than the ST, no, it&#8217;s not. Both bindings are incredibly stiff, just beautifully so. In fact, a little known thing about Dynafit is that once you get on the binding you don&#8217;t need quite as much boot. The difference in &#8220;wobble&#8221; between Dynafit and many other bindings is remarkable. This is simply the result of the binding toe pinning the boot, steel on steel. The only thing the Dynafit lacks is much vertical elasticity in the heel release mechanism. I&#8217;ve found that all this requires is that I take more care with exactly what DIN setting I&#8217;m using, but it&#8217;s something to remember for you dyna-newbies, especially if you&#8217;re on bigger boots and skis that transmit bigger shock loads to the binder.</p>
<p>As for Baker and Manaslu, I&#8217;ve found I like the Baker a bit better on hardpack, but that could be because of tune or mounting position. And in the spring I like a really short ski that carries easily on my backpack, and the Baker doesn&#8217;t have the extra tip/tail length of the Manaslu so it&#8217;s shorter for about the same running length. Both skis are great backcountry planks in my opinion.  (Remember that I consider weight to be a big part of the performance equation when I rate skis for backcountry use.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander Putz</title>
		<link>http://www.wildsnow.com/1596/aspen-highlands-powder-skiin/comment-page-1/#comment-12800</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexander Putz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2008 05:33:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wildsnow.com/?p=1596#comment-12800</guid>
		<description>Lou,
what were you skiing at Highlands? The 178 Manaslu you&#039;ve been testing? I took out that ski at Highlands today, only later in the day, on Oly bowl. Setup with Dynafit Rental Bindings and Dynafit Zzero 4 MF.  Seemed to be fine for a ski this light, thought it would make a great BC ski - the boots gave enough control for this ski. That&#039;s what I&#039;m looking for - strictly BC setup, for here and the dream of traversing the Swiss Alps by ski and rail... ;) 
Current alpine setup is Mantra in 184 - great ski esp. in the bowl like today. Wondering: 1. if I should consider the 187 length for the Manaslu (more float, better at higher speeds ?), 2. How much difference btw. the Zzero 4 U and the Green Machine in ski control (down)? 3: is the FT12 binding torsionally stiffer than the regular FT? 4. alternate ski consideration (weight/ float) is the k2 Mt. Baker Superlight 181cm. comparo?
My weight is about 175 (no gear or clothes), height is 6&quot;. Like to ski fast and medium-long turns. Good skier. Marker alpine bindings set at 9 DIN, Ute City Cycles set the FT rental at 10 (or close to it). 
Thanks!!
Alex, Carbondale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lou,<br />
what were you skiing at Highlands? The 178 Manaslu you&#8217;ve been testing? I took out that ski at Highlands today, only later in the day, on Oly bowl. Setup with Dynafit Rental Bindings and Dynafit Zzero 4 MF.  Seemed to be fine for a ski this light, thought it would make a great BC ski &#8211; the boots gave enough control for this ski. That&#8217;s what I&#8217;m looking for &#8211; strictly BC setup, for here and the dream of traversing the Swiss Alps by ski and rail&#8230; ;)<br />
Current alpine setup is Mantra in 184 &#8211; great ski esp. in the bowl like today. Wondering: 1. if I should consider the 187 length for the Manaslu (more float, better at higher speeds ?), 2. How much difference btw. the Zzero 4 U and the Green Machine in ski control (down)? 3: is the FT12 binding torsionally stiffer than the regular FT? 4. alternate ski consideration (weight/ float) is the k2 Mt. Baker Superlight 181cm. comparo?<br />
My weight is about 175 (no gear or clothes), height is 6&#8243;. Like to ski fast and medium-long turns. Good skier. Marker alpine bindings set at 9 DIN, Ute City Cycles set the FT rental at 10 (or close to it).<br />
Thanks!!<br />
Alex, Carbondale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GeorgeT</title>
		<link>http://www.wildsnow.com/1596/aspen-highlands-powder-skiin/comment-page-1/#comment-12798</link>
		<dc:creator>GeorgeT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2008 00:31:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wildsnow.com/?p=1596#comment-12798</guid>
		<description>Father + Son + Epic Pow @ Highlands = Heaven on Earth...Amen</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Father + Son + Epic Pow @ Highlands = Heaven on Earth&#8230;Amen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
