<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Three Myths of Avalanche Survival &#8211; #1, My Beacon is my Savior &#8212; And Needs More Features</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wildsnow.com/1028/two-myths-of-avalanche-survival-1-my-beacon-is-my-savior/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wildsnow.com/1028/two-myths-of-avalanche-survival-1-my-beacon-is-my-savior/</link>
	<description>Backcountry Skiing Weblog Blog, FAQs, more, links and info about randonnee, telemark and backcountry ski mountaineering.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:02:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Tucker</title>
		<link>http://www.wildsnow.com/1028/two-myths-of-avalanche-survival-1-my-beacon-is-my-savior/comment-page-1/#comment-29046</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Tucker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Nov 2010 18:15:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wildsnow.com/?p=1028#comment-29046</guid>
		<description>I totally agree,  I think that everyone should at least have an avalanche beacon for the sheer fact that you never know what could happen when you are dealing with a force that is bigger than you. I use a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.piepsdsp.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Pieps Dsp&lt;/a&gt;
and have been for 4 of 5 years. This particular model is a little bit more expensive then say the freeride version, but even then the freeride is a really decent price for a first beacon. Just make sure you keep yourself safe while on the mountain, especially for the type of riding I do I feel a beacon is one of the best ways to protect myself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree,  I think that everyone should at least have an avalanche beacon for the sheer fact that you never know what could happen when you are dealing with a force that is bigger than you. I use a <a href="http://www.piepsdsp.com" rel="nofollow">Pieps Dsp</a><br />
and have been for 4 of 5 years. This particular model is a little bit more expensive then say the freeride version, but even then the freeride is a really decent price for a first beacon. Just make sure you keep yourself safe while on the mountain, especially for the type of riding I do I feel a beacon is one of the best ways to protect myself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Haymes</title>
		<link>http://www.wildsnow.com/1028/two-myths-of-avalanche-survival-1-my-beacon-is-my-savior/comment-page-1/#comment-12820</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Haymes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2008 01:35:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wildsnow.com/?p=1028#comment-12820</guid>
		<description>Lou:

It took a while for me to find this blog with you from last winter. 

Just to let you know that my  Barryvox Opto 3000 died on me yesterday after about 3 years of use.  The on-off switch did not power on the beacon.  Same results with another set of batteries.  I REALLY liked the dual analog-digital capabilities of this beacon, analog for distance and close in and digital for in between.

I had to use a 10+ year old F1 today which I did not like because I know that it is drifted and we had 4 &quot;cross it one at a time spots&quot;.

I plan to contact Mammut ASAP to fix/replace ASAP.  Any comments/suggestions?

Thanks,

Steve</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lou:</p>
<p>It took a while for me to find this blog with you from last winter. </p>
<p>Just to let you know that my  Barryvox Opto 3000 died on me yesterday after about 3 years of use.  The on-off switch did not power on the beacon.  Same results with another set of batteries.  I REALLY liked the dual analog-digital capabilities of this beacon, analog for distance and close in and digital for in between.</p>
<p>I had to use a 10+ year old F1 today which I did not like because I know that it is drifted and we had 4 &#8220;cross it one at a time spots&#8221;.</p>
<p>I plan to contact Mammut ASAP to fix/replace ASAP.  Any comments/suggestions?</p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
<p>Steve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coofer Cat</title>
		<link>http://www.wildsnow.com/1028/two-myths-of-avalanche-survival-1-my-beacon-is-my-savior/comment-page-1/#comment-9409</link>
		<dc:creator>Coofer Cat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 16:46:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wildsnow.com/?p=1028#comment-9409</guid>
		<description>This page and the comments make interesting reading. I&#039;m a fairly advanced skier, but don&#039;t tend to do much that&#039;s realistically at that much risk (mostly because I don&#039;t spend enough time in snow these days). However, I am thinking I should get a beacon, mostly out of responsibility rather than because I&#039;m in places where it might be needed.

I really don&#039;t care about features or glitz, and I&#039;ll pay almost any amount of money for a decent beacon. I&#039;ll obviously do some practice, but with the best will in the world, I&#039;m never going to be an &quot;experienced&quot; user. As such, I need something that stands a chance of getting me found, and something that makes me some use in an emergency.

I&#039;ve heard that the the Tracker DTS is okay, same goes for the Ortovox M1, but that&#039;s really pretty much hearsay, and almost certainly not based on &quot;real world&quot; experience. It&#039;s been pretty enlightening to hear the differences in reliability and durability, so I&#039;d be really interested to hear which beacons people think are good (so far most feedback&#039;s been pretty negative of most beacons!).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This page and the comments make interesting reading. I&#8217;m a fairly advanced skier, but don&#8217;t tend to do much that&#8217;s realistically at that much risk (mostly because I don&#8217;t spend enough time in snow these days). However, I am thinking I should get a beacon, mostly out of responsibility rather than because I&#8217;m in places where it might be needed.</p>
<p>I really don&#8217;t care about features or glitz, and I&#8217;ll pay almost any amount of money for a decent beacon. I&#8217;ll obviously do some practice, but with the best will in the world, I&#8217;m never going to be an &#8220;experienced&#8221; user. As such, I need something that stands a chance of getting me found, and something that makes me some use in an emergency.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve heard that the the Tracker DTS is okay, same goes for the Ortovox M1, but that&#8217;s really pretty much hearsay, and almost certainly not based on &#8220;real world&#8221; experience. It&#8217;s been pretty enlightening to hear the differences in reliability and durability, so I&#8217;d be really interested to hear which beacons people think are good (so far most feedback&#8217;s been pretty negative of most beacons!).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ffelix</title>
		<link>http://www.wildsnow.com/1028/two-myths-of-avalanche-survival-1-my-beacon-is-my-savior/comment-page-1/#comment-8706</link>
		<dc:creator>ffelix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 22:17:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wildsnow.com/?p=1028#comment-8706</guid>
		<description>Dale Atkins published a paper maybe 7-10 years back about risk acceptance increasing with the use of safety technology. It was well supported by data from studies of automobile &amp; pharmaceutical safety devices [seat belts &amp; child-safety caps, I remember specifically. Maybe helmets, too]. You could ask CAIC or TAR for a copy--the avy world lives in the dark ages as far as putting digital documentation on line. Might as well burn it. Ian McCammon has done related work on human factors in avalanche accidents, too, if you want to check into it.

It seems to be a well-documented phenomenon, not a &quot;simplistic, and sophmoric [SIC] assumption&quot;: use a safety device, incline toward ratcheting up your risky behavior until you feel unsafe again. Werner Munter incorporates this idea in his avalanche awareness writings, as well: low-tech, high-brain; high-tech, low-brain. I don&#039;t know how much has been translated into English, though, or what his supporting references are.

I don&#039;t think that means these devices aren&#039;t useful, but we should be aware of our compensating behavior: my observation is that folks do tend to use them as an excuse to shut their brain off. Witness the cases in these comments. 

And I wonder if today&#039;s bigger skis have something to do with the declining percentages of avalanche victims: less surface pressure? Harder to get face-shots, too :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dale Atkins published a paper maybe 7-10 years back about risk acceptance increasing with the use of safety technology. It was well supported by data from studies of automobile &amp; pharmaceutical safety devices [seat belts &amp; child-safety caps, I remember specifically. Maybe helmets, too]. You could ask CAIC or TAR for a copy&#8211;the avy world lives in the dark ages as far as putting digital documentation on line. Might as well burn it. Ian McCammon has done related work on human factors in avalanche accidents, too, if you want to check into it.</p>
<p>It seems to be a well-documented phenomenon, not a &#8220;simplistic, and sophmoric [SIC] assumption&#8221;: use a safety device, incline toward ratcheting up your risky behavior until you feel unsafe again. Werner Munter incorporates this idea in his avalanche awareness writings, as well: low-tech, high-brain; high-tech, low-brain. I don&#8217;t know how much has been translated into English, though, or what his supporting references are.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think that means these devices aren&#8217;t useful, but we should be aware of our compensating behavior: my observation is that folks do tend to use them as an excuse to shut their brain off. Witness the cases in these comments. </p>
<p>And I wonder if today&#8217;s bigger skis have something to do with the declining percentages of avalanche victims: less surface pressure? Harder to get face-shots, too <img src='http://www.wildsnow.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry</title>
		<link>http://www.wildsnow.com/1028/two-myths-of-avalanche-survival-1-my-beacon-is-my-savior/comment-page-1/#comment-8591</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 01:11:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wildsnow.com/?p=1028#comment-8591</guid>
		<description>I have had good luck with the Barryvox in light use.  I also have an M2 and it is clearly far better built...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have had good luck with the Barryvox in light use.  I also have an M2 and it is clearly far better built&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

